Advertisement

Implementing Article 19 of the CRPD in Nordic Welfare States: The Culture of Welfare and the CRPD

  • Ciara Brennan
  • Rannveig TraustadóttirEmail author
Chapter
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Ciara Brennan and Rannveig Traustadóttir provide an account of research carried out in three Nordic welfare states, Iceland, Norway and Sweden, which explored the challenges of implementing Article 19—Living independently and being included in the community, of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD 2006). These States have historically been regarded as ‘leaders’ in the area of deinstitutionalisation and community living. The chapter explores how the human rights approach of the CRPD ‘fits’ with the culture of the Nordic welfare states. Brennan and Traustadóttir identify a Nordic ‘welfare culture’ as the main obstacle to the implementation of Article 19 of the CRPD in Iceland, Norway and Sweden.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the FP7 Marie Curie Initial Training Network (ITN) DREAM, Disability Rights Expanding Accessible Markets (DREAM). Project ID: 265057.

References

  1. Act Concerning Support and Service Provision for Persons with Certain Functional Impairments. (LSS: 1993: 387). (In Swedish: Lag (1993:387) om stöd och service till vissa funktionshindrade.) Retrieved from https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/lag-1993387-om-stod-och-service-till-vissa_sfs-1993-387.
  2. Act on services for disabled people with long-term support needs no. 38/2018. (In Icelandic: Lög um þjónustu við fatlað fólk með langvarandi stuðningsþarfir 38/2018). Retrieved from https://www.althingi.is/altext/stjt/2018.038.html.
  3. Askheim, O. P., Bengtsson, H., & Bjelke, B. R. (2014). Personal assistance in a Scandinavian context: Similarities, differences and developmental traits. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 16(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan, C. (2017). Article 19 and the Nordic experience of independent living and personal assistance. In P. Blanck, E. Flynn, & G. Quinn (Eds.), A research companion to disability law (pp. 156–165). Oxford: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  5. Brennan, C., Traustadóttir, R., Anderberg, P., & Rice, J. (2016a). Are cutbacks to personal assistance violating Sweden’s obligations under the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities? Laws, 5(23), 85–99.  https://doi.org/10.3390/laws5020023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brennan, C., Traustadóttir, R., Rice, J., & Anderberg, P. (2016b). Negotiating independence, choice and autonomy: Experiences of parents who coordinate personal assistance on behalf of their adult son or daughter. Disability & Society, 31(5), 604–621.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1188768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brennan, C., Rice, J., Traustadóttir, R., & Anderberg, P. (2017). How can states ensure access to personal assistance when service delivery is decentralized? A multi-level analysis of Iceland Norway and Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 19(4), 334–346.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2016.1261737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brennan, C., Traustadóttir, R., Rice, J., & Anderberg, P. (2018). “Being number one is the biggest obstacle”: Implementing the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities within Nordic welfare services. Nordic Welfare Research, 3(1), 18–32.  https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.2464-4161-2018-01-03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christiansen, N. F., & Markkola, P. (2005). Introduction. In N. F. Crhistiansen, K. Petersen, N. Edling, & P. Haave (Eds.), The Nordic model of welfare: A historical reappraisal (pp. 9–29). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
  10. Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  11. CRPD. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf.
  12. Degener, T. (2016). Disability in the human rights context. Laws, 5(35), 1–24.Google Scholar
  13. Dworkin, G. (2010). Paternalism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University.Google Scholar
  14. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Esping-Andersen, G. (2002). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flynn, R. J., & Nitsch, K. E. (Eds.). (1980). Normalization, social integration and community services. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  17. Goodley, D. (2010). Disability studies: An intersectional introduction. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  18. Hvinden, B. (2013). Disability. In B. Greve (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of the welfare state (pp. 371–180). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Kangas, O., & Kvist, J. (2013). Nordic welfare states. In B. Greve (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of the welfare state (pp. 148–160). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Lewin, B., Westin, L., & Lewin, L. (2008). Needs and ambitions in Swedish disability care. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 10(4), 237–257.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410802410068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Löve, L., Traustadóttir, R., & Rice, J. G. (2018). Trading autonomy for services: Perceptions of users and providers of services for disabled people in Iceland. ALTER: European Journal of Disability Research, 12, 193–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2018.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nirje, B. (1969). The normalizational principle and its human management implications. In R. B. Kugel & W. Wolfensberger (Eds.), Changing patterns in residential services for the mentally retarded. Washington, DC: President’s Committee on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar
  23. Quinn, B., & Arnardóttir, O. M. (2009). The UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: European and Scandinavian perspectives. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  24. Rice, J., Björnsdóttir, K., & Smith, E. (2015). Spaces of indifference: Bureaucratic governance and disability rights in Iceland. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), Disability research today: International perspectives (pp. 135–148). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Sandvin, J. T., & Lichtwarck, W. (2005). Gradual improvement or deterioration in disguise? In A. Gustavsson, J. Sandvin, R. Traustadóttir, & J. Tøssebro (Eds.), Resistance, reflection and change: Nordic disability research (pp. 59–73). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  26. Spencer-Oatey, H. (2012). What is culture? A compilation of quotation. GlobalPAD Core Concepts. Available at Global PAD Open House. Retrieved from http://www.warwick.ac.uk/globalpadintercultural.
  27. Tøssebro, J., Bonfils, I. S., Teittinen, A., Tideman, M., Traustadóttir, R., & Vesala, T. (2012). Normalization fifty years beyond: Current trends in the Nordic countries. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 9(2), 134–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Disability Studies, University of IcelandReykjavíkIceland

Personalised recommendations