Advertisement

Simulation and Optical Diagnostics for Internal Combustion Engines

Current Status and Way Forward
  • Koji YasutomiEmail author
  • Tsukasa Hori
  • Jiro Senda
Chapter
Part of the Energy, Environment, and Sustainability book series (ENENSU)

Abstract

Enhancing the predictability of diesel spray numerical simulation, a droplet breakup model has been developed and optimized under non-evaporative diesel spray with a large-eddy simulation. In the spray simulation community, the model called Kelvin–Helmholtz and Rayleigh–Taylor model has been widely used even nowadays, both of which are modeled for high Weber number conditions. While upstream region of spray considers as high Weber number thanks to high injection pressure, downstream of the spray represents by low Weber number region. In this study, a hybrid breakup model which combines the Kelvin–Helmholtz and modified Taylor analogy breakup has been proposed. The Kelvin–Helmholtz and modified Taylor analogy breakup models are used to the primary and secondary breakup models, respectively. For validating the breakup model, one of the unique optical diagnostics techniques has been introduced to capture both macroscopic and microscopic spray characteristics at the same time. The system called super high spatial resolution photography lens is able to capture sufficient area of the spray with having a 5 µm spatial resolution. Spray simulations under non-evaporative condition were performed to validate the Kelvin–Helmholtz–modified Taylor analogy breakup model. It is found that the simulation results of Kelvin–Helmholtz–Modified Taylor analogy breakup are in good agreement with experimental measurements of droplet distribution under non-evaporative spray.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (17360102). In addition, part of this work was supported by ‘‘Academic frontier promotion work’’ through an academic research promotion grant to private universities by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology to support ‘‘Next-generation zero-emission energy-conversion system’’ (S0901038: 2009–2013).

References

  1. Beale JC, Reitz RD (1999) Modeling spray atomization with the Kelvin-Helmholtz/Rayleigh-Taylor hybrid model. Atomizat Sprays 9(6):623–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Di Mauro A, Chen H, Sick V (2019) Neural network prediction of cycle-to-cycle power variability in a spark-ignited internal combustion engine. Proc Combust Inst 37(4):4937–4944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Enaux B, Granet V, Vermorel O, Lacour C, Pera C, Angelberger C, Poinsot T (2011) LES study of cycle-to-cycle variations in a spark ignition engine. Proc Combust Inst 33(2):3115–3122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fujii Tatsunori, Kitaguchi Koji, Hatori Soichi, Hori Tsukasa, Senda Jiro (2015) Development of breakup model for large eddy simulation of diesel spray. J Energy Power Eng 7(12):2312–2320Google Scholar
  5. Goryntsev D, Sadiki A, Klein M, Janicka J (2009) Large eddy simulation based analysis of the effects of cycle-to-cycle variations on air-fuel mixing in realistic DISI IC-engines. In: Proceedings of the combustion institute, vol 32 II, no 2, pp 2759–2766Google Scholar
  6. Granet V, Vermorel O, Lacour C, Enaux B, Dugué V, Poinsot T (2012) Large-Eddy Simulation and experimental study of cycle-to-cycle variations of stable and unstable operating points in a spark ignition engine. Combust Flame 159(4):1562–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hanasaki M, Komae J, Hori T, Matsumura E, Senda J (2015) Large Eddy Simulation of diesel spray using OpenFOAM. Trans Soc Autom Eng Japan 47(2):20155110Google Scholar
  8. Hori T, Kuge T, Senda J, Fujimoto H (2007) Large Eddy simulation of diesel spray combustion with Eddy-dissipation model and CIP method by use of KIVALES. SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0247Google Scholar
  9. Kamata S, Katsuta K, Hori T, Senda J, Fujimoto H (2008) Visualization of diesel spray by using direct photography with high spatial resolution. Atomiza J ILASS-Japan 17(58):23–30Google Scholar
  10. Kitaguchi K, Hatori S, Hori T, Senda J (2012) Optimization of breakup model using les of diesel spray. Atomizat Sprays 22(1):57–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kitaguchi K, Fujii T, Hatori S, Hori T, Senda J (2014) Effect of breakup model on large-eddy simulation of diesel spray evolution under high back pressures. Int J Engine Res 15(5):522–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kodavasal J, Moiz AA, Ameen M, Som S (2018) Machine learning analysis of factors impacting cycle-to-cycle variation in a gasoline spark-ignited engine. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2017 internal combustion engine division fall technical conference ICEF2017 October 15–18, 2017, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2017, November 2018Google Scholar
  13. Levich VG (1963) Physicochemical hydrodynamics. J Chem Educ 40(10):A827Google Scholar
  14. Liu AB, Mather D, Reitz RD (1993) Modeling the effects of drop drag and breakup on fuel sprays. SAE Technical Paper, 930072Google Scholar
  15. Marubayashi N, Yano T, Hori T, Senda J, Fujimoto H (2011) The time sequence measurement of diesel spray by using of super high resolution photography. Atomizat J ILASS-Japan 20(70):106–113Google Scholar
  16. Masouleh MG, Keskinen K, Kaario O, Kahila H, Karimkashi S, Vuorinen V (2018) Modeling cycle-to-cycle variations in spark ignited combustion engines by scale-resolving simulations for different engine speeds. Appl Energy 250:801–820Google Scholar
  17. Nguyen T, Janas P, Lucchini T, D’Errico G, Kaiser S, Kempf A (2014) LES of flow processes in an SI engine using two approaches: OpenFoam and PsiPhi. SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1121Google Scholar
  18. Pasunurthi S, Jupudi R, Wijeyakulasuriya S, Gubba SR, Im HG, Jaasim M, Primus R, Klingbeil A, Finney C (2017) Cycle to cycle variation study in a dual fuel operated engine. SAE Technical Paper, 2017-01-0772Google Scholar
  19. Sone K, Patel N, Menon S (2000a) Implementations of large-eddy simulation into KIVA code—part 1: theory and formulation. Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  20. Sone K, Patel N, Menon S (2000b) Implementations of large-eddy simulation into KIVA code—part 2: practicums on implementation. Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  21. Sone K, Patel N, Menon S (2001) Large-eddy simulation of fuel-air mixing in an internal combustion engine. In: 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences MeetingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hino Motors Ltd.TokyoJapan
  2. 2.Osaka UniversitySuitaJapan
  3. 3.Doshisha UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations