Advertisement

The Relationship Between Online Learning Behavior and Metacognition Based on Structural Equation Model

  • Zihong ZhaoEmail author
  • Xuehan Ren
  • Shiyin Yu
  • Jiayi Cai
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1048)

Abstract

With the rapid development of online learning, people are paying more and more attention to various factors that influence learners’ online learning behavior, especially the psychological factors related to learning. Based on the existing research results, this study focuses on the relationship between metacognition and online learning behavior, and constructs a structural relationship model. Through the analysis of 440 questionnaires, this study uses structural equation modeling to explore the relationship between them. The results show that metacognitive monitoring has a significant and positive direct impact on the three levels of online learning behavior, while metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive experience has an indirect impact on online learning behavior which take metacognitive monitoring as a mediator variable. At the same time, metacognitive monitoring and informational interactive behavior are important factors affecting conceptual interactive behavior, and metacognitive monitoring can also influence the conceptual interactive behavior through direct or indirect methods.

Keywords

Metacognition Online learning behavior Structural equation model 

References

  1. Flavell, J.H.: Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In: Resnick, L.B. (ed.) The Nature of Intelligence, pp. 231–235. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (1976)Google Scholar
  2. Flavell, J.H.: Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. Am. Psychol. 34, 906–911 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Shea, N., Boldt, A.: Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 18(4), 186–193 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kralik, J.D., Lee, J.H.: Metacognition for a common model of cognition. Comput. Sci. 145, 1–10 (2019)Google Scholar
  5. Urbach, N., Ahlemann, F.: Strucutral equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. J. Inf. Technol. 11, 5–24 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Iacobucci, D.: Structural equations modeling: fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. J. Consum. Psychol. 20, 90–98 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hayes, A.F.: Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun. Monogr. 76, 408–420 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhu, Z.L.: Online Learning Psychology Assessment Research, p. 144. Central Radio and Television University Press, Beijing (2015)Google Scholar
  10. Wei, S.P.: Analysis of the characteristics of online learning behavior and its influencing factors. Open Educ. Res. 18, 81–90 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. Wang, L.N.: Analysis and Evaluation of Online Learning Behavior. Shanxi Normal University, Shanxi, pp. 2–10 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. Chen, L.: Distance learning teaching interaction model and teaching interaction hierarchy tower. China Remote Interact. 3, 24–28 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. Peng, W.H., Yang, Z.K., Liu, Q.T.: Research on conceptual model construction of network learning behavior system. China’s Electrification Educ. 9, 39–46 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. Zhang, Y.M.: Metacognitive Development and Teaching, pp. 2–3. Anhui Education Press, Anhui (2012)Google Scholar
  15. Chen, Y.H.: Cognitive Developmental Psychology, pp. 312–344. Zhejiang People’s Publishing House, Zhejiang (1996)Google Scholar
  16. Dong, Q.: The discussion of metacognition. J. Beijing Normal Univ. 1, 68–74 (1989)Google Scholar
  17. Zheng, X.W., Yu, F.: Design strategy of network learning system based on metacognition. Mod. Distance Educ. 1, 64–66 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. Zhao, Y.J., Cai, Y.X.: Exploring the ways of training metacognitive strategies under the network learning environment. Exam. Wkly. 23, 69–70 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. Kong, L.L., Ma, Z.Q., Yi, Y.H., Yang, H.: Research on influencing factors model of online learning behavior—review based on behavioral science theory. Open Educ. Res. 5, 46–53 (2017)Google Scholar
  20. Li, Y.B., Wu, S.N., Yao, Q.H., Zhu, Y.Y.: Investigation and study on college students’ online learning behavior. Electrification Educ. Res. 11, 59–65 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information Technology in EducationSouth China Normal UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations