Advertisement

Developing Sustainability Discourse Skills for Business

  • Susan HoadleyEmail author
  • Chris Baumann
Chapter

Abstract

Marketing has a vital role to play in enabling the success and economic viability of sustainable products, services, and experiences. As a result, “sustainability marketing” has emerged as an interdisciplinary area of knowledge, constructed by social and discursive practices. In this chapter, we apply genre pedagogy, which combines developing knowledge of the disciplinary field with developing language skills to successfully produce written and oral texts, to sustainability marketing as a way to understand these social and discursive practices. After a brief introduction to sustainability marketing and genre pedagogy, we use key aspects of genre to explore the context of sustainability marketing and features of sustainability marketing discourse, followed by a discussion of teaching and learning activities. The teaching notes provides activities for reading a sustainability marketing research article on the adoption of environment-friendly cars. These activities make visible the construction of sustainability marketing knowledge, the authors’ position and the structure of the article. Our aim is to provide specific approaches that can be used to develop skills to read and understand, as well as produce sustainability marketing texts. These skills are essential for university graduates, not only to demonstrate their sustainability knowledge, skills, and attitudes to future employers, but also so they can make innovative contributions to sustainable businesses, organisations, and communities in their careers.

Keywords

Discipline-specific discourse Genre pedagogy Scaffolding Sustainability marketing 

References

  1. Audebrand LK (2010) Sustainability in strategic management education: the quest for new root definition. Acad Manage Learn Educ 9(3):413–428. Retrieved from http://aom.metapress.com/index/C4672472586P328P.pdf
  2. Belz FM, Peattie K (2012) Sustainability marketing: a global perspective, 2nd edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  3. Borin N, Metcalf L (2010) Integrating sustainability into the marketing curriculum: learning activities that facilitate sustainable marketing practices. J Mark Educ 32(2):140–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bridges CM, Wilhelm WB (2008) Going beyond green: the “why and how” of integrating sustainability into the marketing curriculum. J Mark Educ 30(1):33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chu W, Baumann C, Hamin H, Hoadley S (2018) Adoption of environment-friendly cars: direct vis-à-vis mediated effects of government incentives and consumers’ environmental concern across global car markets’. J Glob Mark 1–10Google Scholar
  6. Crittenden VL, Crittenden WF, Ferrell LK, Ferrell OC, Pinney CC (2011) Market-oriented sustainability: a conceptual framework and propositions. J Acad Mark Sci 39(1):71–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Djordjevic A, Cotton DRE (2011) Communicating the sustainability message in higher education institutions. Int J Sustain High Educ 12(4):381–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dreyfus S, Humphrey S, Mahboob A, Martin JR (2016) Genre pedagogy in higher education: the SLATE Project X. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fairclough N (1992) Discourse and social change. Polity Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. Frisk E, Larson KL (2011) Educating for sustainability: competencies and practices for transformative action. J Sustain Educ 2(1):1–20Google Scholar
  11. Gibbons P (2009) English learners, academic literacy, and thinking: learning in the challenge zone. Heinemann, Portsmouth, NHGoogle Scholar
  12. GRI 2018 (2018) GRI standards. Retrieved from https://www.globalreporting.org/standards
  13. Hahn T, Scheermesser M (2006) Approaches to corporate sustainability among German companies. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manage 13(3):150–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Halliday MAK, Matthiessen CMIM (2004) An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. Arnold, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoadley S, Wood LN (2013) How to embed discipline-specific discourse: learning through communication. Macquarie University, Sydney. Retrieved from https://staff.mq.edu.au/public/download.jsp?id=106634
  16. Humphrey S, Macnaught L (2011) Revisiting joint construction in the tertiary context. Aust J Lang Lit 34(1):98–116Google Scholar
  17. International Organization for Standardization (2018) ISO 14000 Environmental management. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/iso-14001-environmental-management.html
  18. Jones P, Clarke-Hill C, Comfort D, Hillier D (2008) Marketing and sustainability. Mark Intell Plann 27(1):103–126Google Scholar
  19. Kotler P (2011) Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative. J Mark 75(4):132–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MacDonald S, Oates CJ (2006) Sustainability: consumer perceptions and marketing strategies. Bus Strategy Environ 15(3):157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McDonagh P, Prothero A (2014) Sustainability marketing research: past, present and future. J Mark Manage 30(11–12):1186–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McFarlane D, Ogazon A (2011) The challenges of sustainability education. J Multidisc Res 3(3):81–107Google Scholar
  23. Morley J (2018) Academic phrasebank. The University of Manchester. Retrieved from http://www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk/
  24. Nesi H, Gardner S (2012) Genres across the disciplines: student writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  25. Pine BJ II, Gilmore JH (1998) Welcome to the experience economy. Harv Bus Rev 76(4):97–105Google Scholar
  26. Porter ME, Kramer MR (2006) The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78–92Google Scholar
  27. Ralston DA, Holt DH, Terpstra RH, Kai-Cheng Y (1997) The impact of natural culture and economic ideology on managerial work values: a study of the United States, Russia, Japan, and China. J Int Bus Stud 39(1):8–226. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rettie R, Burchell K, Riley D (2012) Normalising green behaviours: a new approach to sustainability marketing. J Mark Manage 28(3–4):420–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rothery J (1996) Making changes: developing an educational linguistics. In: Hasan R, Williams G (eds) Literacy in society. Longman, London, UK; New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  30. Rundle-Thiele SR, Wymer W (2010) Stand-alone ethics, social responsibility and sustainability course requirements: a snapshot from Australia and New Zealand. J Mark Educ 32(1):5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wallace C (1992) Reading. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Weber J (2013) Advances in graduate marketing curriculum: paying attention to ethical, social, and sustainability issues. J Mark Educ 35(2):85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wiggins P (1993) Assessing student performance: exploring the purpose and limits of testing. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  34. Winzar H, Baumann C, Chu W (2018) Brand competitiveness: introducing the customer-based brand value (CBBV)-competitiveness chain. Int J Contemp Hospitality Manage 30(1):637–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wood LN, Petocz P (2003) Reading statistics. University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  36. Wood L, McNeill M, Harvey M (2008) How to lead discussions: learning through engagement. Macquarie University. Available at: http://www/mq/edu/au/ltc/pdfs//FBE_Lead_Discussions.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Macquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Seoul National University (SNU)SeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations