Advertisement

Online Gamified Learning Platforms (OGLPs) for Experiential Learning

  • Kenneth Ng
  • Ivan Ka-Wai LaiEmail author
  • Kwan-Keung Ng
  • Qi-Xuan Lyu
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1048)

Abstract

Traditional classroom learning approaches make students feel boring and lack of learning motivations in the learning process, especially for some practical courses like tourism and hospitality. Online Gamified Learning Platforms (OGLPs) are useful, but these OGLPs are not as popular as learning tools for students. Therefore, this research aims to identify the factors that influence students’ usage intention toward using OGLPs for their learning in tourism and hospitality courses. The research extends the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with other factors - ‘perceived playfulness’, ‘knowledge improvement’, ‘engagement’, and ‘immersion’. The survey results indicate that knowledge improvement, engagement, and immersion influence perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived playfulness; and perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived playfulness influence learners’ usage intention toward using OGLPs. This study provides a model for studying the gamified learning and recommendations for OGLPs developers to enhance the design of OGLPs.

Keywords

TAM Perceived playfulness Gamification Online gamified platform Knowledge improvement Engagement Immersion 

References

  1. 1.
    Ahn, T., Ryu, S., Han, I.: The impact of Web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing. Inform. Manag. 44(3), 263–275 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davis, F.D.: A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1985)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., Nacke, L.: From game design elements to gamefulness. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference on Envisioning Future Media Environments – MindTrek, vol. 11. pp. 9–15. ACM, Tampere (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., Angelova, G.: Gamification in education: a systematic mapping study. Educ. Tech. Soc. 18(3), 75–88 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Filippou, J., Cheong, C., Cheong, F.: A model to investigate preference for use of gamification in a learning activity. Australas. J. Inform. Syst. 22, 1–23 (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hur, H.J., Lee, H.K., Choo, H.J.: Understanding usage intention in innovative mobile app service: comparison between millennial and mature consumers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 73, 353–361 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee, J., Hammer, J.: Gamification in education: What, how, why bother? Acad. Exchange Q. 15(2), 146 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maier, T.A., Thomas, N.J.: Hospitality leadership course design and delivery: a blended-experiential learning model. J. Hospit. Tourism. Educ. 25(1), 11–21 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McMahan, A.: Immersion, engagement and presence: a method for analyzing 3-D video games. In: Wolf, M.J.P., Perron, B. (eds.) The Video Game Theory Reader, pp. 67–86. Routledge, London (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Webster, J., Martocchio, J.J.: Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Q. 16(2), 201–226 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth Ng
    • 1
  • Ivan Ka-Wai Lai
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kwan-Keung Ng
    • 2
  • Qi-Xuan Lyu
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of International Tourism and ManagementCity University of MacauTaipaMacao, Special Administrative Region of China
  2. 2.University of SunderlandCentralHong Kong
  3. 3.Faculty of Hospitality and Tourism ManagementMacau University of Science and TechnologyTaipaMacao, Special Administrative Region of China

Personalised recommendations