Advertisement

Results from Teacher Survey: Korean Teachers’ Perspectives on Teaching Mathematics for KLLs

  • Ji Yeong IEmail author
  • Hyewon Chang
  • Ji-Won Son
Chapter
Part of the Mathematics Education – An Asian Perspective book series (MATHEDUCASPER)

Abstract

This chapter describes the results from an anonymous online survey completed by South Korean teachers in 2016. A total of 79 elementary in-service teachers who were teaching from first to sixth grades were surveyed. The primary purpose of this survey was to investigate teacher perspectives and recognition on effective strategies related to culturally responsive pedagogy for teaching mathematics to KLLs, which are described in Chap.  4. This survey, however, was conducted separately from the case study described in Chap.  7. Descriptive statistics were mainly applied to analyze the survey responses, and then the survey results were interpreted based on the modified Culturally Responsive Mathematical Teaching (CRMT) framework. We first explain the purpose and intention of each item’s inclusion and then provide the results with numeric data. If necessary, we provided our interpretation of and among the items as well.

Keywords

Teacher beliefs Teacher survey Culturally responsive mathematical teaching KLLs 

References

  1. Abedi, J. (2006). Language issues in item development. Routledge Handbooks Online. Retrieved from https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203874776.ch17.
  2. Adams, A. (2010). Rehearsal or reorganization two patterns of literacy strategy use in secondary mathematics classes. Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 7(2/3), 371–390.Google Scholar
  3. Beal, C. R., Adams, N. M., & Cohen, P. R. (2009). Reading proficiency and mathematics problem solving by high school English language learners. Urban Education, 45(1), 58–74.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085909352143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brenner, M. E. (1998). Adding cognition to the formula for culturally relevant instruction in mathematics. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 29(2), 214–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, A. E., Adams, V. M., & Davis, G. E. (2007). Cognitive demands and second-language learners: A framework for analyzing mathematics instructional contexts. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(1), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Celedon-Pattichis, S., & Ramirez, N. G. (Eds.). (2012). Beyond good teaching: Advancing mathematics education for ELLs. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  7. Chval, K. B., & Chavez, O. (2011). Designing math lessons for English language learners. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 17(5), 261–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1 & 2), 113–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy bilingual children in the crossfire. Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters Ltd. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=80547.
  10. de Araujo, Z. (2012). Transferring demand: Secondary teachers’ selection and enactment of mathematics tasks for English language learners. University of Georgia.Google Scholar
  11. Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D. (2010). The SIOP model for teaching mathematics to English learners. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  12. Garcia, O., Kleifgen, J. A., & Falchi, L. (2008). From English language learners to emergent bilinguals. Equity matters. Research review no. 1. Campaign for Educational Equity, Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED524002.
  13. Gee, J. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). Bristol, PA: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  14. Harper, C., & Jong, E. (2004). Misconceptions about teaching English-language learners. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(2), 152–162.  https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.48.2.6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Howie, D. (1999). Preparing for positive positioning. In R. Harré & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 53–59). Oxford; Malden, Mass: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. I, Y. J. (2015). Preservice teacher learning for supporting English language learners to make sense of mathematics. University of Missouri, Columbia, MO. Retrieved from https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/47120.
  17. I, Y. J., & Chang, H. (2014). Teaching mathematics for Korean language learners based on ELL education models. ZDM, 46(6), 939–951.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0631-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krashen, S. (2004). Let’s tell the public the truth about bilingual education. Presented at the national association for bilingual education conference, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
  19. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ladson-Billings, G. (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Moll, L. C. (1988). Some key issues in teaching Latino students. Language Arts, 65(5), 465–472.Google Scholar
  22. Moll, L. C. (1989). Teaching second-language students: A Vygotskian perspective. In D. M. Johnson & D. H. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 55–69). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  23. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morales, H., Khisty, L. L., & Chval, K. (2003). Beyond discourse: A multimodal perspective of learning mathematics in a multilingual context. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED500995.
  25. Moschkovich, J. (1999). Supporting the participation of English language learners in mathematical discussions. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(1), 11–19.Google Scholar
  26. Moschkovich, J. (2002). A situated and sociocultural perspective on bilingual mathematics learners. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2&3), 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moschkovich, J. (2007a). Bilingual mathematics learners: How views of language, bilingual learners, and mathematical communication affect instruction. In N. S. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving Access to Mathematics. New York and London: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  28. Moschkovich, J. (2007b). Examining mathematical discourse practices. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(1), 24–30.Google Scholar
  29. Moschkovich, J. (2012). Mathematics, the Common Core, and language: Recommendations for mathematics instruction for ELs aligned with the Common Core. Presented at the understanding language conference, Stanford University, CA. Retrieved from http://ell.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/pdf/academic-papers/02-JMoschkovich%20Math%20FINAL_bound%20with%20appendix.pdf.
  30. Paul, F. G. (2005). Grouping within Algebra I: A structural sieve with powerful effects for low-income, minority, and immigrant students. Educational Policy, 19(2), 262–282.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904804274056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Perkins, I., & Flores, A. (2002). Mathematical notations and procedures of recent immigrant students. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 7(6), 346–351.Google Scholar
  32. Pinnow, R. J., & Chval, K. B. (2014). Positioning ELLs to develop academic, communicative, and social competencies in mathematics. In Common core state standards in mathematics for English language learners (pp. 21–33). Alexandria, VA: TESOL International Association.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (1998). Selecting and creating mathematical tasks: From research to practice. Teaching Mathematics in the Middle School, 3(5), 344–350.Google Scholar
  34. Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 20–32.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053001003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London : Washington, D.C: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  36. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole ed.). Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2014). Identifying authority structures in mathematics classroom discourse: A case of a teacher’s early experience in a new context. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(6), 871–882.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0587-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yoon, B. (2008). Uninvited guests: The influence of teachers’ roles and pedagogies on the positioning of English language learners in the regular classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 495–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Iowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.Seoul National University of EducationSeoulKorea (Republic of)
  3. 3.Department of Learning and InstitutionUniversity at Buffalo - SUNYBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations