Advertisement

Reviewing Surface Defects for the Performance Degradation in the Solar Devices

  • Kruti Pancholi
  • Mosam Pandya
  • Dhyey RavalEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 608)

Abstract

A silicon based photovoltaic (PV) cells are underlying a surface analysis for understanding its performance degradation. Approach for the split investigation based on the surface images with electrical parameter was used for analyzing the performance factors. Solar devices which are having a power hotspot for proficient electrical vitality are over time span. The defect in the cell due to the surface deformity leads to decreased in the performance parameter and affects the overall maximum power capability. The continuation to diminish wafer thickness in the fabrication process of silicon cells causes increase in the defects patterns as seen in the numerous cases studies. Reviewing the model-based system dependent on image processing algorithm especially designed for the degradation analysis capable to recognize any miniature crack before its large penetration to avoid major damage in the system. Study is based on the board surface and with the measurable symptoms in the initial phase of the degradation process. Analysis of PV cells with ARIMA model with voltage, current and power butt-centric analysis has been investigated to understand the process of its degradation. Recognition of the break and split division technique with edge detection was used in the model for its observation. Channel for split finding and recognizing its pattern is used in the modern application as seen in the recent field of the photovoltaic.

Keywords

Solar cells Imaging Degradation and silicon 

References

  1. 1.
    Stromer D, Vetter A, Oezkan HC, Probst C, Maier A (2019) Enhanced crack segmentation (eCS): a reference algorithm for segmenting cracks in multicrystalline silicon solar cells, pp 2156–3381Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Energy Statistics Pocket Book (2019) United Nations Publications, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gielena D, Boshella F, Sayginb D, Bazilianc MD, Wagnera N, Gorinia R (2019) The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation, pp 2211–467XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feng B, Shen X, Long J, Chen H (2013) A novel crack detection algorithm for solar panel surface images, pp 650–654. 978-0-7695-5125-8/13Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pletzer TM,van Molken JI, RiBland S, Hallam B, Comagliotti E, John J, Breitenstein O, Knoch J (2014) Quantitative local current-voltage analysis with different spatially resolved camera based techniques of silicon solar cells with cracks, pp 3473–3478. 978-1-4799-4398-2/14Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Al Ahmar J, Wiese S (2014) A crack analysis model for silicon based solar cells. In: 15th international conference on thermal, mechanical and multi-physics simulation and experiments in microelectronics and microsystems. 978-1-4799-4790-4/14Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jean J-H, Chen C-H, Lin H-L (2011) Application of an image processing software tool to crack inspection of crystalline silicon solar cells. In: Proceedings of the international conference on machine learning and cybernetics. GuilinGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al Ahmar J, Wiesel S (2013) Analysis and simulation of cracks and micro cracks in PV Cells. In: 14th international conference on thermal, mechanical and multi-physics simulation and experiments in microelectronics and microsystemsGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aghamohammadi AH, Prabuwono AS, Sahran S, Mogharrebi M (2011) Solar cell panel crack detection using particle swarm optimization algorithm. In: International conference on pattern analysis and intelligent robotics. Putrajaya, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karimi AM, Fada JS, Liu JQ, Braid JL, Koyuturk M, French RH (2018) Feature extraction, supervised and unsupervised machine learning classification of PV cell electroluminescence images. 978-1-5386-8529-7/18Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fu W, Breininger K, Würfl T, Ravikumar N, Schaffert R, Maier A (2017) Frangi-net, a neural network approach to vessel segmentationGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gong D, Medioni G (2012) Probabilistic tensor voting for robust perceptual grouping. Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Systems. https://doi.org/10.1.1.310.2157
  13. 13.
    Urade HS, Patel R (2011) Study and analysis of particle swarm optimization: a review. In: 2nd national conference on information and communication technology (NCICT)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chauhan A, Singh A (2017) An ARIMA model for the forecasting of healthcare waste generation in the Garhwal region of Uttarakhand, India. Int J Serv Oper Inf. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOI.2017.086587CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swarrnim Institute of Technology, Swarnim Startup & Innovation UniversityGandhinagarIndia
  2. 2.L. J. Institute of Engineering and TechnologyAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations