Advertisement

Safety Factor and Failure Mechanism in Geotechnical Engineering: A Numerical Study

  • H. C. NguyenEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 55)

Abstract

Prediction of failure shapes and safety factors is the routine tasks for the geotechnical engineering profession. This paper presents an upper bound approach associated with the edge-based smoothed finite element method and second-order cone programming to estimate the ultimate load and its corresponding failure mechanism. The behavior of the whole domain is assumed to be rigid perfect plasticity and is governed by the Mohr–Coulomb failure criteria with the associated flow rule. The upper bound analysis turns to solve the optimization being casted as the second-ordered cone programming using a state-of-the-art code developed by mathematical researchers. Several simulations using the current numerical procedure have been carried out to investigate the dependency of safety factors and failure modes on soil parameters and geometry problems.

Keywords

Safety factor Failure mechanism Geotechnical engineering 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Prof. C. V. Le for sharing his upper bound code for the Prandtl’s problem using the Von Mises criterion. The author is very grateful to the financial support provided by Vied-Newton Ph.D. scholarship and Dixon Ph.D. scholarship for supporting the studies at Imperial College London.

References

  1. 1.
    Liu G-R, Trung NT (2016) Smoothed finite element methods. CRC pressGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Makrodimopoulos A, Martin CM (2006) Lower bound limit analysis of cohesive‐frictional materials using second‐order cone programming. Int J Numer Methods Eng 66(4):604–634. Wiley Online LibraryCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Makrodimopoulos A, Martin CM 2007 Upper bound limit analysis using simplex strain elements and second-order cone programmingInternational. J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 31(6):835–865. Wiley Online LibraryCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nguyen HC et al (2012) Bearing capacity of footing strip resting on slope using upper bound limit analysis. J Eng Technol EducGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sloan SW (1988) Lower bound limit analysis using finite elements and linear programming. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomechanics 12(1):61–77. Wiley Online LibraryCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sloan SW (1989) Upper bound limit analysis using finite elements and linear programming. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomechanics 13(3):263–282. Wiley Online LibraryCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sloan SW (2013) Geotechnical stability analysis. Géotechnique. ICE Publishing 63(7):531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Terzaghi K (1944) Theoretical soil mechanics. Chapman and Hali, Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringImperial College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations