Impact of Bioenergy on Environmental Sustainability

  • Kankan Kishore PathakEmail author
  • Sangeeta Das
Part of the Energy, Environment, and Sustainability book series (ENENSU)


Energy and environments are vital elements to our daily life and a way forward for our viable development. The fossil fuels are widely used as primary energy sources that threaten its depletion along with the formation of various harmful greenhouse gases. This necessitates for efficient utilization of energy and the access to the alternative energy resources like bioenergy. It is always being a major concerned for bioenergy deployment while referring to availability of the biomass, competition between the various uses of biomass and the sustainability issues. In spite of its wide applications, there is less study on the environmental effects of bioenergy. This enthuse the challenges that calls for multidisciplinary researches related to environmental sustainability. Production of bioenergy conveys significant prospects to provide a series of environmental, social, economic benefits in addition to the energy and climate goals. In order to open up better chances for agricultural souk and to endorse sustainable growth in rural community, bioenergy plays a vital role. Proper planning and management might yield multiple benefits using bioenergy synergies with the production of food, water, ecosystems and health. This chapter addresses a survey on pertinent literature related to the environmental sustainability arising from the production of bioenergy. In this context, the chapter also deals with the bioconversion technologies and its impact on environment and applications, greenhouse gases and biodiversity, etc.


Bioenergy Bioenergy production Environmental sustainability Economic benefits 


  1. Akhtar J, Amin NAS (2012) A review on operating parameters for optimum liquid oil yield in biomass pyrolysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(7):5101–5109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aysu T, Küçük MM (2014) Biomass pyrolysis in a fixed-bed reactor: effects of pyrolysis parameters on product yields and characterization of products. Energy 64:1002–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben H, Ragauskas AJ (2013) Comparison for the compositions of fast and slow pyrolysis oils by NMR characterization. Bioresour Technol 147:577–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biller P, Ross AB (2011) Potential yields and properties of oil from the hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae with different biochemical content. Bioresour Technol 102(1):215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biller P, Ross AB, Skill SC, Lea-Langton A, Balasundaram B, Hall C, Riley R, Llewellyn CA (2012) Nutrient recycling of aqueous phase for microalgae cultivation from the hydrothermal liquefaction process. Algal Res 1(1):70–76Google Scholar
  6. Blanco-Canqui H, Wortmann C (2017) Crop residue removal and soil erosion by wind. J Soil Water Conserv 72(5):97A–104ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown RA, Rosenberg NJ, Hays CJ, Easterlling WE, Mearns LO (2000) Potential production and environmental effects of switchgrass and traditional crops under current and greenhouse-altered climate in the central United States: a simulation study. Agric Ecosyst Environ 78:31–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan KY, Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2007) Agronomic values of green waste biochar as a soil amendment. Aust J Soil Res 45:629–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng W (2009) Rhizosphere priming effect: its functional relationships with microbial turnover, evapotranspiration, and C-N budgets. Soil Biol Biochem 41(9):1795–1801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cibin R, Trybula E, Chaubey I, Brouder SM, Volenec JJ (2016) Watershed-scale impacts of bioenergy crops on hydrology and water quality using improved SWAT model. GCB Bioenergy 8(4):837–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooney D, Kim H, Quinn L, Lee MS, Guo J, Chen S, Xu B, Lee DK (2017) Switchgrass as a bioenergy crop in the Loess plateau, China: potential lignocellulosic feedstock production and environmental conservation. J Integr Agric 16(6):1211–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Correa DF, Beyer HL, Possingham HP, Thomas-Hall SR, Schenk PM (2017) Biodiversity impacts of bioenergy production: microalgae vs. first generation biofuels. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 74:1131–1146Google Scholar
  13. De Andrés JM, Roche E, Narros A, Rodríguez ME (2016) Characterisation of tar from sewage sludge gasification. Influence of gasifying conditions: temperature, throughput, steam and use of primary catalysts. Fuel 180:116–126Google Scholar
  14. de Man R, German L (2017) Certifying the sustainability of biofuels: promise and reality. Energy Policy 109:871–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drewniak BA, Mishra U, Song J, Prell J, Kotamarthi VR (2015) Modeling the impact of agricultural land use and management on US carbon budgets. Biogeosciences 12(7):2119–2129Google Scholar
  16. Dunn JB, Mueller S, Ho-young K, Wang MQ (2013) Land-use change and greenhouse gas emissions from corn and cellulosic ethanol. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. El-Chichakli B, von Joachim B, Christine L, Daniel B, Jim P (2016) Policy: five cornerstones of a global bioeconomy. Nature 535(7611):221–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Energy Independence and Security Act (2007) A summary of major provisions internet source.
  19. Environmental Protection Authority Act (2011) Internet source:
  20. Farhana Azman N, Abdeshahian P, Al-Shorgani NKN, Hamid AA, Kalil MS (2016) Production of hydrogen energy from dilute acid-hydrolyzed palm oil mill effluent in dark fermentation using an empirical model. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41(37):16373–16384Google Scholar
  21. Field JL, Tanger P, Shackley SJ, Haefele SM (2016) Agricultural residue gasification for low-cost, low-carbon decentralized power: an empirical case study in Cambodia. Appl Energy 177:612–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fu J, Jiang D, Huang Y, Zhuang D, Ji W (2014) Evaluating the marginal land resources suitable for developing bioenergy in Asia. Adv Meteorol 2014:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gai C, Zhang Y, Chen W, Zhang P, Dong Y (2015) An investigation of reaction pathways of hydrothermal liquefaction using Chlorella pyrenoidosa and Spirulina platensis. Energy Convers Manag 96:330–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gasparatos A, Stromberg P, Takeuchi K (2011) Biofuels, ecosystem services and human wellbeing: putting biofuels in the ecosystem services narrative. Agric Ecosyst Environ 142(3–4):111–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glaser B, Parr M, Braun C, Kopolo G (2009) Biochar is carbon negative. Nat Geosci 2(1):2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goyal HB, Seal D, Saxena RC (2008) Bio-fuels from thermochemical conversion of renewable resources: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12(2):504–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guo F, Zhong Z (2018) Optimization of the co-combustion of coal and composite biomass pellets. J Clean Prod 185:399–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guo T, Cibin R, Chaubey I, Gitau M, Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Kiniry JR, Engel BA (2018) Evaluation of bioenergy crop growth and the impacts of bioenergy crops on streamflow, tile drain flow and nutrient losses in an extensively tile-drained watershed using SWAT. Sci Total Environ 613–614:724–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris ZM, Spake R, Taylor G (2015) Land use change to bioenergy: a meta-analysis of soil carbon and GHG emissions. Biomass Bioenergy 82:27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoekman SK, Broch A, Liu X (2018) Environmental implications of higher ethanol production and use in the US: a literature review. Part I—impacts on water, soil, and air quality. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:3140–3158Google Scholar
  31. Immerzeel DJ, Verweij PA, van der Hilst F, Faaij APC (2014) Biodiversity impacts of bioenergy crop production: a state-of-the-art review. GCB Bioenergy 6(3):183–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. International Energy Agency (2018) Internet source: renewables 2018.
  33. Jiang D, Zhuang D, Fu J, Huang Y, Wen K (2012) Bioenergy potential from crop residues in China: availability and distribution. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(3):1377–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jiang D, Hao M, Fu J, Zhuang D, Huang Y (2014) Spatial-temporal variation of marginal land suitable for energy plants from 1990 to 2010 in China. Sci Rep 4:5816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jiang H, Zhang H, Chen Q, Mei C, Liu G (2015) Recent advances in electronic nose techniques for monitoring of fermentation process. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 31(12):1845–1852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kan T, Strezov V, Evans TJ (2016) Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: a review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 57:1126–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Khan BH (2017) Non-conventional energy resources, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill EducationGoogle Scholar
  38. Khanmohammadi S, Saadat-Targhi M, Al-Rashed AAAA, Afrand M (2019) Thermodynamic and economic analyses and multi-objective optimization of harvesting waste heat from a biomass gasifier integrated system by thermoelectric generator. Energy Convers Manag 195:1022–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kijo-Kleczkowska A, Środa K, Kosowska-Golachowska M, Musiał T, Wolski K (2016) Experimental research of sewage sludge with coal and biomass co-combustion, in pellet form. Waste Manag 53:165–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kim HK, Parajuli PB, Filip To SD (2013) Assessing impacts of bioenergy crops and climate change on hydrometeorology in the Yazoo river basin, Mississippi. Agric For Meteorol 169:61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kreyenschulte D, Emde F, Regestein L, Büchs J (2016) Computational minimization of the specific energy demand of large-scale aerobic fermentation processes based on small scale data. Chem Eng Sci 153:270–283Google Scholar
  42. Kwietniewska E, Tys J (2014) Process characteristics, inhibition factors and methane yields of anaerobic digestion process, with particular focus on microalgal biomass fermentation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 34:491–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lal R (2005) World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel. Environ Int 31(4):575–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee Y, Park J, Ryu C, Gang KS, Yang W, Park YK (2013) Comparison of biochar properties from biomass residues produced by slow pyrolysis at 500 °C. Bioresour Technol 148:196–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lee SH, Lee TH, Jeong SM, Lee JM (2019) Economic analysis of a 600 MWe ultra supercritical circulating fluidized bed power plant based on coal tax and biomass co-combustion plans. Renew Energy 138:121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lehmann J (2007) A handful of carbon. Nature 447:143–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lehmann J, Silva JP, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B (2003) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological anthrosol and a ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249:343–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems: a review. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 11:403–427Google Scholar
  49. Li W, Dang Q, Brown RC, Laird D, Wright MM (2017) The impacts of biomass properties on pyrolysis yields, economic and environmental performance of the pyrolysis-bioenergy-biochar platform to carbon negative energy. Bioresour Technol 241:959–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Liu T, McConkey BG, Ma Z, Liu Z, Li X, Cheng L (2011) Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis of bioenergy production on marginal land. Energy Procedia 5:2378–2386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Liu W, Yan J, Li J, Sang T (2012) Yield potential of Miscanthus energy crops in the Loess plateau of China. GCB Bioenergy 4(5):545–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Liu T, Huffman T, Kulshreshtha S, McConkey B, Du Y, Green M, Liu J, Shang J, Geng X (2017) Bioenergy production on marginal land in Canada: potential, economic feasibility and greenhouse gas emissions impacts. Appl Energy 205:477–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mallick D, Mahanta P, Moholkar VS (2017) Co-gasification of coal and biomass blends: chemistry and engineering. Fuel 204:106–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mallick D, Mahanta P, Moholkar VS (2018) Synergistic effects in gasification of coal/biomass blends: analysis and review. In: Coal and biomass gasification, pp 473–497Google Scholar
  55. Manara P, Zabaniotou A (2013) Co-pyrolysis of biodiesel-derived glycerol with Greek lignite: a laboratory study. J Anal Appl Pyrol 100:166–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Manning P, Taylor G, Hanley ME (2015) Bioenergy, food production and biodiversity—an unlikely alliance? GCB Bioenergy 7(4):570–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McCalmont JP, Hastings A, McNamara NP, Richter GM, Robson P, Donnison IS, Clifton-Brown J (2017) Environmental costs and benefits of growing Miscanthus for bioenergy in the UK. GCB Bioenergy 9(3):489–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Müller A, Weigelt J, Götz A, Schmidt O, Lobos Alva I, Matuschke I, Ehling U, Beringer T (2015) The role of biomass in the sustainable development goals: a reality check and governance implications. Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam. Available from:
  59. Nualsri C, Reungsang A, Plangklang P (2016) Biochemical hydrogen and methane potential of sugarcane syrup using a two-stage anaerobic fermentation process. Ind Crop Prod 82:88–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Oliveira R (2004) Design of a stable adaptive controller for driving aerobic fermentation processes near maximum oxygen transfer capacity. J Process Control 14(6):617–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ouyang W, Lai X, Li X, Liu H, Lin C, Hao F (2015) Soil respiration and carbon loss relationship with temperature and land use conversion in freeze–thaw agricultural area. Sci Total Environ 533:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ozturk M, Saba N, Altay V, Iqbal R, Hakeem KR, Jawaid M, Ibrahim FH (2017) Biomass and bioenergy: an overview of the development potential in Turkey and Malaysia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 79:1285–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Panwar NL, Kothari R, Tyagi VV (2012) Thermo chemical conversion of biomass ecofriendly energy routes. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(4):1801–1816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Patwardhan PR (2010) Understanding the product distribution from biomass fast pyrolysis. Graduate theses and dissertations. Paper 11767.
  65. Pourhashem G, Rasool QZ, Zhang R, Medlock KB, Cohan DS, Masiello CA (2017) Valuing the air quality effects of biochar reductions on soil NO emissions. Environ Sci Technol 51(17):9856–9863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Qin Z, Dunn JB, Kwon H, Mueller S, Wander MM (2016) Influence of spatially dependent, modeled soil carbon emission factors on life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of corn and cellulosic ethanol. GCB Bioenergy 8(6):1136–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Qin Z, Zhuang Q, Cai X, He Y, Huang Y, Jiang D, Lin E, Liu Y, Tang Y, Wangn MQ (2018) Biomass and biofuels in China: toward bioenergy resource potentials and their impacts on the environment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82:2387–2400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Robertson GP, Grace PR, Izaurralde RC, Parton WP, Zhang X (2014) CO2 emissions from crop residue-derived biofuels. Nat Clim Change 4(11):933–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rowe RL, Street NR, Taylor G (2009) Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(1):271–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sang T, Zhu W (2011) China’s bioenergy potential. GCB Bioenergy 3(2):79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schroder P, Beckers B, Daniels S, Gnadinger F, Maestri E, Marmiroli N, Mench M, Millan R, Obermeier MM, Oustriere N, Persson T, Poschenrieder C, Rineau F, Rutkowska B, Schmid T, Szulc W, Witters N, Saebo A (2018) Intensify production, transform biomass to energy and novel goods and protect soils in Europe—a vision how to mobilize marginal lands. Sci Total Environ 616–617:1101–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, Tokgoz S, Hayes D, Yu T-H (2008) Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1238–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sheehan JJ, Adler PR, Del Grosso SJ, Easter M, Parton W, Paustian K, Williams S (2014) CO2 emissions from crop residue-derived biofuels. Nat Clim Change 4(11):932–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sivan K (2006) Bioenergy and agriculture: promises and challenges. Environmental effects of bioenergy.
  75. Souza GM, Ballester MVR, de Brito Cruz CH, Chum H, Dale B, Dale VH, Fernandes ECM, Foust T, Karp A, Lynd L, MacielFilho R, Milanez A, Nigro F, Osseweijer P, Verdade LM, Victoria RL, Van der Wielen L (2017) The role of bioenergy in a climate-changing world. Environ Dev 23:57–64Google Scholar
  76. Stupak I, Joudrey J, Tattersall Smith C, Pelkmans L, Chum H, Cowie A, Englund O, Sheng Goh C, Junginger M (2016) A global survey of stakeholder views and experiences for systems needed to effectively and efficiently govern sustainability of bioenergy. WIREs Energy Environ 5(1):89–118Google Scholar
  77. Tock JY, Lai CL, Lee KT, Tan KT, Bhatia S (2010) Banana biomass as potential renewable energy resource: a Malaysian case study. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(2):798–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wang M, Han J, Dunn JB, Cai H, Elgowainy A (2012) Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use. Environ Res Lett 7(4):045905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Warren Raffa D, Bogdanski A, Tittonell P (2015) How does crop residue removal affect soil organic carbon and yield? A hierarchical analysis of management and environmental factors. Biomass Bioenergy 81:345–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Werling BP, Dickson TL, Rufus I, Hannah G, Claudio G, Gross KL, Heidi L, Malmstrom CM, Meehan TD, Ruan L, Roberston BA, Roberston GP, Schmidt TM, Schrotenboer AC, Teal TK, Wilson JK, Landis DA (2013) Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes. PNAS 111(4):1652–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wicke B, Smeets E, Watson H, Faaij A (2011) The current bioenergy production potential of semi-arid and arid regions in sub-Saharan Africa. Biomass Bioenergy 35(7):2773–2786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wielgosiński G, Łechtańska P, Namiecińska O (2017) Emission of some pollutants from biomass combustion in comparison to hard coal combustion. J Energy Inst 90(5):787–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Williams AG, Audsley E, Sandars DL (2010) Environmental burdens of producing bread wheat, oilseed rape and potatoes in England and Wales using simulation and system modelling. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(8):855–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wu Y, Liu S (2012) Impacts of biofuels production alternatives on water quantity and quality in the Iowa river basin. Biomass Bioenergy 36:182–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wu Y, Liu S, Young CJ, Dahal D, Sohl TL, Davis B (2015) Projection of corn production and stover-harvesting impacts on soil organic carbon dynamics in the US temperate prairies. Sci Rep 5:10830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wu Y, Zhao F, Liu S, Wang L, Qiu L, Alexandrov G, Jothiprakash V (2018) Bioenergy production and environmental impacts. Geosci Lett 5:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Xiu S, Shahbazi A (2012) Bio-oil production and upgrading research: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:4406–4414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zabaniotou A (2014) Agro-residues implication in decentralized CHP production through a thermochemical conversion system with SOFC. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 6:34–50Google Scholar
  89. Zhang L, Xu CC, Champagne P (2010) Overview of recent advances in thermo-chemical conversion of biomass. Energy Convers Manag 51(5):969–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhang T, Yang Y, Xie D (2015) Insights into the production potential and trends of China’s rural biogas. Int J Energy Res 39(8):1068–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zhou X, Clark CD, Nair SS, Hawkins SA, Lambert DM (2015) Environmental and economic analysis of using SWAT to simulate the effects of switchgrass production on water quality in an impaired watershed. Agric Water Manag 160:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zhu Z, Sohail S, Rosendahl L, Yu D, Chen G (2015) Influence of alkali catalyst on product yield and properties via hydrothermal liquefaction of barley straw. Energy 80:284–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringGirijananda Chowdhury Institute of Management and TechnologyGuwahatiIndia

Personalised recommendations