Advertisement

Study on Effect of Particle Shape on Interlocking

  • Ashwani Kumar Bindal
  • Arghya DasEmail author
  • Animesh Das
Conference paper
  • 47 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 56)

Abstract

The mechanical response of a granular system depends on various factors at macroscopic (continuum scale) and microscopic (grain scale) levels. Interlocking between the aggregates is one of the microscopic features that affect the response of granular assembly. The present study deals with the study of the effect of aggregate shape on interlocking. Aluminum rods of circular cross-section are used as the basic elements idealizing the aggregates under plane strain conditions. A biaxial compression setup is fabricated. The load is applied vertically at a constant displacement rate and the lateral displacements of the vertical walls are measured. These vertical walls are partially restrained by horizontal springs. The stiffness of the rod assembly and the translation and rotation of some selected rods are considered as the surrogate parameters indicative of the degree of interlocking. Rods with square or triangular cross-sections are used as intrusions, at various area percentages. The present study suggests that, in general, the stiffness of assembly increases, and translation and rotation decreases as more angular particles are used in the assembly. However, no appreciable difference in the response is observed between the two types of angular particles (that is, rods with triangular and square cross-sections) used in the present study.

Keywords

Interlocking Angular particle Biaxial compression Granular materials 

References

  1. 1.
    Altuhafi FN, Coop MR, Georgiannou VN (2016) Effect of particle shape on the mechanical behavior of natural sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 142(12):04016071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bindal AK (2018) Effect of particle shape on the interlocking behavior of granular materials. Master’s thesis, Indian Institute of Technology KanpurGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cascante G, Santamarina JC (1996) Interparticle contact behavior and wave propagation. J Geotech Eng 122(10):831–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dodds J (2003) Particle shape and stiffness effects on soil behavior. Master’s thesis, Georgia Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Estrada N, Taboada A, Radjaï F (2008) Shear strength and force transmission in granular media with rolling resistance. Phys Rev E 78(2):021301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guo P, Su X (2007) Shear strength, interparticle locking, and dilatancy of granular materials. Can Geotech J 44(5):579–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hardin BO, Richart FE (1963) Elastic wave velocities in granular soils. J Soil Mech Found Div 8933–8965Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Iwashita K, Oda M (1998) Rolling resistance at contacts in simulation of shear band development by DEM. J Eng Mech 124(3):285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim M, Buttlar WG (2010) Stiffening mechanisms of asphalt–aggregate mixtures. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2181(1):98–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li Y (2013) Effects of particle shape and size distribution on the shear strength behavior of composite soils. Bull Eng Geol Environ 72(3–4):371–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu S, Matsuoka H (2003) Microscopic interpretation on a stress-dilatancy relationship of granular materials. Soils Found 43(3):73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martı́n-Pérez B, Pantazopoulou SJ (2001) Effect of bond, aggregate interlock and dowel action on the shear strength degradation of reinforced concrete. Eng Struct 23(2):214–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matsuoka H (1974) A microscopic study on shear mechanism of granular materials. Soils Found 14(1):29–43MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mirghasemi AA, Rothenburg L, Matyas EL (2002) Influence of particle shape on engineering properties of assemblies of two-dimensional polygon-shaped particles. Géotechnique 52(3):209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peña AA, García-Rojo R, Herrmann HJ (2007) Influence of particle shape on sheared dense granular media. Granul Matter 9(3–4):279–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rowe PW (1962) The stress-dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 269(1339):500–527Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Szalwinski C (2017) On critical states, rupture states and interlocking strength of granular materials. Materials (Basel) 10(8):865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Taylor DW (1948) Fundamentals of soil mechanics. WileyGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thornton C (2000) Numerical simulations of deviatoric shear deformation of granular media. Géotechnique 50(1):43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Walraven J (1980) Aggregate interlock: a theoretical and experimental analysis. Doctoral thesis, Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Worth CP, Houlsby GT (1985) Soil mechanics, property characterization and analysis procedure. In: 11th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering. Publication of: Balkema (AA), pp 1–55Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashwani Kumar Bindal
    • 1
  • Arghya Das
    • 1
    Email author
  • Animesh Das
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology KanpurKanpurIndia

Personalised recommendations