Advertisement

Development of Firefly Algorithm Interface for Parameter Optimization of Electrochemical-Based Machining Processes

  • D. SinghEmail author
  • R. S. Shukla
Chapter
Part of the Springer Tracts in Nature-Inspired Computing book series (STNIC)

Abstract

Manufacturing of micro complex profiles is a challenging task which is time consuming and expensive. The optimum parameter setting of machining process is essential to obtained desired profile on the workpiece with higher material removal rate. To achieve this purpose, a graphical user interface (GUI) is developed that associates metaheuristic technique, the firefly algorithm (FA). The developed GUI can be used effectively by the user for obtaining the optimal solution of non-traditional machining (NTM) processes. The GUI is tested on three NTM processes, namely electrochemical machining (ECM), electrochemical micro-machining (EMM), and electrochemical turning (ECT) and the results show the effectiveness of interface accompanying with the considered FA algorithm. The results for ECM, EMM, and ECT processes obtained using the considered metaheuristics techniques are compared with other algorithms, such as genetic algorithm (GA), artificial bee colony (ABC), and biogeography-based algorithm (BBO). It is observed that the value of MRR is improved by 12.3%, 78.7%, and 20.5% with respect to BBO algorithm in ECM, EMM, and ECT process, respectively. Similarly, the response value of surface characteristics like width overcut, linear overcut, surface roughness, and roundness error is reduced to negligible in the considered processes.

Keywords

Graphical user interface Firefly algorithm Optimization technique Electrochemical machining Electrochemical micro-machining Electrochemical turning 

References

  1. 1.
    Rajurkar KP, Zhu D, Mcgeough JA, De Silva A (1999) New developments in electro-chemical machining. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 48:567–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jain NK, Jain VK (2001) Modeling of material removal in mechanical type advanced machining processes: a state-of-art review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:1573–1635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bi ZM, Wang L (2012) Optimization of machining processes from the perspective of energy consumption: a case study. J Manuf Syst 31:420–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Suriano S, Wang H, Hu SJ (2012) Sequential monitoring of surface spatial variation in automotive machining processes based on high definition metrology. J Manuf Syst 31:8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jain NK, Jain VK (2007) Optimization of electro-chemical machining process parameters using genetic algorithms. Mach Sci Technol 11:235–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chakradhar D, Gopal AV (2011) Multi-objective optimization of electrochemical machining of EN31 steel by grey relational analysis. Int J Model Opt 1(2):113–117Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Das S, Chakraborty S (2011) Selection of non-traditional machining processes using analytic network process. J Manuf Syst 30:41–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Das MK, Kumar K, Barman T, Sahoo P (2014) Optimization of surface roughness and MRR in electrochemical machining of EN31 tool steel using grey-Taguchi approach. Procedia Mater Sci 6:729–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhattacharyya B, Sorkhel SK (1998) Investigation for controlled electrochemical machining through response surface methodology-based approach. J Mater Process Technol 86:200–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schulze HP, Schatzing W (2013) Influences of different contaminations on the electro-erosive and the electrochemical micro-machining. Procedia CIRP 6:58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Senthilkumar C, Ganeshan G, Karthikeyan R (2011) Parametric optimization of electrochemical machining of Al/15% SiCp composites using NSGA-II. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc 21:2294–2300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hinduja S, Kunieda M (2013) Modelling of ECM and EDM processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62:775–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tang L, Yang S (2013) Experimental investigation on the electrochemical machining of 00Cr12Ni9Mo4Cu2 material and multi-objective parameters optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:2909–2916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ayyappan S, Sivakumar K (2015) Enhancing the performance of electrochemical machining of 20MnCr5 alloy steel optimization of process parameters by PSO-DF optimizer. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82:2053–2064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Munda J, Bhattacharyya B (2006) Investigation into electrochemical micromachining (EMM) through response surface methodology based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35:821–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chae J, Park SS, Freihei T (2006) Investigation of micro-cutting operations. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:313–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dornfeld D, Min S, Takeuchi Y (2006) Recent advances in mechanical micromachining. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 55:745–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Samanta S, Chakraborty S (2011) Parametric optimization of some non-traditional machining processes using artificial bee colony algorithm. Eng Appl Artif Intell 24:946–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    He H, Zeng Y, Qu N (2015) An investigation into wire electrochemical micro machining of pure tungsten. Precis Eng 45:285–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goud M, Sharma AK, Jawalkar C (2015) A review on material removal mechanism in electrochemical discharge machining (ECDM) possibilities to enhance the material removal rate. Precis Eng 45:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hajian M, Razfar MR, Movahed S (2016) An experimental study on the effect of magnetic field orientations and electrolyte concentrations on ECDM milling performance of glass. Precis Eng 45:322–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kao PS, Hocheng H (2003) Optimization of electrochemical polishing of stainless steel by grey relational analysis. J Mater Process Technol 140:255–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fister I, Yang XS, Brest JA (2013) Comprehensive review of firefly algorithms. Swarm Evol Comput 13:34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gandomi AH, Yang X, Talatahari S, Alavi AH (2013) Firefly algorithm with chaos. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 18:89–98MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zaki EM, El-sawy AA (2013) Hybridizing ant colony optimization with firefly algorithm for unconstrained optimization problems. Appl Math Comput 224:473–483MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mukherjee R, Chakraborty S (2013) Selection of the optimal electrochemical machining process parameters using biogeography-based optimization algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64:781–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    El-Taweel TA, Gouda SA (2011) Performance analysis of wire electrochemical turning process—RSM approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Malapati M, Bhattacharyya B (2011) Investigation into electrochemical micromachining process during micro-channel generation. Mater Manuf Process 26:1019–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yang XS (2008) Nature-inspired metaheuristics algorithm, 2nd edn. Luniver Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Singh D, Shukla RS (2016) Optimisation of electrochemical micromachining and electrochemical discharge machining process parameters using firefly algorithm. Int J Mech Manuf Sys 9(2):137–159Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shukla RS, Singh D (2017) Selection of parameters for advanced machining processes using firefly algorithm. Eng Sci Technol Int J 20(1):212–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chapman SJ (2008) Matab® programming for engineers. Thomson Asia Ltd, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hahn BH, Valentine DT (2010) Essential Matlab for engineers and scientist. Elsevier Academic Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tapie L, Mawussi B, Bernard A (2012) Topological model for machining of parts with complex shapes. Comput Ind 63:528–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Arezoo B, Ridgway K, Al-Ahmari AMA (2000) Selection of cutting tools and conditions of machining operations using an expert system. Comput Ind 42:43–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kumar R, Rajan A, Talukdar FA, Dey N, Santhi V, Balas VE (2017) Optimization of 5.5-GHz CMOS LNA parameters using firefly algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 28(12):3765–3779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jagatheesan K, Anand B, Samanta S, Dey N, Ashour AS, Balas VE (2017) Design of a proportional-integral-derivative controller for an automatic generation control of multi-area power thermal systems using firefly algorithm. IEEE/CAA J Automatica Sin 6(2):503–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Li J, Li T, Yu Y, Zhang Z, Pardalos PM, Zhang Y (2019) Discrete firefly algorithm with compound neighborhoods for asymmetric multi-depot vehicle routing problem in the maintenance of farm machinery. Appl Soft Comput J 81:105–119Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kumar A, Konar A, Bhattacharjee T, Das S (2018) Synergism of firefly algorithm and Q-learning for robot arm path planning. Swarm Evol Comput 43:50–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentSardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of TechnologySuratIndia

Personalised recommendations