Advertisement

Resilience Analysis for Comprehensive Transportation Network

  • Shuyun Niu
  • Ji-sheng Zhang
  • Fan Zhang
  • Jian GaoEmail author
Conference paper
  • 12 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 617)

Abstract

Based on resilience theory, considering the security capability, structure capability, operation capability, emergency capability and management level of comprehensive transportation network, from the aspects of security capability, management and service capability of network, the resilience evaluation metrics of comprehensive transportation network is constructed. Meanwhile, the computing method for every index is proposed. Based on the characteristic of qualitative and quantitative combination of resilience metrics, the resilience evaluation method of comprehensive transportation network, which combines the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and TOPSIS (Technique Order Preference Ideal Solution) is proposed. The result of resilience can provide technical support for improving the reliability and preventing and control the risk of the comprehensive transportation network.

Keywords

Resilience of network Comprehensive transportation network Evaluation metrics Security capability of network Operation capacity of network 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport by the fundamental research project (No. 2017-9075), Qinghai science and technology project (2015-SF-A5), National Key Technologies R&D Program Strategic International Science and Technology Innovation Cooperation Projects (No. 2016YFE0206800), and the authors acknowledge the contributions of the team members.

References

  1. 1.
    Laprie JC (2008) From dependability to resilience. In: 38th IEEE/IFIP international conference on dependable systems and networks, Anchorage, Alaska, pp G8–G9Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Briguglio L, Cordina G, Farrugia N, Vella S (2006) Conceptualizing and measuring economic resilience. Constr 1:265–288Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huiping L, Fernandez SJ, Ganguly A (2005) Racial geography, economic growth and natural disaster resilience. House of Representative. Committee on Science and Technology, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murray-Tuite, PM (2006) A comparison of transportation network resilience under simulated system optimum and user equilibrium conditions. In: Proceedings of the 2006 winter simulation conference WSC 06, pp 1398–1405Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heaslip K, Louisell WC, Collura J, Serulle NU (2010) A sketch level method for assessing transportation network resiliency to natural disasters and man-made events. In: 89th annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    VTPI (2010) Evaluating transportation resilience: evaluating the transportation system’s ability to accommodate diverse, variable and unexpected demands with minimal risk, TDM Encyclopedia: Evaluating Transportation Resilience. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, BC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Amdal JR, Swigart SL (2010) In: Becker MC Jr (ed) Resilient transportation systems in a post-disaster environment: a case study of opportunities realized and missed in the greater New Orleans region. University of New Orleans Transportation Institute, New Orleans, LA, p 49Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mostashari A, Omer M, Nilchiani R (2009) Assessing resilience in a regional road based transportation network. Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heaslip K, Louisell WC, Collura J (2009) Quantitative evaluation of transportation resiliency for regional networks. In: 88th annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Serulle NU, Heaslip K, Brady B, Louisell WC, Collura J (2011) Resiliency of transportation network of Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic case study. Transport Res Rec 22–30Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Di Gangi M, Luongo A (2005) Transportation network vulnerability indicator for risk evaluation and exposure reduction. In: Proceedings of the European transport conference (ETC 2005), Strasbourg, FranceGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xia S (1995) Systematic engineering outline. Tsinghua University Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shuyun Niu
    • 1
  • Ji-sheng Zhang
    • 1
  • Fan Zhang
    • 1
  • Jian Gao
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.National ITS Research Center, Research Institute of Highway Ministry of TransportBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations