Intercultural Comparison of E-Learning Behaviors of Chinese vs. American Students

  • Shihua Chen BrazillEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1048)


This paper focuses on E-learning and intercultural studies of Chinese and American students. The paper is divided into six sections including Introduction, Intercultural Comparisons of Chinese and American Students, E-learning, Instructional Design for E-Learning, Cultural Theory for E-learning, and Conclusion. As a practical result, this paper is useful to researchers and practitioners who wish to know and understand cultural differences and E-Learning behaviors of Chinese and American students. This knowledge could enhance online teacher-student interactions, improve E-learning outcomes, and identify salient cultural communication differences.


Chinese and American Students E-learning Instructional Design for E-Learning Cultural Theory for E-learning 



I am thankful for the generous support from the Department of Education, the College of EHHD, and the Graduate School from Montana State University for the travel funding to present at the 4th International Conference on Technology in Education.


  1. Andrade, M.S.: International students in English-speaking universities: adjustment factors. J. Res. Int. Educ. 5(2), 131–154 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. Ardichvili, A., Maurer, M., Li, W., Wentling, T., Stuedemann, R.: Cultural influences on knowledge sharing through online communities of practice. J. Knowl. Manage. 10(1), 94–107 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. Bermejo, S.: Cooperative electronic learning in virtual laboratories through forums. IEEE Trans. Educ. 48(1), 140–149 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. Brazill, S.C.: Chinese to English translation: identifying problems and providing solutions (2016a).
  5. Brazill, S.C.: Factors that predict ACT science scores from a multicultural perspective. Educ. Res. Theory Pract. 30(2), 1–16 (2019)Google Scholar
  6. Brazill, S.C.: Analysis of human vs. machine translation accuracy. TRANSLATOLOGIA (2016b).
  7. Bista, K., Foster, C.: Issues of international student retention in American higher education. Int. J. Res. Rev. 7(2), 1–10 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. Bowen, R.S.: Understanding by Design. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching (2017). Accessed 11 Mar 2019
  9. Bloom, T.M.E.: Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman (1965)Google Scholar
  10. Chen, R.T.H., Bennett, S., Maton, K.: The adaptation of Chinese international students to online flexible learning: two case studies. Distance Educ. 29(3), 307–323 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. Cheng, X.: Asian students’ reticence revisited. System 28(3), 435–446 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. Chickering, A.W., Gamson, Z.F.: Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bull. 3, 7 (1987)Google Scholar
  13. Clifford, V.: Teaching international students (PPT presentation). Oxford Brookers University (2008).!/file/Teaching-International-Students-Presentation.ppt. Accessed 11 Nov 2018
  14. Colace, F., De Santo, M., Vento, M.: Evaluating on-line learning platforms: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003, p. 9. IEEE, January 2003Google Scholar
  15. Cultural Code Leveraging the workplace to meet today’s global challenges. Cultural Code (2011). Accessed 11 Nov 2018
  16. Fitzgerald, G., Koury, K., Mitchem, K.: Research on computer-mediated instruction for students with high incidence disabilities. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 38(2), 201–233 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., Archer, W.: Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education model. Internet High. Educ. 2(2–3), 87–105 (1999)Google Scholar
  18. Gay, G.: Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. J. Teacher Educ. 53(2), 106–116 (2002)Google Scholar
  19. Gorry, J.: Cultures of learning and learning culture: Socratic and Confucian approaches to teaching and learning. Learn. Teach. 4(3), 4–18 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. Granić, A., Ćukušić, M.: Universal design within the context of e-learning. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) UAHCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4556, pp. 617–626. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). Scholar
  21. Hall, E.T.: Beyond Culture. Anchor Press, New York (1976)Google Scholar
  22. Hofstede, G.: Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pac. J. Manage. 1(2), 81–99 (1984)Google Scholar
  23. Hofstede, G.: Country comparison (2018).,the-usa/. Accessed 11 Nov 2018
  24. Ho, D.Y.F.: On the concept of face. Am. J. Soc. 81(4), 867–884 (1976)Google Scholar
  25. Hu, H.C.: The Chinese concepts of “face”. Am. Anthropologist 46(1), 45–64 (1944)Google Scholar
  26. Hwang, K.K.: Face and favor: the Chinese power game. Am. J. Sociol. 92(4), 944–974 (1987)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. Ismail, J.: The design of an e-learning system: beyond the hype. Internet High. Educ. 4(3–4), 329–336 (2001)Google Scholar
  28. Kang, H., Chang, B.: Examining culture’s impact on the learning behaviors of international students from confucius culture studying in western online learning context. J. Int. Stud. 6(3), 779–797 (2016)Google Scholar
  29. Keller, J.M.: Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. J. Instr. Dev. 10(3), 2–10 (1987)Google Scholar
  30. Kennedy, P.: Learning cultures and learning styles: myth-understandings about adult (Hong Kong) Chinese learners. Int. J. Lifelong Educ. 21(5), 430–445 (2002)Google Scholar
  31. Kember, D.: Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students. High. Educ. 40(1), 99–121 (2000)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumaravadivelu, B.: A postmethod perspective on English language teaching. World Englishes 22(4), 539–550 (2003)Google Scholar
  33. Ladson-Billings, G.: But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Pract. 34(3), 159–165 (1995)Google Scholar
  34. Li, Y.: Cultural factors in translation. Persp. Stud. Translatol. 6(2), 175–182 (1998)Google Scholar
  35. Liu, S.H., Liao, H.L., Pratt, J.A.: Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Comput. Educ. 52(3), 599–607 (2009)Google Scholar
  36. Marzano, R.J., Pickering, D.J.: The Highly Engaged Classroom. Solution Tree Press (2010)Google Scholar
  37. Pratt, D.D., Kelly, M., Wong, W.S.S.: Chinese conceptions of ‘effective teaching’ in Hong Kong: towards culturally sensitive evaluation of teaching. Int. J. Lifelong Educ. 18(4), 241–258 (1999)Google Scholar
  38. Rapaille, C.: The culture code: an ingenious way to understand why people around the world live and buy as they do. Crown Pub, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  39. Sangrà, A., Vlachopoulos, D., Cabrera, N.: Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: an approach to the conceptual framework. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distributed Learn. 13(2), 145–159 (2012)Google Scholar
  40. Shabatu, J.: Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Write Effective Learning Objectives (2018). Accessed 11 Nov 2018
  41. Spizzica, M.: Cultural differences within “Western” and “Eastern” education. Acad. Commun. Across Disciplines Cultures 2, 248–257 (1997)Google Scholar
  42. Sit, H.H.W.: Characteristics of Chinese students’ learning styles. Int. Proc. Econ. Dev. Res. 62, 36 (2013)Google Scholar
  43. Swan, K.: Building learning communities in online courses: the importance of interaction. Educ. Commun. Inf. 2(1), 23–49 (2002)Google Scholar
  44. Triandis, H.C.: The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychol. Rev. 96(3), 506 (1989)Google Scholar
  45. Tu, C.H.: How Chinese perceive social presence: an examination of interaction in online learning environment. Educ. Media Int. 38(1), 45–60 (2001)Google Scholar
  46. Vivilaki, V., Johnson, M.: Research philosophy and Socrates rediscovering the birth of phenomenology. Nurse researcher 16(1), 84–93 (2008)Google Scholar
  47. Wang, H.: Teaching Asian students online: what matters and why? In: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, pp. 645–650. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2006)Google Scholar
  48. Wang, P., Wang, W.: Causes of and remedies for Chinglish in Chinese college students’ writings. Open J. Mod. Linguist. 2(02), 71 (2012)Google Scholar
  49. Wang, M.: Designing online courses that effectively engage learners from diverse cultural backgrounds. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 38(2), 294–311 (2007)Google Scholar
  50. Wan, G.: The learning experience of Chinese students in American universities: a cross-cultural perspective (1999)Google Scholar
  51. Wong, J.K.K.: Are the learning styles of Asian International students culturally or contextually based? Int. Educ. J. 4(4), 154–166 (2004)Google Scholar
  52. Xie, S.: Anxieties of modernity: a semiotic analysis of globalization images in China. Semiotica 2008(170), 153–168 (2008)Google Scholar
  53. Yeh, C.J., Huang, K.: The collectivistic nature of ethnic identity development among Asian-American college students. Adolescence 31(123), 645 (1996)Google Scholar
  54. Yu, J.: Cultural awareness in Chinese-English translation. Theory Prac. Lang. Stud. 3(12), 2322–2326 (2013)Google Scholar
  55. Yuan, W.: Academic and cultural experiences of Chinese students at an American university: a qualitative study. Intercultural Commun. Stud. 20(1), 141–157 (2011)Google Scholar
  56. Zeng, M. [曾敏]: The adaptation of Mainland Chinese research postgraduates to the Universities of Hong Kong, Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR (2006). Accessed 12 Nov 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationMontana State UniversityBozemanUSA

Personalised recommendations