Advertisement

Investigation of Influence of Injection Pressure on Gasoline Fuel Spray Characteristics Using Numerical Simulation

  • Sandip WadekarEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Energy, Environment, and Sustainability book series (ENENSU)

Abstract

Maximum fuel injection pressure in gasoline direct injection engine is expected to increase because of its potential to reduce emissions while maintaining a high efficiency in spark ignition engine. Present gasoline injectors in the market operates in the range of 20–30 MPa. Because of many positive effects of high injection pressure for the emission reduction and fuel efficiency, an interest has been developed to investigate the spray behavior at around 40 MPa, 60 MPa and even more higher injection pressure. A fundamental investigation of spray characteristics at high-pressure injection will help to develop the understanding of spray behavior at such elevated pressure. In the present study, a gasoline fuel spray was studied through the numerical model at an injection pressure ranging from 40 to 150 MPa. A numerical simulation was performed in an optical accessible constant volume chamber. The chamber was effectively non-reacting and non-vaporizing condition since the focus was on the spray droplets. In the numerical model, gas flow was calculated by large-eddy simulation (LES) method and the liquid phase was accounted by a standard Lagrangian spray model. The fuel spray atomization was modelled using the Kelvin Helmholtz—Rayleigh Taylor (KH-RT) model, and droplet size distribution followed the Rosin-Rammler distribution function. Simulation results were validated by comparing the liquid penetration length of spray with the experimental data at different fuel injection pressures. Then, the mean droplet sizes such as arithmetic mean diameter and Sauter mean diameter of the spray droplets were compared with the measure droplet sizes as a function of pressure. The spray droplet size distribution was also shown along with measured droplet sizes. The result shows that the liquid length penetration of the spray was significantly increases together with the higher probability of smaller droplet by increasing the fuel injection pressure. Moreover, the mean droplet sizes were also reducing by increasing the fuel injection pressure, such as the droplet SMD was reduced from 13.5 to 7.5 \( \upmu \)m by injecting the fuel at pressure 150 MPa instead of 40 MPa.

Keywords

Gasoline high pressure injection Large-eddy simulation Spray modelling 

References

  1. Allocca L, Bartolucci L, Cordiner S, Lazzaro M et al (2018) ECN spray G injector: assessment of numerical modeling accuracy. SAE technical paper 2018-01-0306.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0306
  2. Apte SV, Gorokhovski M, Moin C (2003) LES of atomizing spray with stochastic modeling of secondary breakup. Int J Multiph Flow 29(9).  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-9322(03)00111-3
  3. Banerjee S, Rutland C (2012) On LES grid criteria for spray induced turbulence. SAE technical paper 2012-01-0141.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0141
  4. Buri S, Kubach H, Spicher U (2010) Effects of increased injection pressures of up to 1000 Bar-opportunities in stratified operation in a direct-injection spark-ignition engine. Int J Engine Res.  https://doi.org/10.1243/14680874JER608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chrigui M, Sadiki A, Ahmadi G (2004) Study of interaction in spray between evaporating droplets and turbulence using second order turbulence RANS modelling and a lagrangian approach. Prog Comput Fluid Dyn.  https://doi.org/10.1504/PCFD.2004.004084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kim K, Kim D, Jung Y, Bae C (2013) Spray and combustion characteristics of gasoline and diesel in a direct injection compression ignition engine. Fuel.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.02.060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Matousek T, Dageforde H, Bertsch M (2013) Influence of injection pressures up to 300 Bar on particle emissions in a GDI engine. In: 17th ETH conference on combustion generated nanoparticlesGoogle Scholar
  8. Medina M, Fatouraie M, Wooldridge M (2018) High-speed imaging studies of gasoline fuel sprays at fuel injection pressures from 300 to 1500 Bar. SAE technical paper 2018-01-0294.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0294
  9. Mitroglou N, Nouri J, Yan Y, Gavaises M et al (2007) Spray structure generated by multi-hole injectors for gasoline direct-injection engines. SAE technical paper 2007-01-1417.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-1417
  10. Paredi D, Lucchini T, D’Errico G, Onorati A (2018) Combined experimental and numerical investigation of the ECN spray G under different engine-like conditions. SAE technical paper 2018-01-0281.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0281
  11. Payri R, García A, Domenech V, Durrett R et al (2012) An experimental study of gasoline effects on injection rate, momentum flux and spray characteristics using a common rail diesel injection system. Fuel.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.11.065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pera C, Réveillon J, Vervisch L, Domingo P (2006) Modeling subgrid scale mixture fraction variance in LES of evaporating spray. Combust Flame.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2006.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Piock WF, Pinter A, Fraidl GK (2002) Gasoline direct injection and engine boosting. SAE TOPTEC, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  14. Reitz R (1987) Modeling atomization processes in high-pressure vaporizing sprays. Atomization spray technologyGoogle Scholar
  15. Rolf R (1999) Modeling spray atomization with the Kelvin-Helmholtz/Rayleigh-Taylor hybrid model. AtIzation Spray Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1615/AtomizSpr.v9.i6.40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosin P, Rammler E (1933) The laws governing the fineness of powdered coal. J Inst FuelGoogle Scholar
  17. Rutland CJ (2011) Large-eddy simulations for internal combustion engines-a review. Int J Engine Res.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1468087411407248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Senecal P, Pomraning E, Richards K, Som S (2013) An investigation of grid convergence for spray simulations using an LES turbulence model. SAE technical paper 2013-01-1083.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-1083
  19. Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. the basic experiment. Mon Wea Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091%3c0099:gcewtp%3e2.3.co;2
  20. The open source CFD toolbox (2014) http://www.openfoam.com
  21. Tian J, Zhao M, Long W, Nishida K et al (2016) Experimental study on spray characteristics under ultra-high injection pressure for DISI Engines. Fuel.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.08.086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wadekar S, Yamaguchi A, Oevermann M (2019) Large-eddy simulation on the effects of fuel injection pressure on the gasoline spray characteristics. SAE technical paper 2019-01-0060.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0060
  23. Waltner A, Lueckert P, Schaupp U, Rau E, Kemmler R, Weller R (2006) Future technology of the spark-ignition engine: spray-guided direct injection with piezo injector. In: 27th vienna motor symposiumGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang Y, Lee W, Reitz R, Diwakar R (2011) Numerical simulation of diesel sprays using an eulerian-lagrangian spray and atomization (ELSA) model coupled with nozzle flow. SAE technical paper 2011-01-0386.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-0386

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chalmers University of TechnologyGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations