Advertisement

A Vendor-Buyer Supply Chain Model for Deteriorating Item with Quadratic Time-Varying Demand and Pro-rata Warranty Policy

  • B. Samanta
  • B. C. GiriEmail author
  • K. S. Chaudhuri
Conference paper
  • 44 Downloads
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 302)

Abstract

The article considers a single-vendor a single-buyer supply chain in which the buyer sells a seasonal deteriorating product to customers over a single period of time. At the buyer’s end, the demand is assumed to be quadratic in time. The vendor follows a lot-for-lot policy for replenishment made to the buyer and (s)he agrees to refund the customer’s purchase price on a pro-rata basis, if any item fails during the warranty period offered by the buyer. We derive and optimize the average expected total cost of the supply chain in order to obtain the optimal decisions of the integrated system. An algorithm is developed for finding the optimal solution of the model numerically. A numerical example is taken to demonstrate the coordination policy between the vendor and the buyer. Sensitivity analysis is carried out to investigate the effects of key parameters on the optimal decisions.

Keywords

Supply chain Quadratic demand Deterioration Warranty 

References

  1. 1.
    Goyal, S.K.: An integrated inventory model for single supplier single-customer problem. Int. J. Product. Res. 15, 107–111 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Viswanthan, S.: Optimal strategy for the integrated vendor-buyer inventory model. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 105(1), 38–42 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ben-Daya, M., Hariga, M.: Integrated single vendor single buyer model with stochastic demand and variable lead time. Int. J. Product. Econom. 92, 75–80 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hsiao, J., Lin, C.: A buyer-vendor EOQ model with changeable lead-time in supply chain. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 26, 917–921 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sajadieh, M.S., Akbari-Jokar, M.R.: An integrated vendor buyer cooperative model under stochastic supply lead-time. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 41, 1043–1050 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giri, B.C., Maiti, T.: Supply chain Model for a deteriorating product with time-varying demand and production rate. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 63, 665–673 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glock, C.H.: A multiple-vendor single-buyer integrated inventory model with a variable number of vendors. Comput. Ind. Eng. 60, 173–182 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, Y., Huang, X.: A one-vendor multiple-buyer production-distribution system: The value of vendor managed inventory. INFOR 53, 13–25 (2015)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jauhari, W.A.: Integrated vendor-buyer model with defective items, inspection error and stochastic demand. Int. J. Math. Oper. Res. 8(3), 342–359 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hariga, M., Asad, R., Khan, Z.: Manufacturing-remanufacturing policies for a centralized two stage supply chain under consignment stock partnership. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 183, 262–274 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hossain, S.J.M., Ohaiba, M.M., Sarker, B.R.: An optimal vendor-buyer cooperative policy under generalized lead-time distribution with penalty cost for delivery lateness. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 188, 50–62 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goyal, S.K., Giri, B.C.: Recent trend in modeling of deteriorating inventory: an invited review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 134, 1–16 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chun, Y.H., Tang, K.: Determining the optimal warranty price based on the producers and customers risk preferences. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 85, 97–110 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yeh, R.H., Ho, W.T., Tseng, S.T.: Optimal poduction run length for products sold with warranty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 20(3), 575–582 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen, C.K., Lo, C.C.: Optimal production run length for products sold with warranty in an imperfect production system with allowable shortages. Math. Comput. Model. 44, 319–331 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations