Advertisement

Effect of Biopolymers on Soil Strengthening

  • Lekshmi P. NairEmail author
  • K. Kannan
Conference paper
  • 41 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 56)

Abstract

Kuttanad region is the largest agricultural area in the state of Kerala. Kuttanad clay is an important soil group, well-known for its low shear strength and high compressibility. The typical Kuttanad soil consists primarily of silt and clay fractions. The natural water content of the soil here is very high and close to the liquid limit. Since Kuttanad is the rice bowl of Kerala, any technique adopted in this region should be eco-friendly and should never cause any harm to the soil and water. This paper discusses the stabilization of Kuttanad clay using biopolymers. Two types of biopolymers were (Xanthan gum and Guar gum) used in this study due to their availability with reasonable prices and their stable behavior. A laboratory study was conducted on Kuttanad clay treated with Xanthan gum and Guar gum, and variation in soil properties was analyzed. The biopolymer was added in different concentrations so as to identify an optimum dosage. From various tests, it was observed that with the addition of Xanthan gum the optimum moisture content has decreased by about 7.4% and the Unconfined Compressive Strength has increased by 51.5% and with the addition of Guar gum, the optimum moisture content has decreased by 17.6% and the Unconfined Compressive Strength has increased by 59.5%.

Keywords

Kuttanad clay Xanthan gum Guar gum Compressive strength 

References

  1. 1.
    Ayeldeen MK, Negm AM, Sawwaf ME (2016) Evaluating the physical characteristics of biopolymer/soil mixtures. Arab J Geosci 9(5):371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ayeldeen M, Negm A, Sawwaf ME, Kitazume M (2017) Enhancing mechanical behaviors of collapsible soil using two biopolymers. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 9:329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biju MS, Arnepalli DN (2016) Biopolymer modified soil: prospects of a promising green technology. In: Proceedings of Indian geotechnical conference, Chennai, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang I, Im J, Cho GC (2016) An envionmentally-friendly geotechnical approach for soil erosion reduction using microbial biopolymers. In: Proceedings of geo—Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chang I, Im J, Lee SW, Cho GC (2017) Strength durability of Gellan gum biopolymer treated korean sand with cyclic wetting and drying. Constr Build Mater 143:210–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chang I, Im J, Prasidhi AK, Cho GC (2015) Effects of Xanthan gum biopolymer on soil strengthening. Constr Build Mater 74:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hataf N, Ghadir P, Ranjbar N (2018) Investigation of soil stabilization using chitosan biopolymer. J Clean Prod 170:1493–1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    IS 2720 (Part 10) Determination of unconfined compressive strength. Bureau of Indian StandardsGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    IS 2720 (Part 7) Determination of water content—dry density relation using light compaction. Bureau of Indian StandardsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringMarian Engineering CollegeThiruvananthapuramIndia

Personalised recommendations