The Impending Demise of the WTO Appellate Body: From Centrepiece to Historical Relic?

  • Markus WagnerEmail author


The current crisis engulfing the multilateral trading system has crystalized in the dispute over the (re-)appointment of the members of the World Trade Organization’s Appellate Body. While the legislative arm of the organization has never lived up to its potential, its dispute settlement arm with the Appellate Body at its apex was seen as a lodestar for other international courts and tribunals. The United States has taken issue not only with individual decisions of the Appellate Body (as well as individual Appellate Body members), but with the institution as such. The article recounts the important institutional redesign that has led to the Appellate Body becoming the World Trade Organization’s institutional “centerpiece”. These very same developments are now destined to lead to the Appellate Body’s downfall with potential reverberations for the entire World Trade Organization’s dispute settlement process. Moreover, it threatens the institution as a whole, unless some last minute compromise can be found between various competing visions of global economic governance.


Appellate Body Dispute settlement International trade Trade Multilateralism 


  1. Australian Government, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (2019) Environmental Goods Agreement. Accessed 30 Jan 2019
  2. Araya M (2016) The relevance of the Environmental Goods Agreement in advancing the Paris Agreement goals and SDGs: a focus on clean energy and costa Rica’s experience, 8–10. Accessed 30 Jan 2019
  3. Arvis J et al (2013) Trade costs in the developing world: 1995–2010. World Trade Rev 15:451–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (2012) ANNEX C—APEC list of environmental goods. Accessed 30 Jan 2019
  5. Baschuk B (2016) U.S. blocks Korean judge from WTO Appellate Body. Accessed 14 Feb 2019
  6. Beall and Kuhn (2012) Trends in compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals since the Doha Declaration: a database analysis. Accessed 25 Mar 2019
  7. Bogdandy A, Wagner M (2006) Article III WTO Agreement—functions of the WTO. In: Stoll PT, Schorkopf F (eds) Max Planck commentaries on world trade law: WTO—institutions and dispute settlement. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  8. Charnovitz S (2017) How to save WTO dispute settlement from the Trump administration. Accessed 15 Feb 2019
  9. Cho S, Kurtz J (2014) Convergence and divergence in international economic law and politics. Eur J Int Law 29(1):169–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen H (2018) International order between governance and contract, 1. Accessed 21 Feb 2019
  11. Cosbey A (2014) The green goods agreement: neither green nor good?, 1. Accessed 30 Jan 2019
  12. Creamer CD, Godzimirska Z (2016) (De)Legitimation at the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. Vanderbilt J Transnatl Law 49:275–321Google Scholar
  13. Davey WJ (1987) Dispute settlement in GATT. Fordham Int Law J 11:51–109Google Scholar
  14. Ehlermann C (2002) Six years on the bench of the “World Trade Court”–some personal experiences as member of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization. J World Trade 36(4):605–639Google Scholar
  15. Ehlermann C (2005) Experiences from the WTO Appellate Body. Tex Int Law J 38(3):469–488Google Scholar
  16. Elsig M, Pollack MA (2014) Agents, trustees, and international courts: nomination and appointment of judicial candidates in the WTO Appellate Body. Eur J Int Relat 20:391–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fabry E, Tate E (2018) Saving the WTO Appellate Body or returning to the wild west of trade?, 15. Accessed 22 Feb 2019
  18. Freedman J (2018) Insight: will US “light another fire” over Servansing’s bid for second Appellate Body term? Accessed 21 Feb 2019
  19. Gathii JT (2002) The legal status of the Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Harv J Law Techol 15:291–317Google Scholar
  20. Graham TR (2014) Present at the creation. J Int Bus Law 12(2):317–325Google Scholar
  21. Hillman J (2018) Three approaches to fixing the World Trade Organization’s Appellate Body: the good, the bad and the Ugly?, 9–14. Accessed 15 Feb 2019
  22. Howse R (2016) The World Trade Organization 20 years on: global governance by judiciary. Eur J Int Law 27(1):9–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hudec RE (1993) Enforcing international trade law: the evolution of the modern GATT Legal System. Butterworth Legal Publishers, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Hudec RE et al (1993) A statistical profile of GATT dispute settlement cases: 1948–1989. Minn J Glob Trade 2(1):1–113Google Scholar
  25. Hufbauer GC (2011) WTO judicial appointments: bad omen for the trading system. Accessed 1 Feb 2019
  26. Institute of International Economic Law, Georgetown University Law Center (2018) Transition on the WTO Appellate Body: a pair of reforms? Accessed 15 Feb 2019
  27. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (2016) Ministerial talks to clinch Environmental Goods Agreement hit stumbling block.
  28. Jackson JH (1978) The jurisprudence of international trade: the DISC case in GATT. Am J Int Law 72(4):747–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson JH (1997) The world trading system: law and policy of international economic relations. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  30. Jackson JH (1998) World Trade Organization: constitution and jurisprudence. Royal Institute of International Affairs, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Jackson JH (2000) The jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO: insights on treaty law and economic relations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Kihara L (2019) Nearly half WTO members agree to talks on new e-commerce rules. Accessed 14 Feb 2019
  33. Kuijper PJ (2018) The US attack on the WTO Appellate Body. Leg Issues Econ Integ 45:1–11Google Scholar
  34. Lang A (2011) World trade law after neoliberalism reimagining the global economic order. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lester S (2018) Commentary: trump’s dangerous approach to the ‘supreme court’ of global trade. Accessed 5 Mar 2019
  36. Lighthizer (2017a) U.S. trade policy priorities: Robert Lighthizer, United States Trade Representative. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  37. Lighthizer (2017b) Opening plenary statement of USTR Robert Lighthizer at the WTO Ministerial Conference. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  38. Lund et al (2019) Globalization in transition: the future of trade and value chains. Accessed 14 Feb 2019
  39. McDougall (2017) The search for solutions to save the WTO Appellate Body, 2. Accessed 21 Feb 2019
  40. Mitchell T (2019) China to rush through new foreign investment law. Accessed 22 Mar 2019
  41. Mitchell, Dunkley (2019) US-China trade talks end with little sign of progress. Accessed 18 Feb 2019
  42. Neufeld N (2014) Trade facilitation provisions in regional trade agreements: traits and trends, 5. Accessed 30 Jan 2019
  43. Paine J (2018) The functions of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body: a distinctive voice mechanism. Accessed 22 Feb 2019
  44. Payosova T et al (2018) The dispute settlement crisis in the World Trade Organization: causes and cures, 8. Accessed 19 Feb 2019
  45. Petersmann E (1997) The GATT/WTO dispute settlement system–international law. International Organizations and Dispute Settlement. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  46. Pruzin D (2014a) WTO selection panel to recommence search for Appellate Body judge following deadlock. Int Trade Rep 31:150Google Scholar
  47. Pruzin D (2014b) WTO DSB chairman proposes process for filling contested appellate vacancy. Int Trade Rep 31:793Google Scholar
  48. Ramírez-Hernández R (2018) Farewell speech of Appellate Body member Ricardo Ramírez-Hernández. Accessed 3 Mar 2019
  49. Rappeport A, Landler M (2019) Trump optimistic on trade deal with China, but may keep tariffs anyway. Accessed 26 Mar 2019
  50. Reich A (1997) From diplomacy to law: the juridicization of international trade relations. Northwest J Int Law Bus 17:775–849Google Scholar
  51. Reuters (2016) WTO environmental trade talks fail. Accessed 30 Jan 2019
  52. Salles LE (2017) Bilateral agreements as an option to living through the WTO AB crisis. Accessed 19 Feb 2019
  53. Sell M (2017) Climate and trade policy in a new era: options ahead. Accessed 30 Jan 2019
  54. Shaffer G et al (2016) The Extensive (but fragile) authority of the WTO Appellate Body. Law Contemp Probl 79:237–273Google Scholar
  55. Steinberg RH (2004) Judicial lawmaking at the WTO: discursive, constitutional, and political constraints. Am J Int Law 98(2):247–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Steger DP (2004) Improvements and reform of the WTO Appellate Body. In: Ortino F, Petersmann E (eds) The WTO dispute settlement system, 1995–2003. Kluwer Law International, New York, pp 41–49Google Scholar
  57. Steger DP (2015) The founding of the Appellate Body. In: Marceau G (ed) A history of lawyers in the GATT/WTO: the development of the rule of law in the multilateral trading system. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 447–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stewart TP (2017) Disputed court: a look at the challenges to (and from) the WTO dispute settlement system, 7–8. Accessed 22 Feb 2019
  59. Stewart TP (2018) The broken multilateral trade dispute system, 30–31. Accessed 19 Feb 2019
  60. Trebilcock M et al (2013) The regulation of international trade. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. United States (2016) Statement by the United States at the meeting of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body. Accessed 14 Feb 2019
  62. United States (2018) Statements by the United States at the meeting of the WTO General Council. Accessed 14 Feb 2019
  63. Unterhalter D (2015) The authority of an institution: the Appellate Body under Review. In: Marceau G (ed) A history of lawyers in the GATT/WTO: the development of the rule of law in the multilateral trading System. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 466–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Van Damme I (2009) Treaty interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Van den Bossche P (2005) The making of the world trade court: the origins and development of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization. In: Yerxa R, Wilson B (eds) Key issues in WTO dispute settlement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 63–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Van den Bossche P (2006) From afterthought to centrepiece: the WTO Appellate Body and its rise to prominence in the world trading system. In: Sacerdoti G et al (eds) The WTO at Ten: the contribution of the dispute settlement system. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 289–301Google Scholar
  67. Van den Bossche P, Zdouc W (2017) The law and policy of the World Trade Organization: text, cases, and materials. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wagner M (2011) Law talk v. science talk: the languages of law and science in WTO proceedings. Fordham Int Law J 35(1):151–200Google Scholar
  69. Wagner M (2017) The future of sanitary and phytosanitary governance: SPS-Plus or SPS-Minus? J World Trade 51(3):445–469Google Scholar
  70. Weiler JHH (2001) The rule of lawyers and the ethos of diplomats—reflections on the internal and external legitimacy of WTO dispute settlement. J World Trade 35(2):191–207Google Scholar
  71. Wolf M (2019) The challenge of one world, two systems.–23b1-11e9-b329-c7e6ceb5ffdf. Accessed 26 Mar 2019
  72. Wooders P (2009) Greenhouse gas emission impacts of liberalizing trade in environmental goods, 19. Accessed 30 Jan 2019
  73. World Trade Organization (2014) Environmental Goods Agreement (EGA). Accessed 26 Mar 2019
  74. World Trade Organization (2015) World trade report 2015, 83. Accessed 26 Mar 2019
  75. World Trade Organization (2016) WTO members debate appointment/reappointment of Appellate Body members. Accessed 14 Feb 2019
  76. World Trade Organization (2017a) WTO’s trade facilitation agreement enters into force. Accessed 8 Aug 2017
  77. World Trade Organization (2017b) Annual Report 2017, 72. Accessed 8 Aug 2017
  78. World Trade Organization (2017c) From vision to reality: event celebrates success of the trade facilitation agreement. Accessed 8 Aug 2017
  79. World Trade Organization (2017d) Concerns grow about slippage in subsidy notifications. Accessed 22 Feb 2019
  80. World Trade Organization (2018a) The Doha round. Accessed 25 Jan 2019
  81. World Trade Organization (2018b) “Unprecedented challenges” confront Appellate Body, chair warns. Accessed 5 Mar 2019
  82. World Trade Organization (2019) Services negotiations. Accessed 14 Feb 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations