Advertisement

Studies on Embankment Foundations with Soft Soil Reinforced with Prestressed Geosynthetic Encapsulated in Thin Layer of Granular Soil

  • R. Anciya FazalEmail author
  • J. Jayamohan
  • S. R. Soorya
Conference paper
  • 42 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 56)

Abstract

This paper investigates the behavior of an embankment resting on soft clay reinforced with prestressed geogrid encapsulated in thin layer of granular soil. Over-excavation and replacement by geosynthetic reinforced granular soil is an effective technique to improve the load-settlement behavior of embankments resting on soft soil. The effectiveness of geosynthetic reinforcement embedded in clayey soil is very less due to poor interfacial strength and buildup of pore water pressure. But now the availability of granular soil is very less and it makes the reinforced soil technique uneconomical. It is also well established that geosynthetics demonstrate their beneficial effects only after considerable settlements. Thus, there is a need for a technique which will improve the bearing capacity without excessive settlement of reinforced granular soil. One technique yet to be comprehensively studied is prestressing the geosynthetic and encapsulating it in a thin layer of sand when used as reinforcement in clays. A series of finite element analyses are carried out using the FE software PLAXIS 2D to investigate the influence of prestressing the geogrid and encapsulating it in thin layer of sand on the load-settlement behavior of embankment foundations. The influence of prestress on the interaction between geogrid and granular soil is investigated by carrying out large-scale direct shear tests. It is observed that the load-settlement behavior and the interaction between geosynthetic and granular soil can be significantly improved by prestressing the geosynthetic reinforcement.

Keywords

Geosynthetics Finite element analyses Embankment Prestress Bearing capacity 

References

  1. 1.
    Abdi MR, Sadrnejad A, Arjomand MA (2009) Strength enhancement of clay by encapsulating geogrids in thin layers of sand. Geotext Geomembr 27:447–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bergado DT, Teerawattanasuk C (2008) 2D and 3D numerical simulations of reinforced embankments on soft ground. Geotext Geomembr 26(1):39–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Briançon L, Villard P (2008) Design of geosynthetic-reinforced platforms spanning localized sinkholes. Geotext Geomembr 26(5):416–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen Y-M, Cao W-P, Chen R-P (2008) An experimental investigation of soil arching within basal reinforced and unreinforced piled embankments. Geotext Geomembr 26(2):164–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elias V, Christopher BB (1996) Mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes, design and construction guidelines. Federal Highway Administration FHWA-Sa-96–071Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Li AL, Rowe RK (2008) Effects of viscous behaviour of geosynthetic reinforcement and foundation soils on embankment performance. Geotext Geomembr 26(4):317–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    Lovisa J, Shukla SK, Sivakugan N (2010) Behaviour of prestressed geotextile-reinforced sand bed supporting a loaded circular footing. Geotext Geomembr 28(2010):23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mitchell JK (1981) Soil improvement: state of the art. In: Proceedings of tenth international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Stockholm, Sweden, vol 4, pp 509–565Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    O’Kelly BC, Naughton PJ (2008) On the interface shear resistance of a novel geogrid with in-plane drainage capability. Geotext Geomembr 26:357–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 11.
    Rowe RK, Taechakumthorn C (2008) Combined effect of PVDs and reinforcement on embankments over rate-sensitive soils. Geotext Geomembr 26(3):239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 12.
    Sarsby RS (2007) Use of ‘Limited Life Geotextiles’ (LLGs) for basal reinforcement of embankments built on soft clay. Geotext Geomembr 25(4–5):302–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 10.
    Shivashankar R, Jayaraj J (2013) Effects of prestressing the reinforcement on the behaviour of reinforced granular beds overlying weak soil. Geotext Geomembr 42(1):69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tatsuoka F, Yamauchi H (1990) A reinforcing method for steep clay slopes using a non-woven geotextiles. Geotext Geomembr 4:241–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zornberg JG, Mitchell JK (1994) Reinforced soil structures with poorly drained backfills. Part I: reinforcement interactions and functions. Geosynth Int 1(2):103–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marian Engineering CollegeThiruvananthapuramIndia
  2. 2.LBS Institute of Technology for WomenThiruvananthapuramIndia

Personalised recommendations