Panjin Urban Construction and Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. v. Xu X (Dispute over Real Estate Sales Contract)—When One Litigant Applies for Retrial, Whether Its Provision of Criminal Investigation Material of the Other Suspected of Committing a Crime is Sufficient to Overturn Facts Found in the Original Judgment

  • Xiaoguang FengEmail author
Part of the Library of Selected Cases from the Chinese Court book series (LSCCPC)


Based on the principle of high probability of evidence, the trial court finds that the contract-issuing party’s use of its commercial housing to offset project payment in arrears and the following conclusion of the sales contract of commercial housing with the actual constructor is valid.

Copyright information

© Law Press China 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of ChinaBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations