Advertisement

Firefly Algorithm and Its Variants in Digital Image Processing: A Comprehensive Review

  • Nilanjan Dey
  • Jyotismita ChakiEmail author
  • Luminița Moraru
  • Simon Fong
  • Xin-She Yang
Chapter
Part of the Springer Tracts in Nature-Inspired Computing book series (STNIC)

Abstract

The significance and requirements of digital image processing arise from two main areas of applications: the improvement of visual information for human interpretation and the encoding of scene data for the independent perception of machines. However, human is often involved in such processing for manually tuning up the parameters, which takes a long time, and it remains as an unresolved issue. Nature is a brilliant and enormous source of inspiration for resolving difficult and complicated problems in computer science, as it possesses incredibly diverse, vibrant, flexible, complicated, and intriguing phenomena. In practice, selecting the optimum parameters for any technique is an optimization problem. Nature-inspired algorithms are metaheuristics that imitate the works of nature to solve optimization issues, leading to a new era in computing. There are several dozens of classical metaheuristic optimization algorithms reported in the literature, such as genetic algorithm, ant colony optimization, and particle swarm optimization. Though due to the efficacy and success in solving various digital image analysis problems, the firefly algorithm which is also a metaheuristic algorithm, inspired by fireflies’ flashing behaviour in nature, is used in various image analysis optimization studies. This work is dedicated to a comprehensive review of the firefly algorithm to solve optimization problems in various steps of digital image analysis, like image preprocessing, segmentation, compression, feature selection, and classification. Various applications of the firefly algorithm in image analysis are also discussed in this review. Key issues and future research directions will also be highlighted.

Keywords

Image processing Nature-inspired algorithms Metaheuristic algorithms Firefly algorithm Image analysis Optimization 

References

  1. 1.
    Pitas I (2000) Digital image processing algorithms and applications. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vandenbroucke N, Macaire L, Postaire JG (2000) Color image segmentation by supervised pixel classification in a color texture feature space. Application to soccer image segmentation. In: Proceedings 15th IEEE international conference on pattern recognition. ICPR-2000, vol 3, pp 621–624 (September)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vandenbroucke N, Macaire L, Postaire JG (2000) Color image segmentation by supervised pixel classification in a color texture feature space. Application to soccer image segmentation. In: Proceedings IEEE 15th international conference on pattern recognition. ICPR-2000, vol 3, pp 621–624 (September)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daly S (1994) A visual model for optimizing the design of image processing algorithms. In Proceedings of 1st IEEE international conference on image processing, vol 2, pp 16–20 (November)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ruiz JE, Paciornik S, Pinto LD, Ptak F, Pires MP, Souza PL (2018) Optimization of digital image processing to determine quantum dots’ height and density from atomic force microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 184:234–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grangetto M, Magli E, Martina M, Olmo G (2002) Optimization and implementation of the integer wavelet transform for image coding. IEEE Trans Image Process 11:596–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dalrymple B, Smith J (2018) Forensic digital image processing: optimization of impression evidence. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Diamond S, Sitzmann V, Boyd S, Wetzstein G, Heide F (2017) Dirty pixels: optimizing image classification architectures for raw sensor data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06487
  9. 9.
    Wang D, Li G, Jia W, Luo X (2011) Saliency-driven scaling optimization for image retargeting. Vis Comput 27:853–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shao P, Wu Z, Zhou X, Tran DC (2017) FIR digital filter design using improved particle swarm optimization based on refraction principle. Soft Comput 21:2631–2642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    George EB, Karnan M (2012) MR brain image segmentation using bacteria foraging optimization algorithm. Int J Eng Technol (IJET) 4:295–301Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Precht H, Gerke O, Rosendahl K, Tingberg A, Waaler D (2012) Digital radiography: optimization of image quality and dose using multi-frequency software. Pediatr Radiol 42:1112–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vahedi E, Zoroofi RA, Shiva M (2012) Toward a new wavelet-based watermarking approach for color images using bio-inspired optimization principles. Digit Signal Proc 22:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loukhaoukha K, Chouinard JY, Taieb MH (2011) Optimal image watermarking algorithm based on LWT-SVD via multi-objective ant colony optimization. J Inf Hiding Multimedia Sig Process 2:303–319Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tuba E, Alihodzic A, Tuba M (2017) Multilevel image thresholding using elephant herding optimization algorithm. In: 2017 IEEE 14th international conference on engineering of modern electric systems (EMES), pp 240–243 (June)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tuba E, Tuba M, Simian D, Jovanovic R (2017) JPEG quantization table optimization by guided fireworks algorithm. In: International workshop on combinatorial image analysis. Springer, Cham, pp 294–307 (June)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moallem P, Razmjooy N (2012) Optimal threshold computing in automatic image thresholding using adaptive particle swarm optimization. J Appl Res Technol 10:703–712Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ye Z, Wang M, Jin H, Liu W, Lai X (2015) An image thresholding approach based on ant colony optimization algorithm combined with genetic algorithm. Dimensions 15:16Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bhandari AK, Kumar D, Kumar A, Singh GK (2016) Optimal sub-band adaptive thresholding based edge preserved satellite image denoising using adaptive differential evolution algorithm. Neurocomputing 174:698–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bhandari AK, Kumar A, Chaudhary S, Singh GK (2016) A novel color image multilevel thresholding based segmentation using nature inspired optimization algorithms. Expert Syst Appl 63:112–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li H, He H, Wen Y (2015) Dynamic particle swarm optimization and K-means clustering algorithm for image segmentation. Optik 126:4817–4822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mahalakshmi S, Velmurugan T (2015) Detection of brain tumor by particle swarm optimization using image segmentation. Indian J Sci Technol 8:1Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li Z, Cao J, Zhao X, Liu W (2015) Atmospheric compensation in free space optical communication with simulated annealing algorithm. Opt Commun 338:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dhal KG, Ray S, Das A, Das S (2018) A survey on nature-inspired optimization algorithms and their application in image enhancement domain. Arch Comput Methods Eng 1–32Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Song KS, Kim MS, Kang MG (2016) Image enhancement algorithm using dynamic range optimization. J Inst Electron Inf Eng 53:101–109Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mahapatra PK, Ganguli S, Kumar A (2015) A hybrid particle swarm optimization and artificial immune system algorithm for image enhancement. Soft Comput 19:2101–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang C, Qin Q, Zhang T, Sun Y, Chen C (2017) Endmember extraction from hyperspectral image based on discrete firefly algorithm (EE-DFA). ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens 126:108–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang L, Zhou X, Wang Z, Tan C, Liu X (2017) A nonmodel dual-tree wavelet thresholding for image denoising through noise variance optimization based on improved chaotic drosophila algorithm. Int J Pattern Recogn Artif Intell 31:1754015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krishnaveni M, Subashini P, Dhivyaprabha TT (2016) A new optimization approach-SFO for denoising digital images. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on computation system and information technology for sustainable solutions (CSITSS), pp 34–39 (October)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kockanat S, Karaboga N (2017) Medical image denoising using metaheuristics. Metaheuristics for medicine and biology. Springer, Berlin, pp 155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ahmadi K, Javaid AY, Salari E (2015) An efficient compression scheme based on adaptive thresholding in wavelet domain using particle swarm optimization. Sig Process Image Commun 32:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Emara ME, Abdel-Kader RF, Yasein MS (2017) Image compression using advanced optimization algorithms. J Commun 12Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shrivastava P, Shukla A, Vepakomma P, Bhansali N, Verma K (2017) A survey of nature-inspired algorithms for feature selection to identify Parkinson’s disease. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 139:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pare S, Kumar A, Bajaj V, Singh GK (2017) An efficient method for multilevel color image thresholding using cuckoo search algorithm based on minimum cross entropy. Appl Soft Comput 61:570–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pare S, Bhandari AK, Kumar A, Singh GK (2017) An optimal color image multilevel thresholding technique using grey-level co-occurrence matrix. Expert Syst Appl 87:335–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gholami A, Bonakdari H, Ebtehaj I, Mohammadian M, Gharabaghi B, Khodashenas SR (2018) Uncertainty analysis of intelligent model of hybrid genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization with ANFIS to predict threshold bank profile shape based on digital laser approach sensing. Measurement 121:294–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hamid MS, Harvey NR, Marshall S (2003) Genetic algorithm optimization of multidimensional grayscale soft morphological filters with applications in film archive restoration. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 13:406–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dey N, Ashour A, Beagum S, Pistola D, Gospodinov M, Gospodinova E, Tavares J (2015) Parameter optimization for local polynomial approximation based intersection confidence interval filter using genetic algorithm: an application for brain MRI image de-noising. J Imaging 1:60–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang GG, Gandomi AH, Yang XS, Alavi AH (2016) A new hybrid method based on krill herd and cuckoo search for global optimisation tasks. Int J Bio-Inspired Comput 8:286–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wang Q, Zhou D, Nie R, Jin X, He K, Dou L (2016). Medical image fusion using pulse coupled neural network and multi-objective particle swarm optimization. In: Eighth international conference on digital image processing (ICDIP 2016), International society for optics and photonics, vol 10033, p 100334K (August)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wang Q, Zhou D, Nie R, Jin X, He K, Dou L (2016, August) Medical image fusion using pulse coupled neural network and multi-objective particle swarm optimization. In Eighth international conference on digital image processing (ICDIP 2016), International society for optics and photonics, vol 10033, p 100334KGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zheng Z, Saxena N, Mishra KK, Sangaiah AK (2018) Guided dynamic particle swarm optimization for optimizing digital image watermarking in industry applications. Future Gener Comput Syst 88:92–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kennedy J, Eberhart R, Shi Y (2001) Swarm intelligence. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ladgham A, Hamdaoui F, Sakly A, Mtibaa A (2015) Fast MR brain image segmentation based on modified Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm. SIViP 9:1113–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Amiri B, Fathian M, Maroosi A (2009) Application of shuffled frog-leaping algorithm on clustering. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wang N, Li X, Chen XH (2010) Fast three-dimensional Otsu thresholding with shuffled frog-leaping algorithm. Pattern Recogn Lett 31:1809–1815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Brajevic I, Tuba M (2014) Cuckoo search and firefly algorithm applied to multilevel image thresholding. Cuckoo search and firefly algorithm. Springer, Cham, pp 115–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Senthilnath J, Das V, Omkar SN, Mani V (2013) Clustering using levy flight cuckoo search. In: Proceedings of seventh international conference on bio-inspired computing: theories and applications (BIC-TA 2012). Springer, India, pp 65–75Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tiwari V (2012) Face recognition based on cuckoo search algorithm. Image 7:9Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Yang XS, Deb S (2009) Cuckoo search via Lévy flights. In: 2009 IEEE world congress on nature & biologically inspired computing (NaBIC), pp 210–214 (December)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Yang XS, Deb S (2010) Engineering optimisation by cuckoo search. arXiv preprint arXiv:1005.2908
  52. 52.
    Alihodzic A, Tuba M (2014) Improved bat algorithm applied to multilevel image thresholding. Sci World JGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Satapathy SC, Raja NSM, Rajinikanth V, Ashour AS, Dey N (2018) Multi-level image thresholding using Otsu and chaotic bat algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 29:1285–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cai X, Wang H, Cui Z, Cai J, Xue Y, Wang L (2018) Bat algorithm with triangle-flipping strategy for numerical optimization. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 9:199–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Yang XS (2010) Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms. Luniver PressGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Yang XS (2010) Firefly algorithm, Levy flights and global optimization. Research and development in intelligent systems XXVI. Springer, London, pp 209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yang XS (2010) Firefly algorithm, stochastic test functions and design optimisation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1003.1409
  58. 58.
    Yang XS (2010) A new metaheuristic bat-inspired algorithm. Nature inspired cooperative strategies for optimization (NICSO 2010). Springer, Berlin, pp 65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Yang XS (2012) Flower pollination algorithm for global optimization. International conference on unconventional computing and natural computation. Springer, Berlin, pp 240–249 (September)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Yang XS, Karamanoglu M, He X (2013) Multi-objective flower algorithm for optimization. Procedia Comput Sci 18:861–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tian J, Yu W, Xie S (2008) An ant colony optimization algorithm for image edge detection. In: 2008 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (IEEE world congress on computational intelligence), pp 751–756 (June)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Dorigo M (1992) Optimization, learning and natural algorithms. Ph.D. thesis, Politecnico di MilanoGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Cinsdikici MG, Aydın D (2009) Detection of blood vessels in ophthalmoscope images using MF/ant (matched filter/ant colony) algorithm. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 96:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Tao W, Jin H, Liu L (2007) Object segmentation using ant colony optimization algorithm and fuzzy entropy. Pattern Recogn Lett 28:788–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hanmandlu M, Verma OP, Kumar NK, Kulkarni M (2009) A novel optimal fuzzy system for color image enhancement using bacterial foraging. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 58:2867–2879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sanyal N, Chatterjee A, Munshi S (2011) An adaptive bacterial foraging algorithm for fuzzy entropy based image segmentation. Expert Syst Appl 38:15489–15498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Sathya PD, Kayalvizhi R (2011) Optimal multilevel thresholding using bacterial foraging algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 38:15549–15564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sathya PD, Kayalvizhi R (2011) Modified bacterial foraging algorithm based multilevel thresholding for image segmentation. Eng Appl Artif Intell 24:595–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Neshat M, Sepidnam G, Sargolzaei M, Toosi AN (2014) Artificial fish swarm algorithm: a survey of the state-of-the-art, hybridization, combinatorial and indicative applications. Artif Intell Rev 42:965–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    El-Said SA (2015) Image quantization using improved artificial fish swarm algorithm. Soft Comput 19:2667–2679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Chu X, Zhu Y, Shi J, Song J (2010) Method of image segmentation based on fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm and artificial fish swarm algorithm. In: 2010 IEEE international conference on intelligent computing and integrated systems, pp 254–257 (October)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Akay B (2013) A study on particle swarm optimization and artificial bee colony algorithms for multilevel thresholding. Appl Soft Comput 13:3066–3091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Horng MH (2011) Multilevel thresholding selection based on the artificial bee colony algorithm for image segmentation. Expert Syst Appl 38:13785–13791Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Zhang YD, Wu L, Wang S (2011) Magnetic resonance brain image classification by an improved artificial bee colony algorithm. Progress Electromagnet Res 116:65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Geng J, Li MW, Dong ZH, Liao YS (2015) Port throughput forecasting by MARS-RSVR with chaotic simulated annealing particle swarm optimization algorithm. Neurocomputing 147:239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Zhang Y, Yan H, Zou X, Tao F, Zhang L (2016) Image threshold processing based on simulated annealing and OTSU method. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Chinese intelligent systems conference. Springer, Berlin, pp 223–231Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Yang XS (2014) Nature-inspired optimization algorithms. Elsevier, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Bagheri M, Mirbagheri SA, Bagheri Z, Kamarkhani AM (2015) Modeling and optimization of activated sludge bulking for a real wastewater treatment plant using hybrid artificial neural networks-genetic algorithm approach. Process Saf Environ Prot 95:12–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Ghosh P, Mitchell M, Tanyi JA, Hung AY (2016) Incorporating priors for medical image segmentation using a genetic algorithm. Neurocomputing 195:181–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Yang XS (2008) Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms. Luniver Press, Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Ghamisi P, Benediktsson JA (2015) Feature selection based on hybridization of genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 12(2):309–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Esmin AA, Coelho RA, Matwin S (2015) A review on particle swarm optimization algorithm and its variants to clustering high-dimensional data. Artif Intell Rev 44:23–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Armano G, Farmani MR (2016) Multiobjective clustering analysis using particle swarm optimization. Expert Syst Appl 55:184–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Chen Y, Zhu Q, Xu H (2015) Finding rough set reducts with fish swarm algorithm. Knowl Based Syst 81:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Pérez-Delgado ML (2019) Color image quantization using the shuffled-frog leaping algorithm. Eng Appl Artif Intell 79:142–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Ma M, Zhu Q (2017) Multilevel thresholding image segmentation based on shuffled frog leaping algorithm. J Comput Theor Nanosci 14:3794–3801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Sharma TK, Pant M (2017) Opposition based learning ingrained shuffled frog-leaping algorithm. J Comput Sci 21:307–315MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Bermejo E, Cordón O, Damas S, Santamaría J (2015) A comparative study on the application of advanced bacterial foraging models to image registration. Inf Sci 295:160–181MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Hossain MA, Ferdous I (2015) Autonomous robot path planning in dynamic environment using a new optimization technique inspired by bacterial foraging technique. Rob Auton Syst 64:137–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Wan S, Chang SH, Chou TY, Shien CM (2018) A study of landslide image classification through data clustering using bacterial foraging optimizationGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Shi L, Guo R, Ma Y (2016) A novel artificial fish swarm algorithm for pattern recognition with convex optimization. In: 2016 international conference on communication and electronics systems (ICCES), pp 1–4 (October)Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Nalluri MSR, SaiSujana T, Reddy KH, Swaminathan V (2017) An efficient feature selection using artificial fish swarm optimization and svm classifier. In 2017 international conference on networks & advances in computational technologies (NetACT), pp. 407–411Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Bhandari AK, Kumar A, Singh GK (2015) Modified artificial bee colony based computationally efficient multilevel thresholding for satellite image segmentation using Kapur’s, Otsu and Tsallis functions. Expert Syst Appl 42:1573–1601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Bansal JC, Gopal A, Nagar AK (2018) Stability analysis of artificial bee colony optimization algorithm. Swarm Evol Comput 41:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Chen J, Yu W, Tian J, Chen L, Zhou Z (2018) Image contrast enhancement using an artificial bee colony algorithm. Swarm Evol Comput 38:287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Wang P, Lin JS, Wang M (2015) An image reconstruction algorithm for electrical capacitance tomography based on simulated annealing particle swarm optimization. J Appl Res Technol 13:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Ayumi V, Rere LR, Fanany MI, Arymurthy AM (2016) Optimization of convolutional neural network using microcanonical annealing algorithm. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on advanced computer science and information systems (ICACSIS), pp 506–511 (October)Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Dong Y, Wang J, Chen F, Hu Y, Deng Y (2017) Location of facility based on simulated annealing and “ZKW” algorithms. Math Probl EngGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Perez J, Melin P, Castillo O, Valdez F, Gonzalez C, Martinez G (2017) Trajectory optimization for an autonomous mobile robot using the Bat Algorithm. In: North American fuzzy information processing society annual conference, Springer, Cham, pp 232–241 (October)Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Sameen MI, Pradhan B, Shafri HZ, Mezaal MR, bin Hamid H (2017) Integration of ant colony optimization and object-based analysis for LiDAR data classification. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 10:2055–2066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Gao ML, Shen J, Yin LJ, Liu W, Zou GF, Li HT, Fu GX (2016) A novel visual tracking method using bat algorithm. Neurocomputing 177:612–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Gao ML, Li LL, Sun XM, Yin LJ, Li HT, Luo DS (2015) Firefly algorithm (FA) based particle filter method for visual tracking. Optik 126:1705–1711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Katiyar S, Patel R, Arora K (2016) Comparison and analysis of cuckoo search and firefly algorithm for image enhancement. International conference on smart trends for information technology and computer communications. Springer, Singapore, pp 62–68 (August)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Tabakhi S, Moradi P (2015) Relevance–redundancy feature selection based on ant colony optimization. Pattern Recogn 48:2798–2811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Dao TP, Huang SC, Thang PT (2017) Hybrid Taguchi-cuckoo search algorithm for optimization of a compliant focus positioning platform. Appl Soft Comput 57:526–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Ye Z, Yang J, Wang M, Zong X, Yan L, Liu W (2018) 2D Tsallis entropy for image segmentation based on modified chaotic bat algorithm. Entropy 20:239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Yang XS (2009) Firefly algorithms for multimodal optimization. International symposium on stochastic algorithms. Springer, Berlin, pp 169–178 (October)Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Wang H, Cui Z, Sun H, Rahnamayan S, Yang XS (2017) Randomly attracted firefly algorithm with neighborhood search and dynamic parameter adjustment mechanism. Soft Comput 21:5325–5339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Asl PF, Monjezi M, Hamidi JK, Armaghani DJ (2018) Optimization of flyrock and rock fragmentation in the Tajareh limestone mine using metaheuristics method of firefly algorithm. Eng Comput 34:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Dey N (2019) Uneven illumination correction of digital images: a survey of the state-of-the-art. Optik 183:483–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Dey N (ed) (2017) Advancements in applied metaheuristic computing. IGI Global, HersheyGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Dey N, Ashour AS (2018) Meta-heuristic algorithms in medical image segmentation: a review. In: Advancements in applied metaheuristic computing. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 185–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Mustafi A, Mahanti PK (2009) An optimal algorithm for contrast enhancement of dark images using genetic algorithms. In: Computer and information science 2009. Springer, Berlin, pp. 1–8Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Ashour AS, Samanta S, Dey N, Kausar N, Abdessalemkaraa WB, Hassanien AE (2015) Computed tomography image enhancement using cuckoo search: a log transform based approach. J Signal Inf Process 6:244Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Gorai A, Ghosh A (2009) Gray-level image enhancement by particle swarm optimization. In: 2009 IEEE world congress on nature & biologically inspired computing (NaBIC), pp 72–77 (December)Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Dhal KG, Quraishi IM, Das S (2015) A chaotic Lévy flight approach in bat and firefly algorithm for gray level image enhancement. IJ Image Graph Sig Process 7:69–76Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Samanta S, Mukherjee A, Ashour AS, Dey N, Tavares JMR, Abdessalem Karâa WB, Hassanien AE (2018) Log transform based optimal image enhancement using firefly algorithm for autonomous mini unmanned aerial vehicle: An application of aerial photography. Int J Image Graph 18:1850019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Draa A, Benayad Z, Djenna FZ (2015) An opposition-based firefly algorithm for medical image contrast enhancement. Int J Inf Commun Technol 7:385–405Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Hassanzadeh T, Vojodi H, Mahmoudi F (2011) December) Non-linear grayscale image enhancement based on firefly algorithm. International conference on swarm, evolutionary, and memetic computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 174–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Achim A, Bezerianos A, Tsakalides P (2001) Novel Bayesian multiscale method for speckle removal in medical ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:772–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Argenti F, Alparone L (2002) Speckle removal from SAR images in the undecimated wavelet domain. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 40:2363–2374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Xie H, Pierce LE, Ulaby FT (2002) SAR speckle reduction using wavelet denoising and Markov random field modeling. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 40:2196–2212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Chang SG, Yu B, Vetterli M (2000) Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression. IEEE Trans Image Process 9:1532–1546MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Nasri M, Nezamabadi-pour H (2009) Image denoising in the wavelet domain using a new adaptive thresholding function. Neurocomputing 72:1012–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Agrawal S, Panda R, Bhuyan S, Panigrahi BK (2013) Tsallis entropy based optimal multilevel thresholding using cuckoo search algorithm. Swarm Evol Comput 11:16–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Sezgin M, Sankur B (2004) Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation. J Electron Imaging 13:146–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Zahara E, Fan SKS, Tsai DM (2005) Optimal multi-thresholding using a hybrid optimization approach. Pattern Recogn Lett 26:1082–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Kittler J, Illingworth J (1986) Minimum error thresholding. Pattern Recogn 19:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Pun T (1981) Entropy thresholding: a new approach. Comput Vision Graph Image Proc 16:210–239Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9:62–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Kapur JN, Sahoo PK, Wong AK (1985) A new method for gray-level picture thresholding using the entropy of the histogram. Comput Vis Graph Image Process 29:273–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Song JH, Cong W, Li J (2017) A fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm for image segmentation using nonlinear weighted local information. J Inf Hiding Multimedia Sig Process 8:1–11Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Yin PY (1999) A fast scheme for optimal thresholding using genetic algorithms. Sig Process 72:85–95zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Lai CC, Tseng DC (2004) A hybrid approach using Gaussian smoothing and genetic algorithm for multilevel thresholding. Int J Hybrid Intell Syst 1:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Maitra M, Chatterjee A (2008) A hybrid cooperative–comprehensive learning based PSO algorithm for image segmentation using multilevel thresholding. Expert Syst Appl 34:1341–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Shi Y, Eberhart R (1998) A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: 1998 IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation proceedings. IEEE world congress on computational intelligence (Cat. No. 98TH8360), pp 69–73 (May)Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Gao H, Xu W, Sun J, Tang Y (2010) Multilevel thresholding for image segmentation through an improved quantum-behaved particle swarm algorithm. IEEE Trans Instrum Measur 59:934–946Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Ye Z, Zheng Z, Yu X, Ning X (2006) Automatic threshold selection based on ant colony optimization algorithm. In: International conference on neural networks and brain, Beijing, pp 728–732Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Samantaa S, Dey N, Das P, Acharjee S, Chaudhuri SS (2013) Multilevel threshold based gray scale image segmentation using cuckoo search. arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.0277
  141. 141.
    Rajinikanth V, Raja NSM, Satapathy SC (2016) Robust color image multi-thresholding using between-class variance and cuckoo search algorithm. Information systems design and intelligent applications. Springer, New Delhi, pp 379–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Horng MH, Jiang TW, Chen JY (2009) Multilevel minimum cross entropy threshold selection based on honey bee mating optimization. In: Proceedings of the international multi conference of engineers and computer scientists, Hong Kong, pp 978–988Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Resma KB, Nair MS (2018) Multilevel thresholding for image segmentation using Krill Herd Optimization algorithm. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf SciGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Khairuzzaman AKM, Chaudhury S (2017) Multilevel thresholding using grey wolf optimizer for image segmentation. Expert Syst Appl 86:64–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Łukasik S, Żak S (2009) Firefly algorithm for continuous constrained optimization tasks. International conference on computational collective intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 97–106 (October)Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Shah-Hosseini H (2011) Otsu’s criterion-based multilevel thresholding by a nature-inspired metaheuristic called galaxy-based search algorithm. In 2011 IEEE third world congress on nature and biologically inspired computing, pp 383–388 (October)Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Zhou C, Tian L, Zhao H, Zhao K (2015) A method of two-dimensional Otsu image threshold segmentation based on improved firefly algorithm. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on cyber technology in automation, control, and intelligent systems (CYBER), pp 1420–1424 (June)Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Raja N, Rajinikanth V, Latha K (2014) Otsu based optimal multilevel image thresholding using firefly algorithm. Model Simul Eng 2014:37Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Bhandari AK, Singh VK, Kumar A, Singh GK (2014) Cuckoo search algorithm and wind driven optimization based study of satellite image segmentation for multilevel thresholding using Kapur’s entropy. Expert Syst Appl 41:3538–3560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    He L, Huang S (2017) Modified firefly algorithm based multilevel thresholding for color image segmentation. Neurocomputing 240:152–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Horng MH (2010) Multilevel minimum cross entropy threshold selection based on the honey bee mating optimization. Expert Syst Appl 37:4580–4592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Kullback S (1968) Information theory and statistics. Dover, New yorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Li CH, Tam PKS (1998) An iterative algorithm for minimum cross entropy thresholding. Pattern Recognit Lett 19(8):771–776zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Tsallis C (1988) Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics. J Stat Phys 52:479–487MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Tsallis C, Rajagopal AK, Plastino AR, Andricioaei I, Stranb JE, Abe S, Klos J (2001) Nonextensive statistical mechanics and its applications. In: Abe S, Okamoto Y (eds) Series lecture notes in physics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Ramírez-Reyes A, Hernández-Montoya A, Herrera-Corral G, Domínguez-Jiménez I (2016) Determining the entropic index q of Tsallis entropy in images through redundancy. Entropy 18:299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Rajinikanth V, Raja NSM, Kamalanand K (2017) Firefly algorithm assisted segmentation of tumor from brain MRI using Tsallis function and Markov random field. J Control Eng Appl Inform 19:97–106Google Scholar
  158. 158.
    Manic KS, Priya RK, Rajinikanth V (2016) Image multithresholding based on Kapur/Tsallis entropy and firefly algorithm. Indian J Sci Technol 9:89949Google Scholar
  159. 159.
    Chiranjeevi K, Jena UR (2016) Image compression based on vector quantization using cuckoo search optimization technique. Ain Shams Eng JGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Linde Y, Buzo A, Gray R (1980) An algorithm for vector quantizer design. IEEE Trans Commun 28:84–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Horng MH (2012) Vector quantization using the firefly algorithm for image compression. Expert Syst Appl 39:1078–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Lloyd SP (1957) Least square quantization in PCM’s. Bell Telephone Laboratories Paper, Murray Hill, NJGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Severo V, Leitão HAS, Lima JB, Lopes WTA, Madeiro F (2016) Modified firefly algorithm applied to image vector quantisation codebook design. Int J Innov Comput Appl 7:202–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Gupta M, Tazi SN, Jain A (2014) Edge detection using Modified Firefly Algorithm. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and communication networks, pp 167–173 (November)Google Scholar
  165. 165.
    Nikolic M, Tuba E, Tuba M (2016) Edge detection in medical ultrasound images using adjusted Canny edge detection algorithm. In: 2016 IEEE 24th telecommunications forum (TELFOR), pp 1–4 (November)Google Scholar
  166. 166.
    Nikolic M, Tuba E, Tuba M (2016, November) Edge detection in medical ultrasound images using adjusted Canny edge detection algorithm. In: 2016 IEEE 24th telecommunications forum (TELFOR), pp 1–4Google Scholar
  167. 167.
    Chakraborty S, Dey N, Samanta S, Ashour AS, Balas VE (2016) Firefly algorithm for optimized nonrigid demons registration. In: Bio-inspired computation and applications in image processing. Academic Press, pp 221–237Google Scholar
  168. 168.
    Zhang Y, Wu L (2012) A novel method for rigid image registration based on firefly algorithm. Int J Res Rev Soft Intell Comput (IJRRSIC) 2:141–146Google Scholar
  169. 169.
    Lin TC, Yu PT (2004) Adaptive two-pass median filter based on support vector machines for image restoration. Neural Comput 16(2):333–354zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Kanimozhi T, Latha K (2015) An integrated approach to region based image retrieval using firefly algorithm and support vector machine. Neurocomputing 151:1099–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Darwish SM (2016) Combining firefly algorithm and Bayesian classifier: new direction for automatic multilabel image annotation. IET Image Process 10:763–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Siedlecki R, Sklansky J (1988) On automatic feature selection. Int J Pattern Recog Artificial Intell 2:197–220zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Tsai CF, Eberle W, Chu CY (2013) Genetic algorithms in feature and instance selection. Knowl Based Syst 39:240–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. 174.
    Chtioui Y, Bertrand D, Barba D (1998) Feature selection by a genetic algorithm. Application to seed discrimination by artificial vision. J Sci Food Agric 76:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. 175.
    Xue B, Zhang M, Browne WN (2014) Particle swarm optimisation for feature selection in classification: novel initialisation and updating mechanisms. Appl Soft Comput 18:261–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. 176.
    Xue B, Zhang M, Browne WN (2013) Particle swarm optimization for feature selection in classification: a multi-objective approach. IEEE Trans Cybern 43(6):1656–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. 177.
    Neagoe VE, Neghina EC (2016) Feature selection with ant colony optimization and its applications for pattern recognition in space imagery. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on communications (COMM), pp 101–104 (June)Google Scholar
  178. 178.
    Kanan HR, Faez K, Taheri SM (2007) Feature selection using ant colony optimization (ACO): a new method and comparative study in the application of face recognition system. In: Industrial conference ondata mining. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 63–76Google Scholar
  179. 179.
    Rodrigues D, Pereira LA, Almeida TNS, Papa JP, Souza AN, Ramos CC, Yang XS (2013) BCS: a binary cuckoo search algorithm for feature selection. In: 2013 IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems (ISCAS2013), pp 465–468 (May)Google Scholar
  180. 180.
    Reddi KK, Enireddy V (2016) Cuckoo search framework for feature selection and classifier optimization in compressed medical image retrieval. i-manager’s J Image Process 3:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. 181.
    Mistry K, Zhang L, Sexton G, Zeng Y, He M (2017) Facial expression recongition using firefly-based feature optimization. In: 2017 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), pp 1652–1658 (June)Google Scholar
  182. 182.
    Zhang L, Mistry K, Lim CP, Neoh SC (2018) Feature selection using firefly optimization for classification and regression models. Decis Support Syst 106:64–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. 183.
    Su H, Cai Y, Du Q (2016) Firefly-algorithm-inspired framework with band selection and extreme learning machine for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE J Sel Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 10(1):309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. 184.
    Su H, Tian S, Cai Y, Sheng Y, Chen C, Najafian M (2017) Optimized extreme learning machine for urban land cover classification using hyperspectral imagery. Front Earth Sci 11(4):765–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. 185.
    Aadit MNA, Mahin MT, Juthi SN (2017) Spontaneous micro-expression recognition using optimal firefly algorithm coupled with ISO-FLANN classification. In: 2017 IEEE region 10 humanitarian technology conference (R10-HTC), pp 714–717 (December)Google Scholar
  186. 186.
    Aadit MNA, Mahin MT, Juthi SN (2017, December) Spontaneous micro-expression recognition using optimal firefly algorithm coupled with ISO-FLANN classification. In: 2017 IEEE region 10 humanitarian technology conference (R10-HTC), pp 714–717Google Scholar
  187. 187.
    Shamshirband S, Petković D, Pavlović NT, Ch S, Altameem TA, Gani A (2015) Support vector machine firefly algorithm based optimization of lens system. Appl Opt 54:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. 188.
    Rahebi J, Hardalaç F (2016) A new approach to optic disc detection in human retinal images using the firefly algorithm. Med Biol Eng Comput 54:453–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. 189.
    Alomoush WK, Abdullah SNHS, Sahran S, Hussain RI (2014) Segmentation of MRI brain images using FCM improved by firefly algorithms. J Appl Sci 14:66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. 190.
    Alsmadi MK (2014) A hybrid firefly algorithm with fuzzy-C mean algorithm for MRI brain segmentation. Am J Appl Sci 11:1676–1691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. 191.
    Jothi G (2016) Hybrid tolerance rough set–firefly based supervised feature selection for MRI brain tumor image classification. Appl Soft Comput 46:639–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. 192.
    Roopini IT, Vasanthi M, Rajinikanth V, Rekha M, Sangeetha M (2018) Segmentation of tumor from brain MRI using fuzzy entropy and distance regularised level set. Computational signal processing and analysis. Springer, Singapore, pp 297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. 193.
    Senapati MR, Dash PK (2013) Local linear wavelet neural network based breast tumor classification using firefly algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 22:1591–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. 194.
    Filipczuk P, Wojtak W, Obuchowicz A (2012) Automatic nuclei detection on cytological images using the firefly optimization algorithm. Information technologies in biomedicine. Springer, Berlin, pp 85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. 195.
    Ch S, Sohani SK, Kumar D, Malik A, Chahar BR, Nema AK et al (2014) A support vector machine-firefly algorithm based forecasting model to determine malaria transmission. Neurocomputing 129:279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. 196.
    Kaur G, Singh R (2014) Sharpening enhancement of ultra sound images using firefly algorithm. Int J 4(8)Google Scholar
  197. 197.
    Boscolo R, Brown MS, McNitt-Gray MF (2002) Medical image segmentation with knowledge-guided robust active contours. Radiographics 22:437–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. 198.
    Xiaogang D, Jianwu D, Yangping W, Xinguo L, Sha L (2013) An algorithm multi-resolution medical image registration based on firefly algorithm and Powell. In: 2013 IEEE third international conference on intelligent system design and engineering applications, pp 274–277 (January)Google Scholar
  199. 199.
    Gao ML, He XH, Luo DS, Jiang J, Teng QZ (2013) Object tracking using firefly algorithm. IET Comput Vis 7:227–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. 200.
    Suresh S, Lal S (2016) An efficient cuckoo search algorithm based multilevel thresholding for segmentation of satellite images using different objective functions. Expert Syst Appl 58:184–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. 201.
    Borra S, Thanki R, Dey N (2019) Satellite image analysis: clustering and classification. Springer, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. 202.
    Wang GG, Guo L, Duan H, Wang H (2014) A new improved firefly algorithm for global numerical optimization. J Comput Theor Nanosci 11:477–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  203. 203.
    Chen K, Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Dai M, Chao Y, Shi J (2016) Multilevel image segmentation based on an improved firefly algorithm. Math Probl EngGoogle Scholar
  204. 204.
    Ibrahim IA, Khatib T (2017) A novel hybrid model for hourly global solar radiation prediction using random forests technique and firefly algorithm. Energy Convers Manage 138:413–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. 205.
    Agarwal C, Mishra A, Sharma A, Bedi P (2014) Optimized gray-scale image watermarking using DWT–SVD and firefly algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 41(17):7858–7867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. 206.
    Ali M, Ahn CW (2015) Comments on “Optimized gray-scale image watermarking using DWT-SVD and firefly algorithm”. Expert Syst Appl 42(5):2392–2394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. 207.
    Dong H, He M, Qiu M (2015) Optimized gray-scale image watermarking algorithm based on DWT-DCT-SVD and chaotic firefly algorithm. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on cyber-enabled distributed computing and knowledge discovery, pp 310–313 (September)Google Scholar
  208. 208.
    Guo Y, Li BZ, Goel N (2017) Optimised blind image watermarking method based on firefly algorithm in DWT-QR transform domain. IET Image Process 11:406–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. 209.
    Kazemivash B, Moghaddam ME (2017) A robust digital image watermarking technique using lifting wavelet transform and firefly algorithm. Multimedia Tools Appl 76:20499–20524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. 210.
    Chhikara RR, Singh L (2015) An improved discrete firefly and t-test based algorithm for blind image steganalysis. In: 2015 6th international conference on intelligent systems, modelling and simulation, pp 58–63Google Scholar
  211. 211.
    Chhikara RR, Sharma P, Singh L (2018) An improved dynamic discrete firefly algorithm for blind image steganalysis. Int J. Mach Learn Cyb 9(5):821–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. 212.
    Raja PM, Baburaj E (2016) Optimal parameter selection for quick response code based image steganography via variable step size firefly algorithm and lifting wavelet transform. J Comput Theor Nanosci 13(11):8742–8759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. 213.
    Woźniak M, Marszałek Z (2014) An idea to apply firefly algorithm in 2d image key-points search. In: International conference on information and software technologies, pp 312–323Google Scholar
  214. 214.
    Chaki J, Dey N, Shi F, Sherratt RS (2019) Pattern mining approaches used in sensor-based biometric recognition: a review. IEEE Sens J 19:3569–3580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. 215.
    Honarpisheh Z, Faez K (2013) An efficient dorsal hand vein recognition based on firefly algorithm. Int J Electr Comput Eng 3(1):2088–8708Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nilanjan Dey
    • 1
  • Jyotismita Chaki
    • 2
    Email author
  • Luminița Moraru
    • 3
  • Simon Fong
    • 4
  • Xin-She Yang
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Information TechnologyTechno India College of TechnologyKolkataIndia
  2. 2.School of Information Technology and EngineeringVellore Institute of TechnologyVelloreIndia
  3. 3.Department of Chemistry, Physics and Environment, Faculty of Sciences and EnvironmentDunarea de Jos University of GalatiGalatiRomania
  4. 4.Department of Computer and Information ScienceUniversity of MacauTaipaMacau
  5. 5.School of Science and TechnologyMiddlesex UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations