Advertisement

Institutionalising Sustainable Production Practices: Malaysia’s Solar Photovoltaic Industry

  • Brian LowEmail author
  • Stephanie Kay Ann Cheah
Chapter

Abstract

The case study explores the role of institutions, their effectiveness, and their legitimacy in developing sustainable production practices over time. Set against the backdrop of government reforms in Malaysia’s emerging SPV industry, developing these practices requires a combination of particular macro-institutional conditions and policies. Although the new policies provide wide-ranging opportunities for many businesses, they also impose constraints on how businesses conduct sustainable production practices. Institutional theory points to the role of several factors in legitimising these practices, such as reducing uncertainty and information costs, pathways to transfer solar technology and knowledge, and providing better financial support. Institutional theory also calls into question how a wide array of actors at the macro-institutional level are able to conduct sustainable production practices. This question has two implications for those within the network:
  1. 1.

    How does sustainable production emerge over time and, by extension, what are: (a) the roles of the network actors; and (b) the actors’ effectiveness in driving business sustainability?

     
  2. 2.

    How do actors’ relational dynamics legitimise or delegitimise sustainable production practices?

     
The case study explores these and other questions by tracing four key sustainable production practice indicators from the perspective of both institutional and network theory.

Keywords

Policies Institutions Network Sustainable production practices Renewable energy sources 

References

  1. Alam SS, Nor NFM, Ahmad M, Hashim NHN (2016) A survey on renewable energy development in Malaysia: current status, problems and prospects. Environ Clim Technol 17(1):5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernama (2016, April 22) Malaysia re-pledges to achieve 45 percent CO2 emission by 2030. New Straits Times. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/news/2016/04/140725/malaysia-re-pledges-achieve-45-cent-co2-emission-2030
  3. David PA (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY. Am Econ Rev 75(2):332–337Google Scholar
  4. Deligonul S, Elg U, Cavusgil E, Ghauri PN (2013) Developing strategic supplier networks: an institutional perspective. J Bus Res 66(4):506–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DiMaggio PJ, Powell W (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48(2):147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fernandez-Sanchez G, Rodriquez-Lopez F (2010) A methodology to identify sustainability indicators in construction project management—application to infrastructure projects in Spain. Ecol Ind 10(6):1193–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Håkansson H, Snehota I (1989) No business is an island: the network concept of business strategy. Scand J Manag 5(3):187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Håkansson H, Ford D, Gadde LE, Snehota I, Waluszewski A (2009) Business in networks. Wiley, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  9. Lowell Centre for Sustainable Production (LCSP) (2011) What is sustainable development? Retrieved from https://www.uml.edu/research/lowell-center/
  10. Malaysia Investment Development Authority (MIDA) (2015) Malaysia investment performance report: driving sustainable growth. Retrieved from http://www.mida.gov.my/home/administrator/system_files/modules/photo/uploads/20160301100315_MIPR2015-2.pdf
  11. Mottaleb KA, Kalirajan K (2010) Determinants of foreign direct investments in developing countries. A comparative analysis. J Appl Econ Res 4(4):369–404Google Scholar
  12. Performance Management and Delivery Unit (2014) Economic transformation programme annual report 2014. Retrieved from https://govdocs.sinarproject.org/documents/prime-ministers-department/performance-management-delivery-unit
  13. Ron AJ (1998) Sustainable production: the ultimate result of a continuous improvement. Int J Prod Econ 56–57:99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Scott WR (1995) Institutions and organisations. Sage, Thousands OaksGoogle Scholar
  15. SEDA, Sustainable Energy Development Authority (2016a) SEDA annual report 2016Google Scholar
  16. SEDA, Sustainable Energy Development Authority (2016b) National survey report of PV power applications in Malaysia 2016Google Scholar
  17. SEDA, Sustainable Energy Development Authority (2017) Transitioning the nation towards sustainable energy Malaysia—an account of developing Malaysia’s RE resources, vol 1, no 3, pp 1–60Google Scholar
  18. Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manage Rev 20(3):571–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tenaga Nasional Berhad (2012) Moving on track towards customer demands. Tenaga Link 1:1–20Google Scholar
  20. Tenaga Nasional Berhad (2016) Towards a brighter future driving sustainable and efficient energy. Tenaga Link 1:1–44Google Scholar
  21. Vistage-Mier (2018) 2Q 2018 Vistage-Mier CEO confidence index 2018. Retrieved from http://vistage.com.my/ceo-confidence-index/

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Monash UniversitySubang JayaMalaysia

Personalised recommendations