Implementing Article 19 of the CRPD in Nordic Welfare States: The Culture of Welfare and the CRPD
- 6 Downloads
Ciara Brennan and Rannveig Traustadóttir provide an account of research carried out in three Nordic welfare states, Iceland, Norway and Sweden, which explored the challenges of implementing Article 19—Living independently and being included in the community, of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD 2006). These States have historically been regarded as ‘leaders’ in the area of deinstitutionalisation and community living. The chapter explores how the human rights approach of the CRPD ‘fits’ with the culture of the Nordic welfare states. Brennan and Traustadóttir identify a Nordic ‘welfare culture’ as the main obstacle to the implementation of Article 19 of the CRPD in Iceland, Norway and Sweden.
This research was supported by the FP7 Marie Curie Initial Training Network (ITN) DREAM, Disability Rights Expanding Accessible Markets (DREAM). Project ID: 265057.
- Act Concerning Support and Service Provision for Persons with Certain Functional Impairments. (LSS: 1993: 387). (In Swedish: Lag (1993:387) om stöd och service till vissa funktionshindrade.) Retrieved from https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/lag-1993387-om-stod-och-service-till-vissa_sfs-1993-387.
- Act on services for disabled people with long-term support needs no. 38/2018. (In Icelandic: Lög um þjónustu við fatlað fólk með langvarandi stuðningsþarfir 38/2018). Retrieved from https://www.althingi.is/altext/stjt/2018.038.html.
- Brennan, C. (2017). Article 19 and the Nordic experience of independent living and personal assistance. In P. Blanck, E. Flynn, & G. Quinn (Eds.), A research companion to disability law (pp. 156–165). Oxford: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Brennan, C., Traustadóttir, R., Rice, J., & Anderberg, P. (2016b). Negotiating independence, choice and autonomy: Experiences of parents who coordinate personal assistance on behalf of their adult son or daughter. Disability & Society, 31(5), 604–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1188768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brennan, C., Rice, J., Traustadóttir, R., & Anderberg, P. (2017). How can states ensure access to personal assistance when service delivery is decentralized? A multi-level analysis of Iceland Norway and Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 19(4), 334–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2016.1261737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brennan, C., Traustadóttir, R., Rice, J., & Anderberg, P. (2018). “Being number one is the biggest obstacle”: Implementing the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities within Nordic welfare services. Nordic Welfare Research, 3(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.2464-4161-2018-01-03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Christiansen, N. F., & Markkola, P. (2005). Introduction. In N. F. Crhistiansen, K. Petersen, N. Edling, & P. Haave (Eds.), The Nordic model of welfare: A historical reappraisal (pp. 9–29). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
- CRPD. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf.
- Degener, T. (2016). Disability in the human rights context. Laws, 5(35), 1–24.Google Scholar
- Dworkin, G. (2010). Paternalism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University.Google Scholar
- Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Flynn, R. J., & Nitsch, K. E. (Eds.). (1980). Normalization, social integration and community services. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
- Goodley, D. (2010). Disability studies: An intersectional introduction. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Hvinden, B. (2013). Disability. In B. Greve (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of the welfare state (pp. 371–180). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kangas, O., & Kvist, J. (2013). Nordic welfare states. In B. Greve (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of the welfare state (pp. 148–160). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Nirje, B. (1969). The normalizational principle and its human management implications. In R. B. Kugel & W. Wolfensberger (Eds.), Changing patterns in residential services for the mentally retarded. Washington, DC: President’s Committee on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar
- Quinn, B., & Arnardóttir, O. M. (2009). The UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: European and Scandinavian perspectives. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
- Rice, J., Björnsdóttir, K., & Smith, E. (2015). Spaces of indifference: Bureaucratic governance and disability rights in Iceland. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), Disability research today: International perspectives (pp. 135–148). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Sandvin, J. T., & Lichtwarck, W. (2005). Gradual improvement or deterioration in disguise? In A. Gustavsson, J. Sandvin, R. Traustadóttir, & J. Tøssebro (Eds.), Resistance, reflection and change: Nordic disability research (pp. 59–73). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
- Spencer-Oatey, H. (2012). What is culture? A compilation of quotation. GlobalPAD Core Concepts. Available at Global PAD Open House. Retrieved from http://www.warwick.ac.uk/globalpadintercultural.