Advertisement

Beijing Qihoo Technology Co., Ltd. v. Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. (Dispute over the Abuse of Market Dominant Position)—Analysis Methods and Ideas for the Definition of the Relevant Markets and the Abuse of Market Dominant Position in the Internet Environment

Chapter
Part of the Library of Selected Cases from the Chinese Court book series (LSCCPC)

Abstract

In the cases of abuse of market dominant position, the definition of the relevant market is a tool for assessing the market power of the operator and the impact of the alleged monopolistic behavior on the competition. And the definition of the relevant market is not the purpose. If the direct evidence can be given to exclude or obstruct the competition and the market position of the operator and the market impact of the alleged monopolistic behavior can be assessed, then there is no need to clearly define the relevant market in every case of abuse of market dominant position.

Reference

  1. 1.
    Zhu Li, “Legal Boundaries of Competition in the Area of Internet: Challenges and Judicial Responses”, Competition Policy Research, 1, 2015, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Law Press China 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of ChinaBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations