Advertisement

Technologies “Disrupting” Gender Relations?

  • Reihana MohideenEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

“Disruptive technologies” have the potential to disrupt the status quo. Some feminists also reflect optimism about how these technologies provide a tool for challenging traditional notions of gender identity, transforming the relationship between women and technology.

Renewable energy technologies and systems have the potential to transform how energy is produced, distributed and consumed. Smart and agile power systems based on distributed energy sources, such as mini-grids, can result in solutions for inclusive energy access. Disruptive technologies can enable developing countries to “leapfrog” stages of development, by using less capital-intensive centralized technology.

However, technological change that has the possibility of enhancing equity and inclusion can also enhance pre-existing hierarchies and inequalities if controlled by those with vested interests, who deploy it to further entrench their position.

Keywords

Disruptive technologies Gender relations Renewable energy Mini-grids Solar PV Wind India Surveillance Decentralization Patriarchal 

Bibliography

  1. Eldred, Michael. 2014. Are We Enslaved by Technology? IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Winter, Vol. 33, No. 4.Google Scholar
  2. Evans, Robert John. 2014. Discussion Notes on ‘Disruptive Technologies’.Google Scholar
  3. Karp, Jann. 2014. GPS in Interstate Trucking in Australia: Intelligence, Surveillance—or Compliance Tool? IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Summer, Vol. 33, No. 2.Google Scholar
  4. Manyika, J., et al. 2013. Disruptive Technologies: Advances That Will Transform Life, Business, and the Global Economy. McKinsey Global Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/disruptive-technologies.
  5. Michaels, Katina. 2014. Enslave. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Winter, Vol. 33, No. 4.Google Scholar
  6. Neussner, Olaf. 2014. Assessment of Early Warning Efforts in Leyte for Typhoon Haiyan/Yolanda. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). Manila, Philippines, May 2014, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
  7. Rundle, Guy. 2014. A Revolution in the Making: 3D Printing, Robots and the Future. Melbourne: Affirm Press.Google Scholar
  8. Stanley, J. 2014. Personal Rights in the Age of Omnipresent Cameras. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Summer, Vol. 33, No. 2.Google Scholar
  9. Stewardson, M.J., D. Skinner, M. Ayre, S. Barlow, B. Cook, B. Farquharson, S. Fuentes, L. Godden, D. Karoly, J. Langford, V. Nemes, R. Nettle, M. Peel, V. Pettigrove, I. Rutherfurd, D. Ryu, K. Saleem, P. Scales, M.K. Soltanieh, A. Webb, A. Western, and E. Weyer. 2014. Water Productivity Blueprint. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  10. UNDP. 2004. Gender & Energy for Sustainable Development: A Toolkit and Resource Guide. New York: United Nations Development Program.Google Scholar
  11. York, Richard. 2012. Do Alternative Energy Sources Displace Fossil Fuels? Nature Climate Change 2: 441–443. www.nature.com/natureclimatechange.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electrical and Electronic EngineeringUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations