Advertisement

Bearing Capacity of Clayey Soil Reinforced with Geogrid

  • Prachi LingwalEmail author
  • Ashok Kumar Gupta
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 55)

Abstract

Foundations constructed on soil deposits, cohesive in nature or having plasticity, result in low load-bearing capacity, and settlement exceeding permissible value. This may cause structural damage and reduction in the durability of structure. Conventionally the weak cohesive soil was either excavated and replaced with layer of stronger granular material or the size of footing was increased, or both the methods were adopted. These methods are uneconomical and time-consuming. Further, stability of cohesive soil is difficult because of low permeability which takes substantial time to consolidate. Therefore, the use of geosynthetic material has emerged. This study shows the results of laboratory investigation on square footing resting on clayey soil of medium plasticity reinforced with Geogrid. A square footing of dimension 75 mm × 75 mm made of mild steel is used. The important parameters that were examined in this study include the vertical distance between the base of footing and first geogrid layer, the number of geogrid layers, the vertical distance between each geogrid layer and its effect on the ultimate bearing capacity. All the experiments were conducted in a steel tank with transparent acrylic sheet in front. The results of tests performed showed that with the incorporation of geogrid in soil increases the bearing capacity as compared to unreinforced soil. The optimal distance of the top geogrid layer from bottom of footing was found to be 0.35B. There was increase in bearing capacity with increase in geogrid layers, however this effect decreases with increase in layers beyond influence depth. Bearing capacity of the soil reduces with increase in the vertical distance between the geogrids.

Keywords

Shallow foundation Cohesive soil Geogrid Bearing capacity Medium plasticity 

References

  1. 1.
    Binquet J, Lee KL (1975) Bearing capacity tests on reinforced earth slabs. J Geotech Eng Div 101(GT12):1257–1276Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen Q, Farsakh M, Sharma R, Zhang X (2004) Laboratory investigation of behaviour of foundation on geosynthetic reinforced clayey soil. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Das BM, Omar MT (1994) The effects of foundation width on model tests for the bearing capacity of sand with geogrid reinforcement. Geotech Geol Eng 12:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Farsakha M, Chen Q, Sharma R (2013) An experimental evaluation of the behaviour of the footings on Geosynthetic reinforced sand. Jpn Geotech Soc 53:335–348Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ingold TS, Miller KS (1982) Analytical and laboratory investigation of reinforced clay. In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference on geotextile, vol 3, pp 587–592Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lavasan A, Ghazavi M (2012) Behaviour of closely spaced square and circular footings on reinforced sand. Soil Found 52(1):160–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee KM, Manjunath VK (2000) Experimental and numerical studies of geosynthetics-reinforced sand slopes loaded with a footing. Can Geotech J 37:828–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sakti JP, Das BM (1987) Model tests for strip foundation on clay reinforced with geotextile layers. Transportation Research Record No. 1153, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp 40–45Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shadmand A, Ghazavi, M Ganjian N (2018) Load-settlement characteristics of large scale square footing on sand reinforced with opening geocell reinforcement. Geotextiles Geomem 46:319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shin EC, Das BM, Puri VK, Yen SC, Cook EE (1993) Bearing capacity of strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced clay. Geotech Test J 16(4):534–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tafreshi M, Dawson AR (2012) Laboratory tests of footing supported on geotextile reinforced sand under repeated loading. In: The 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, vol 25Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yetimoglu T, Jonathan TH, Saglamer A (1994) Bearing capacity of rectangular footing on geogrid reinforced sand. J Geotech Eng ASCE 120(12):2083–2099CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil EngineeringDelhi Technological UniversityDelhiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringDelhi Technological UniversityDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations