Advertisement

Primary School Students’ Science Inquiry Learning and Behavior Patterns While Exploring Augmented Reality Science Learning

  • Xiao-Fan LinEmail author
  • Qianyi Wu
  • Weipeng Shen
  • Qianyi Zhu
  • Jiahui Wang
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1048)

Abstract

Scientific inquiry has been recognized as an effective instructions ability for learners in science education. The present study aims to explore the behavioral patterns of the science inquiry learning process and the behavior patterns of conception construction in augmented reality (AR) science learning activities for primary school students. An AR-based inquiry learning activity of “Exploring the External Conditions of Seed Germination” was supported, which is an attempt to integrate virtual objects with real situations. Learners utilize the AR based learning materials to accumulate experiences and identify problems while observing and perceiving science concepts. They carry out scientific inquiry based on problems. The scientific inquiry learning can be implemented the following eight-step teaching strategies: constructing environment with AR, revealing misconception under experience, correcting mistakes through AR concepts, obtaining new knowledge by reflection and exploration, establishing the experimental scheme with AR, bringing the scheme to completion by modifying, solving scientific questions through AR, making progress under self-reflection. Students’ learning behaviors were analyzed by adopting behavioral sequence analysis. The results suggest that the eight-step teaching strategies may support learners’ inquiry learning processes to achieve a positive outcome for their self-efficacy in science inquiry learning.

Keywords

Augmented reality Sequential analysis Science education Scientific inquiry Behavioral pattern Self-efficacy 

References

  1. 1.
    Linder, C., Rienow, A., Jürgens, C.: Augmented reality applications as digital experiments for education - an example in the Earth-Moon System. Acta Astronaut. 161, 66–74 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.05.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sirakaya, M., Cakmak, E.K.: The Effect of augmented reality use on achievement, misconception and course engagement. Contemp. Educ. Technol. 9(3), 297–314 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.444119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Simmons, M.E., Wu, X.B., Knight, S.L., Lopez, R.R.: Assessing the influence of field- and gis-based inquiry on student attitude and conceptual knowledge in an undergraduate ecology lab. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 7(3), 338–345 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-07-0050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Behmke, D., et al.: Augmented reality chemistry: transforming 2-D molecular representations into interactive 3-D structures. In: Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary STEM Teaching and Learning Conference, vol. 2, pp. 5–11 (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duan, Y., Ni, C., Wu, T.G., Fang, K., Zhang, R.: Design and implementation of physics experiment self-learning environment with virtual and real fusion. China Educ. Informatization 3, 37–41 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8454.2018.02.009. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chiang, T.H.C., Yang, S.J.H., Hwang, G.J.: Students’ online interactive patterns in augmented reality-based inquiry activities. Comput. Educ. 78, 97–108 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wu, P.H., Hwang, G.J., Yang, M.L., Chen, C.H.: Impacts of integrating the repertory grid into an augmented reality-based learning design on students’ learning achievements, cognitive load and degree of satisfaction. Interact. Learn. Environ. 26(2), 1–14 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1294608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cai, S., Wang, X., Chiang, F.K.: A case study of augmented reality simulation system application in a chemistry course. Comput. Hum. Behav. 37, 31–40 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng, K.H., Tsai, C.C.: Children and parents’ reading of an augmented reality picture book: analyses of behavioral patterns and cognitive attainment. Comput. Educ. 72(C), 302–312 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin, X.F., Zhu, Q.Y., Wu, Q.Y., Shen, W.P., Wang, J.H.: Research on experiential teaching resources in science education supported by AR: Strategy and Case. China Educ. Informatization (in press). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patent Search and Analysis, 24 August 2016. http://www.pss-system.gov.cn/sipopublicsearch/portal/uiIndex.shtml. Accessed 31 May 2019. (in Chinese)
  12. 12.
    Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., Reeve, R.: Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 55, 117–145 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9019-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chang, S.C., Hwang, G.J.: Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions. Comput. Educ. 125, 226–239 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin, T.J., Duh, H.B.L., Li, N., Wang, H.Y., Tsai, C.C.: An investigation of learners’ collaborative knowledge construction performances and behavior patterns in an augmented reality simulation system. Comput. Educ. 68, 314–321 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Guangdong Provincial Engineering and Technologies Research Centre for Smart LearningSouth China Normal UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.School of Information Technology in EducationSouth China Normal UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations