Advertisement

Nano Satellite Attitudes Error Estimation Using Magnetometer Data with Utilization of Kalman Filter

  • M. RajaEmail author
  • Ugur Guven
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 618)

Abstract

This paper focus on Nano satellite attitudes (Roll angles, Pitch angles, and Yaw angles) errors estimation using Kalman Filters. The filter predicts the future estimates from on board sensors such as IMU and magnetometer. The Kalman algorithms implemented with low-cost sensor using MATLAB/SIMULINK environment. The NPSAT-1 Nano satellite attitudes estimations was performed. The Aerodynamic and solar disturbances torque considered for the simulations. The satellite on-board sensors, IMU and Magnetometer into fuze the data with low earth orbit (LEO). NPSAT-1analysis of magnetometers data from reference LEO is (0–5000) Seconds in the orbit. The process and measurement error covariance considered with six state matrices (3 angular angles, 3 angular rates). The Nano satellite Kalman algorithm results accurately estimated the attitudes angles (Roll, Yaw, Pitch) with considered inertia of the model. Finding pointing accuracy of satellite 0.1° from the final value theorem vehicle steady states.

Keywords

Satellite attitudes (Roll Pitch Yaw) Magnetometers Disturbances torques Kalman filter 

References

  1. 1.
    Grewal, M. S., and A.P. Andrews. 2018. Kalman Filtering: Theory and Practice Using MATLAB, 3rd ed. Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kushner, H.J. 1967. Dynamical Equations for Optimum Non-linear Filtering. Journal of Differential Equations 3: 179–190.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Julier, S.J., J. K. Uhlmann, and H. F. Durrant-Whyte. 1995. A New Approach for Filtering Nonlinear Systems. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 1628–1632, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wu, Y., D. Hu, M. Wu, and X. Hu. 2005. Unscented Kalman Filtering for Additive Noise Case: Augmented vs. Non-augmented. In American Control Conference.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sorenson, H.W. (ed.). 1985. Kalman Filtering: Theory and Application. IEEE Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Markley, F.L. 2003. Attitude Error Representation. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics 26 (2): 311–317.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Steyn, W.H. Magnetic Attitude Determination and Control for Low Earth Orbiting Small Satellites. Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Stellenbosch, PO Box 1 Matieland 7602.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vitalich, John. 2003. Design and Simulation of a Three-Axis Stabilized Satellite and Kalman Filter Rate Estimator. Master Thesis, Electrical Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grewal, Andrews. (2001) Kalman Filtering Theory Using MATLAB.Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bibby, J., and H. Toutenburg. 1977. Prediction and Improved Estimation in Linear Models. New York: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lefferts, E.J., F.L. Markey, M. D. Shuster. 1982. Kalman Filtering for Spacecraft Attitude Estimation. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 5(5):417–429.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sorenson, H.W., and A.R. Stubberud. 1968. Non-linear Filtering by Approximation of a Posteriori Density. International Journal of Control 8 (1): 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Julier, S.J., and J.K. Uhlmann. 2004. Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation. Proceedings of the IEEE 92 (3): 401–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crassidis, J.L., F.L. Markley, and Y. Cheng. 2007. Survey of Nonlinear Attitude Estimation Methods. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 30(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Muhammad Shamsul, K.A., and R. Radzuan. A Study of Perturbation Effect on Satellite Orbit using Cowell’s Method. School of Aerospace Engineering, Engineering Campus University Science Malaysia 14300 Nibong Tebal Penang, Malaysia.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zagorski, Pawel. 2012. Modeling Disturbances Influencing an Earth-Orbiting Satellite. Journal of Pomiary Automatyka Robotyka AGH University of Science and Technology 16(5):98–103, 2012.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singh, S., and W. Yim. (1995). Dynamic Feedback Linearization and Large Pitch Attitude Control of Satellite Using Solar Radiation Pressure. In Proceedings of the 1995 American Control Conference, vol. 5, 3131–3135.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gordon, N.J., D.J. Salmond, and A.F.M. Smith. 1993. Novel Approach to Nonlinear/Non-Gaussian Bayesian State Estimation. IEEE Proceedings-F 140 (2): 107–113.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sakoda, D., and J.A. Horning. 2002. Overview of the NPS Spacecraft Architecture and Technology Demonstration Satellite, NPSAT1. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, Tech. Rep. http://www.digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/view, http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1896&context=smallsat.
  20. 20.
    Bak, T. 2002. Spacecraft Attitude Determination–A Magnetometer Approach. Ph.D. Thesis. Aalborg University, Denmark, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UPESDehradunIndia

Personalised recommendations