Comprehensive Survey of IoT Communication Technologies

  • T. Ramathulasi
  • M. Rajasekhara BabuEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1054)


The development of brilliant things associated with the Web is relatively in-wrinkling on the world. The IoT-network is empowering the association between the articles or devices and the backend frameworks by means of the Internet to impart. Existed correspondence advances gathers in-field information and after that transmit it to the data center where analytics are examined are connected to it, however, this is no longer survive capable by the development of IoT in which interchanges are more than the communication of human-to-human (H2H) and machine-to-machine (M2M). Effective correspondence innovation is regularly testing because of ultra-low power utilization, handling and capacity abilities, which have significant sway on the feasible throughput and parcel gathering proportion just as idleness. Therefore, every one of these variables makes it is hard to choose a suitable innovation to streamline correspondence execution, which dominatingly relies upon the given application. New methodologies and new advancements are required to change huge measures of gathered information into significant data and furthermore can meet the necessities for gigantic IoT in the 5G period. This paper provides a picture of the main wired medium, wireless communication technologies, and cellular communication technologies for massive IoT in the 5G era (eMTC and NB-IoT) with its features and technical characteristics that means to enable the user to pick a reasonable and satisfactory IoT correspondence innovation for claim requests in the colossal number of assortment. This review gives an exhaustive perspective on the correspondence technologies for IoT availability.


Communication technologies (CT’s) LPWA standards Cellular standards eMTC NB-IoT 


  1. 1.
    Affairs, M.: Internet of Things in the Netherlands Applications Trends and Potential Impact on Radio Spectrum (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ropert, S., Leader, I.p.: IoT: a Market Keeping Its Promise of 10% Annual Growth Thanks to Fast-Growing Industrial Markets, (Online). Available:
  3. 3.
    Munjal, Communication (Wired) Protocols in IOT (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bensky, A.: Short-Range Wireless Communication: Fundamentals of RF System Design and Application (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Salman, T.: Internet of Things Protocols and Standards (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hossen, M., Kabir, A., Khan, R.H., Azfar, A.: Interconnection between 802.15. 4 devices and IPv6: implications and existing approaches (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lu, C.-W., Li, S.-C., Wu, Q.: Interconnecting ZigBee and 6LoWPAN wireless sensor networks for smart grid applications (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Samie, F., Bauer, L., Henkel, J.: IoT technologies for embedded computing: a survey (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Infrared Communication (IrDA), (Online). Available:
  10. 10.
    Porkodi, R., Bhuvaneswari, V.: The Internet of Things (IoT) applications and communication enabling technology standards: an overview (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rahman, A.B.A., Jain, R.: Comparison of Internet of Things (IoT) Data Link Protocols (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang, L., Giannakis, G.B.: Ultra-Wideband Communications: An Idea Whose Time Has Come, vol. 21, pp. 26–54 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hirt, W.: Ultra-wideband radio technology: overview and future research. Comput. Commun. 26(1), 46–52 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Su, Y., Shen, C., Lee, J.: A comparative study of wireless protocols: bluetooth, UWB, ZigBee, and Wi-Fi. In: IECON 2007—33rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Taipei, 2007, pp. 46–51. doi: 2007.4460126 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Subhas, M., Noushin Poursafar, N., Alahi, M.E.E.: Long-range Wireless Technologies for IoT Applications: A Review (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    NOKIA., LTE evolution for IoT connectivity (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lescuyer, P., Lucidarme, T.: Evolved Packet System (EPS): The LTE and SAE Evolution of 3G UMTS. Wiley, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang, Y.-P.E., Lin, X., Adhikary, A., Grovlen, A., Sui, Y., Blankenship, Y.: A primer on 3g pp narrowband internet of things. IEEE Commun. Mag. 55, 117–123 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and EngineeringVellore Institute of TechnologyVelloreIndia

Personalised recommendations