Advertisement

Toxicity of Soil Hydrocarbon Pollution in Field Crops and Its Remediation

  • Maimona Saeed
  • Noshin Ilyas
Chapter
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

Soil hydrocarbon contamination is an emerging constraint across the globe. The presence of hydrocarbon alters the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil and makes it unfit for plant growth. The intensity of effects varies according to types of contaminants, the extent of contaminants, type of soil, and its properties. Mainly, hydrocarbon in soil decreases the germination of seed, growth, and yield of wheat. As different physical and chemical methods are used to treat polluted soil, such methods are not environmentally friendly and have certain disadvantages. Bioremediation is one of the environmental friendly and cost-effective techniques used for treating the contaminated site. Microorganisms, plants, or both plants and microbes can be used for remediation. The effectiveness of technique depends on the amount and type of contaminants. Microbial degradation is not effective for a large area. Similarly, phytoremediation also has certain limitations. But the combination of both methods has shown a better result. So, there is a need to utilize such a method for remediation purpose and make soil favorable for the growth of crops.

Keywords

Bioremediation Wheat Phytoremediation 

References

  1. Abii TA, Nwosu PC (2009) The effect of oil-spillage on the soil of Eleme in Rivers State of the Niger Delta area of Nigeria. Res J Environ Sci 3:316–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam G, Duncan H (2002) Influence of diesel on seed germination. Environ Pollut 120:363–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adedokun OM, Ataga AE (2007) Effects of amendments and bioaugmentation of soil polluted with crude oil, automotive gasoline oil and spent engine oil on the growth of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Sci Res Essays 2:147–149Google Scholar
  4. Akpoveta OV, Egharevba F, Medjor OW, Osaro KI, Enyemike ED (2011) Microbial degradation and its kinetics on crude oil polluted soil. Res J Chem Sci 1:8–14Google Scholar
  5. Certini G (2005) Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review. Oecologia 143:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaillan F, Flesche A, Bury E, Phantavong Y-H, Grimont P, Saliot A, Oudot J (2004) Identification and biodegradation potential of tropical aerobic hydrocarbon degrading microorganisms. Res Microbiol 155:587–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaineau CH, Rougeux G, Yepremian C, Oudot J (2003) Effects of nutrient concentration on the biodegradation of crude oil and associated microbial populations in the soil. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1490–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ekpo FE, Nya EJ (2012) Effect of poultry manure amendments on diesel oil polluted soil on germination and growth performance of some forest tree species. J Res Environ Sci Toxicol 1(7):195–200Google Scholar
  9. FGS (Frontier GeoSciences, Inc.) (2009) Measure trace metals in hydrocarbons. Available online at http://www.frontiergs.com/files/Measure_TMs_in_Hydrocarbons.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2012
  10. FRTR (2005) Federal remediation technologies roundtable: remediation technologies screening matrix and reference guide, Version 4.0. http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/top_page.html. Accessed 18 May 2012
  11. Ghosh M, Singh SP (2005) A review on phytoremediation of heavy metals and utilization of its byproducts. Appl Ecol Environ Res 3:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hofman J, Svihalek J, Holoubek I (2004) Evaluation of functional diversity of soil microbial communities – a case study. Plant Soil Environ 50:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications) (2006) Biotech plants for bioremediation pocket K No. 24. Available online at http://www.isaaa.org.kc. Accessed 9 Aug 2012
  14. Kirk JL, Moutoglis P, Klironomos J, Lee H, Trevors JT (2005) Toxicity of diesel fuel to germination, growth and colonization of Glomus intraradices in soil and in vitro transformed carrot root cultures. Plant Soil 270:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar A, Bisht BS, Joshi VD, Dhewa T (2010) Review on bioremediation of polluted environment: a management tool. Int J Environ Sci 1:1079–1093Google Scholar
  16. Kyung-Hwa B, Hee-Sik K, Hee-Mock O, Byung-Dae Y, Jaisoo K, In-Sook L (2004) Effects of crude oil, oil components and bioremediation on plant growth. J Environ Sci Health 39:2465–2472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marinescu M, Toti M, Tanase V, Plopeanu G, Calciu I, Marinescu M (2011) The effects of crude oil pollution on physical and chemical characteristics of soil. Res J Agric Sci 43:125–129Google Scholar
  18. McCutcheon SC, Schnoor JL (2003) Phytoremediation: transformation and control of contaminants. Wiley-Interscience Inc, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McGill WB, Rowell MJ, Westlake DWS (1981) Biochemistry, ecology, and microbiology of petroleum components in soil In: Paul EA, Ladd JN (eds) Soil Biochem 3:229–296. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Merkl N, Schultze-Kraft R, Infante C (2005) Assessment of tropical grasses and legumes for phytoremediation of petroleum contaminated soils. Water Air Soil Pollut 165:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Naidu R, Megharaj M, Malik S, Rachakonda PK, Chadalawada S, Perso F, Watkin N, Chen Z, Bowman M (2010) Monitored natural attenuation (MNA) as a cost effective sustainable remediation technology for petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated sites: demonstration of scientific evidence. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil solution for a changing world, pp 38–39Google Scholar
  22. Nicolotti G, Egli S (1998) Soil contamination by crude oil: impact on the mycorrhizosphere and on the vegetation potential of forest trees. Environ Pollut 99:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Njoku KL, Akinola MO, Oboh BO (2008) Growth and performance of Glycine max L. (Merrill) grown in crude oil contaminated soil augmented with cow dung. Nat Sci 6:48–56Google Scholar
  24. Nwadinigwe AO, Onyeidu EG (2012) Bioremediation of crude oil polluted soil using bacteria and poultry manure monitored through soybean productivity. Pol J Environ Stud 21:171–176Google Scholar
  25. Nwaoguikpe RN (2011) The effect of crude oil spill on the ascorbic acid content of some selected vegetable species: Spinacea oleraceae, Solanum melongena and Talinum triangulare in an oil polluted soil. Pak J Nutr 10:274–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Obire O, Nwaubeta O (2002) Effects of refined petroleum hydrocarbon on soil physicochemical and bacteriological characteristics. J Appl Sci Environ Manag 6:39–44Google Scholar
  27. Ogbo EM, Avwerosovwe U, Odogu G (2009) Screening of four common Nigerian weeds for use in phytoremediation of soils contaminated with spent lubricating oil. African J Plant Sci 3:102–106Google Scholar
  28. Pal S, Patra AK, Reza SK, Wildi W, Pote J (2010) Use of bio-resources for remediation of soil pollution. Nat Resour 1:110–125Google Scholar
  29. Palmroth M (2006) Enhancement of in situ remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soil. Tampere University of Technology, TampereGoogle Scholar
  30. Rahbar FG, Kiarostami K, Shirdam R (2012) Effects of petroleum hydrocarbons on growth, photosynthetic pigments and carbohydrate levels of sunflower. J Food Agric Environ 10:773–776Google Scholar
  31. Robertson SJ, McGill WB, Massicotte HB, Rutherford PM (2007) Petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in boreal forest soils: a mycorrhizal ecosystems perspective. Biol Rev 82:213–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robles-Gonzalez I, Fava F, Poggi-Varaldo HM (2008) A review of slurry bioreactors for bioremediation of soils and sediments. Microb Cell Factories 7:5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sarkar D, Ferguson M, Datta R, Birnbaum S (2005) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated soils: comparison of bio solids addition, carbon supplementation and monitored natural attenuation. Environ Pollut 136:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seghers D, Bulcke R, Reheul D, Siciliano SD, Top EM, Verstraete W (2003) Pollution induced community tolerance (PICT) and analysis of 16S rRNA genes to evaluate the long-term effects of herbicides on methanotrophic communities in soil. Eur J Soil Sci 54:679–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Semple KT, Morriss AWJ, Paton GI (2003) Bioavailability of hydrophobic organic contaminants in soils: fundamental concepts and techniques for analysis. Eur J Soil Sci 54:809–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Suleimanov RR, Gabbasova IM, Sitdikov RN (2005) Changes in the properties of oily gray forest soil during biological reclamation. Biol Bull 32:109–115Google Scholar
  37. Taylor BM (2007) Bioremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soil. ECSOL Limited 9:1–18Google Scholar
  38. Trofimov SY, Rozanova MS (2003) Transformation of soil properties under the impact of oil pollution. Eurasian Soil Sci 36:S82–S87Google Scholar
  39. Urgun-Demirtas M, Stark B, Pagilla K (2006) Use of genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) for the bioremediation of contaminants. Crit Rev Biotechnol 26:145–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (1994) How to evaluate alternative clean-up technologies for underground storage tank site. EPA 510-B-94003Google Scholar
  41. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2005) EPA REACH IT Database: remediation and characterization innovation technologies. http://www.clu-in.org/products/nairt/default.cfm. Accessed 18 May 2012
  42. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2012) A citizen’s guide to phytoremediation. EPA 542-F-12-016Google Scholar
  43. Zhu Y, Song Z, Chen J, Cui Li, Xiao B, Wang Q (2012) Effects of oil-contaminated soil on the seed germination and seedling growth of selected crops. World automation congress IEEEGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maimona Saeed
    • 1
  • Noshin Ilyas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyPMAS Arid Agriculture University RawalpindiRawalpindiPakistan

Personalised recommendations