Modeling the Fate of Chemicals in Products pp 99-111 | Cite as
Effective Management of Demolition Waste Containing Hexabromocyclododecane in China
Abstract
Demolition waste containing hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) can be disposed of at either a waste, material, or substance level; however, their efficiency in mitigating long-term HBCDD contamination can be different. In this chapter, we quantify how much HBCDD emissions can be avoided and how efficiently the stock of HBCDD embedded in the demolition waste can be reduced if mainland China adopts different levels of waste management. We find that a pre-demolition screening combined with environmentally sound treatment, that is, management at the substance level, is the most effective end-of-life management option for minimizing HBCDD emissions and stocks. This level of waste management reduces slightly more HBCDD emissions than accelerating the ban of backfill or illegal open dumping of general demolition waste, that is, management at the waste level. While increasing the recycling of polystyrene materials, that is, management of waste at the material level, is ideal for the circular economy, it is least effective in reducing HBCDD emissions and may introduce this problematic chemical into recovered materials as new in-use stocks.
References
- 1.Schlummer M, Vogelsang J, Fiedler D, Gruber L, Wolz G (2015) Rapid identification of polystyrene foam wastes containing hexabromocyclododecane or its alternative polymeric brominated flame retardant by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. Waste Manag Res 33(7):662–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Secretariat of the Basel Convention (2015) Technical guidelines for the environmentally sound management of wastes consisting of, containing or contaminated with hexabromocyclododecane. Secretariat of the Basel Convention, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 3.Beijing Institute of Technology (2011) Survey report on basic information of HBCDD in China. BeijingGoogle Scholar
- 4.Arnot JA, McCarty L, Armitage JM, Toose-Reid L, Wania F, Cousins IT (2009) An evaluation of hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) for persistent organic pollutant (POP) properties and the potential for adverse effects in the environment. Submitted to European brominated flame retardant industry panel (EBFRIP). University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- 5.MacLeod M, Scheringer M, Hungerbühler K (2007) Estimating enthalpy of vaporization from vapor pressure using Trouton’s rule. Environ Sci Technol 41(8):2827–2832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Anonym (2013) China should increase the use of obsolete PS foams. Plast Sci Technol 41(2):70 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- 7.Peking University (2012) Socio-economic impact analysis of implementing the Stockholm Convention to regulate HBCDD. College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- 8.China’s National Development and Reform Commission (2013, 2014) Annual report of comprehensive utilization of resources (2012 and 2014). China's National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), BeijingGoogle Scholar
- 9.China’s National Development and Reform Commission (2011) The twelfth five-year plan of comprehensive utilization of large industrial solid wastes. China’s National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), BeijingGoogle Scholar
- 10.Managaki S, Hondo H, Yokoyama Y, Miyake Y, Kobayashi T, Miyake A, Masunaga S (2010) Comparative study between life-cycle HBCD and CO2 emissions for the risk trade-off analysis. Organohalogen Compd. 72:1642–1646Google Scholar
- 11.Li L, Weber R, Liu J, Hu J (2016) Long-term emissions of hexabromocyclododecane as a chemical of concern in products in China. Environ Int 91:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Maharana T, Negi YS, Mohanty B (2007) Review article: recycling of polystyrene. Polym Plast Technol Eng 46(7):729–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Barontini F, Cozzani V, Petarca L (2001) Thermal stability and decomposition products of hexabromocyclododecane. Ind Eng Chem Res 40(15):3270–3280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Li H, Zhang Q, Wang P, Li Y, Lv J, Chen W, Geng D, Wang Y, Wang T, Jiang G (2012) Levels and distribution of hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) in environmental samples near manufacturing facilities in Laizhou Bay area, East China. J Environ Monit 14(10):2591–2597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Zhang W (2013) Production and market of expandable polystyrene (EPS) at home and abroad. China Elastomerics 23(6):76–80 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
- 16.Shaw S, Blum A, Weber R, Kannan K, Rich D, Lucas D, Koshland CP, Dobraca D, Hanson S, Birnbaum LS (2010) Halogenated flame retardants: do the fire safety benefits justify the risks? Rev Environ Health 25(4):261–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Weber R, Watson A, Forter M, Oliaei F (2011) Persistent organic pollutants and landfills—a review of past experiences and future challenges. Waste Manag Res 29(1):107–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kajiwara N, Desborough J, Harrad S, Takigami H (2013) Photolysis of brominated flame retardants in textiles exposed to natural sunlight. Environ Sci Process Impacts 15(3):653–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Davis J, Gonsior S, Marty G, Ariano J (2005) The transformation of hexabromocyclododecane in aerobic and anaerobic soils and aquatic sediments. Water Res 39(6):1075–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.USEPA (2014) Flame retardant alternatives for hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) (Final report, EPA Publication 740R14001). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
- 21.Abdallah MA-E, Sharkey M, Berresheim H, Harrad S (2018) Hexabromocyclododecane in polystyrene packaging: a downside of recycling? Chemosphere 199:612–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Rani M, Shim WJ, Han GM, Jang M, Song YK, Hong SH (2014) Hexabromocyclododecane in polystyrene based consumer products: an evidence of unregulated use. Chemosphere 110:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Schlummer M, Mäurer A, Leitner T, Spruzina W (2006) Report: recycling of flame-retarded plastics from waste electric and electronic equipment (WEEE). Waste Manag Res 24(6):573–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar