Advertisement

An Exploratory Study on the Part-Time Teaching Staff Engagement on Canvas for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education

  • Kwan-Keung NgEmail author
  • Davey Yeung
  • Hector V. Rivera
  • K. Y. Lee
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1048)

Abstract

The use of Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) is an essential component of the teaching and learning strategy in higher education. This research paper aims to fill a gap in the literature by exploring the levels of utilisation of the Canvas VLE by part-time teaching staff at a higher education institution in Hong Kong with a view to understanding the factors influencing the level of use by teaching staff and pointing to how its use could further be enhanced for an improved teaching and learning experience. A survey of current academic research literature on VLE engagement by teachers was carried out in conjunction with structured questionnaires and interviews with teaching staff of the Hong Kong Higher Education (HE) institution. Issues in the research literature were corroborated by survey and interview findings and included lack of preparation time, lack of familiarisation with VLE features and technical issues. To address these issues, strengthening of preparation by teaching staff through practical familiarisation with the use of the VLE coupled with the dissemination of adequate instructional resources for both teaching staff and students supported by robust training sessions in the use of interactive communication features of the VLE were recommended.

Keywords

Virtual learning environment VLE eLearning Canvas Hybrid learning Teaching and learning Tertiary education 

References

  1. Alshammari, M.S.: Academics’ adoption and usage of learning management systems in Saudi Arabia’s universities. De Monfort University. ISNI: 0000000453501475. EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.659329 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. Alshorman, B.A., Bawaneh, A.K.: Attitudes of faculty members and students towards the use of the learning management system in teaching and learning. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 17(3), 1–15 (2018)Google Scholar
  3. Awang, H., Aji, Z.M., Yaakob, M.F.M., Osman, W.R.S., Mukminim, A., Habibi, A.: Teachers’ intention to continue using Virtual Learning Environment (VLE): Malaysian context. J. Technol. Sci. Educ. 8(4), 439–452 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boulton, C.A., Hywel, C.K., Williams, T.P.: Virtual learning environment engagement and learning outcomes at a ‘bricks-and-mortar’ university. Comput. Educ. 126, 129–142 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Canvas: Higher Education (2019). https://www.canvaslms.com.hk/higher-ed/. Accessed 9 Feb 2019
  6. Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K.: Research Methods in Education, 7th edn. Routledge, London (2011)Google Scholar
  7. Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Basics of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications Ltd., London (2008)Google Scholar
  8. edutechnica: EdTech Talk and Analysis. In: 6th Annual LMS Data Update, 6 October 2018. http://edutechnica.com/2018/10/06/6th-annual-lms-data-update/
  9. Gorshenin, A.: Toward modern educational IT-ecosystems: from learning management systems to digital platforms. In: 2018 10th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT), Moscow, Russia, pp. 1–5 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1109/icumt.2018.8631229
  10. Holmes, K.A., Prieto-Rodriguez, E.: Student and staff perceptions of a learning management system for blended learning in teacher education. Australia J. Teach. Educ. 43(3) (2018). http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol43/iss3/2
  11. Johnson, A.B., Tsang, C.D.: Chapter name in an edited book. In: Lee, K.L. (ed.) Understanding Student Engagement, pp. 234–256. Longman, Hong Kong (2016)Google Scholar
  12. Leung, E.F.: Online Learning. Pearson, Singapore (2018)Google Scholar
  13. Mapopa, W.S.: An analysis of technological issues emanating from faculty transition to a new learning management system. Q. Rev. Distance Educ. 17(1), 11–21 (2016). ISSN 1528-3518Google Scholar
  14. Maxwell, J.A.: Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Sage, London (2012)Google Scholar
  15. Ohliati, J., Abbas, B.S.: Measuring students satisfaction in using learning management system. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 14(4), 180–189 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.3391/ijet.v14i04.9427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ortiz, S., Green, M.: Trends and patterns of mobile learning: a study of mobile learning management system access. Turk. Online J. Distance Educ. 20(1), 161–176 (2019). http://ezproxy.sunderland.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1201956&site=eds-live&scope=siteCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pappas, C.: The Ultimate List of Open Source Learning Management Systems (2012) (2019 Update). https://elearningindustry.com/open-source-learning-management-systems
  18. Raga Jr., R.C., Rodavia, M.R.D.: Perceptions and utilization of a learning management system: an analysis from two perspectives. In: 2018 International Symposium on Educational Technology, 978-1-5386-7209/18 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1109/iset.2018.00017
  19. Tayşi, E., Başaran, S.: An investigation into university EFL students’ and instructors’ perceptions of using a learning management system. J. Lang. Linguist. Stud. 14(2), 100–112 (2018)Google Scholar
  20. Wichadee, S.: Factors related to faculty members’ attitude and adoption of a learning management system. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 14(4), 53–61 (2015)Google Scholar
  21. Wong, G.H., Yuen, I.J.: Open educational resources: Opportunities and threats. J. First Class Online Learn. 18(2), 128–138 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kwan-Keung Ng
    • 1
    Email author
  • Davey Yeung
    • 1
  • Hector V. Rivera
    • 1
  • K. Y. Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SunderlandCentralHong Kong SAR, China

Personalised recommendations