Advertisement

Towards an Ontological Analysis of the Alignment Problems of Fields in the Architecture of an Information System

  • Lamia MoudoubahEmail author
  • Khalifa Mansouri
  • Mohammed Qbadou
Conference paper
  • 114 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1076)

Abstract

The different fields of the company must be described with tools and languages that respond well to its needs and requirements. However, existing architecture techniques are based on limited models, due to a lack of resources to ensure consistency and traceability between the organization’s different domains and users. In addition, the governance models of the company’s information systems processes are multiple but lack content analysis. To do this, it is necessary to base a good analysis to assess its quality and conformity in order to avoid any form of immensity, imprecision, uncertainty, inconsistency, and fraud. This article attempts to study and compare three approaches used in the architecture of the company’s information system to infer the alignment problems encountered in the areas of the latter. These problems mainly concern the integration of languages, the tools for describing the processes gathered in the domains and the automated analysis of its models. This work uses ontologies to align the different fields, through deductive reasoning and inference leading to a particular conclusion in order to successfully analyze existing models.

Keywords

Ontology OWL Governorship of the information systems Analyze models Knowledge engineering Strategic alignment 

References

  1. 1.
    Fankam, C., Bellatreche, L., Dehainsala, H., Ait Ameur, Y., Pierra, G.: SISRO, conception de bases de données à partir d’ontologies de domaine. Technique et Science Informatiques 28(10), 1233–1261 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roldan-Garcia, M.M., NavasDelgado, I., Aldana-Montes, J.F.: A design methodology for semantic web database-based systems. In: Third International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ICITA’05), IEEE, vol. 1, pp. 233–237 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jean, S.: Langage d’exploitation de bases de données ontologiques. Mémoire pour l’obtention du DEA T3IA, Université de Poiters (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alignement stratégique du système d’information (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bleistein, S., Cox, K., Verner, J., Phalp, K.: B-SCP: a requirements analysis framework for validating strategic alignment. Inf. Softw. Technol. 48(9) (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Casati, F., Ceri, S., Pernici, B., Pozzi, G.: Workflow evolution. In: Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER’96). Cottbus, Germany, pp. 438–455 (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu, E.: Towards modeling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE’97), pp. 226 (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Etien, A.: L’ingénierie de l’alignement: Concepts, Modèles et Processus. La méthode ACEM pour la correction et l’évolution d’un système d’information aux processus d’entreprise, thèse de doctorat, 13 mars 2006, Université Paris 1 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wand, Y., Weber, R.: On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysisand design grammars. J. Inf. Syst. 3(4), 217–237 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chakraborty, S.A., Doshi, J.: Reducing query processing time for non-synonymous materialized queries with differed criteria. Int. J. Nat. Comput. Res. (IJNCR) 8(2), 75–93 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Luftman, J.N.: Assessing business-IT alignment maturity. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 4(14), 1–50 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Proposition d’une modélisation conceptuelle d’alignement stratégique: La méthode INSTAL. Laure-Hélène ThevenetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soffer, P., Wand, Y.: Goal-driven analysis of process model validity. In: Proceedings of CAiSE’04, Riga, Latvia (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Utilisation conjointe des ontologies et du contexte pour la conception des systèmes de stockage de données. Okba BARKATGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lamia Moudoubah
    • 1
    Email author
  • Khalifa Mansouri
    • 1
  • Mohammed Qbadou
    • 1
  1. 1.SSDIA LaboratoryENSET of Mohammedia, Hassan II University of CasablancaCasablancaMorocco

Personalised recommendations