Motivational Model of Social Entrepreneurship: Exploring the Shaping of Engagement of Social Entrepreneur

  • Balram BhushanEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)


Value creation and capture connect the economy and society. Examining the relationship between them, this paper identified three types of social entrepreneurs. Further, I identified exemplar belonging to each type and analysed their motivational aspects. Here, Stimulus → Organism → Response (SOR) framework was used to develop a motivational model of social entrepreneurship. The findings elaborated that family and society are the two main sources of motivation. Both of them contribute differently and synergistically and facilitate the integration of ‘social’ and ‘entrepreneurial’ part of social entrepreneurship at the level of the organism and hence challenging the much-discussed integration of these two at the outcome level. Initially, negative emotion brought them in the process, but positive emotions kept them engaged. This transition of negative emotion to positive emotion created a self-perpetuating cycle of action–emotion sequence. Continued stimuli from society and family strengthen the process which resulted in expansion of ways of value creation.


Social entrepreneurship Engagement Value creation Emotion Society 


  1. Agafonow, A. (2014). Toward a positive theory of social entrepreneurship. On maximizing versus satisficing value capture. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 709–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich, H. E., & Cliff, J. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arend, R. J. (2013). A heart-mind-opportunity nexus: Distinguishing social entrepreneurship for entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 38, 313–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbalet, J. (2009). A characterization of trust, and its consequences. Theory and Society, 38, 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 555–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berger, S. (2008). K. William Kapp’s theory of social costs and environmental policy: Towards political ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 67, 244–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhowmick, S. (2011). Social cause venturing as a distinct domain. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhushan, B. (2018). Stimulated innovation cycle to serve the poor: A case of Mann Deshi Mahila Group. In Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Business Models (pp. 177–205). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brockhaus, R. H. (1980). Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 509–520.Google Scholar
  11. Chell, E. (2007). Social enterprise and entrepreneurship towards a convergent theory of the entrepreneurial process. International Small Business Journal, 25, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 173–208.Google Scholar
  13. Corner, P. D., & Ho, M. (2010). How opportunities develop in social entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 635–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37–57.Google Scholar
  15. Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22, 1203–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dees, J. G. (1998). Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76, 54–65.Google Scholar
  17. Dees, J. G., & Anderson, B. B. (2003). Sector-bending: Blurring lines between nonprofit and for-profit. Society, 40(4), 16–27.Google Scholar
  18. Eisen, A. (1978). The meanings and confusions of Weberian ‘rationality’. British Journal of Sociology, 29, 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glynn, M. A., & Lounsbury, M. (2005). From the critics’ corner: Logic blending, discursive change and authenticity in a cultural production system. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1031–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guclu, A., Dees, J. G., & Anderson, B. B. (2002). The process of social entrepreneurship: Creating opportunities worthy of serious pursuit. Center for the advancement of Social Entrepreneurship, 1–15.Google Scholar
  22. Hundley, G. (2006). Family background and the propensity for self-employment. Industrial Relations, 45, 377–392.Google Scholar
  23. Kalberg, S. (1980). Max Weber’s types of rationality: Cornerstones for the analysis of rationalization processes in history. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 1145–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuhn, J. W. (1998). Emotion as well as reason: Getting students beyond “interpersonal accountability”. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lerner, M. J. (2003). The justice motive: Where social psychologists found it, how they lost it, and why they may not find it again. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 388–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lockett, A., Currie, G., Finn, R., Martin, G., & Waring, J. (2014). The influence of social position on sensemaking about organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1102–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41, 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Majumdar, S. K. (2004). The hidden hand and the license raj to an evaluation of the relationship between age and the growth of firms in India. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Majumdar, S. K. (2007). Private enterprise growth and human capital productivity in India. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 853–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marshall, R. S. (2011). Conceptualizing the international for-profit social entrepreneur. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller, T. L., Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S., & Vogus, T. J. (2012). Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 37, 616–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Minniti, M. (2008). The role of government policy on entrepreneurial activity: productive, unproductive, or destructive? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 779–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mizik, N., & Jacobson, R. (2003). Trading off between value creation and value appropriation: The financial implications of shifts in strategic emphasis. Journal of Marketing, 67, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nicholls, A. (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 611–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parkan, B. (2008). Professionalism: A virtue or estrangement from self-activity? Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Partington, D. (2000). Building grounded theories of management action. British Journal of Management, 11, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41, 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Perrini, F., & Vurro, C. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: Innovation and social change across theory and practice. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 57–85). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rafaeli, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1987). Expression of emotion as part of the work role. Academy of Management Review, 12, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Robinson, J. (2006). Navigating social and institutional barriers to markets: How social entrepreneurs identify and evaluate opportunities. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship (pp. 95–120). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Santos, F. M. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26, 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sarker, P. C. (1994). Regional imbalances in Indian economy over plan periods. Economic and Political Weekly, 29, 621–633.Google Scholar
  44. Scaturo, D. J. (2001). The evolution of psychotherapy and the concept of manualization: An integrative perspective. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 522–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons, 48, 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shaver, K. G., & Scott, L. R. (1991). Person, process, choice: The psychology of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16, 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stinchcombe, A. L. (1986). Reason and rationality. Sociological Theory, 4, 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Thompson, J., Alvy, G., & Lees, A. (2000). Social entrepreneurship—a new look at the people and the potential. Management Decision, 38, 328–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Townley, B. (2002). The role of competing rationalities in institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 163–179.Google Scholar
  51. VanSandt, C. V., Sud, M., & Marmé, C. (2009). Enabling the original intent: Catalysts for social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 419–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society (G. Roth & G. Wittich, Eds.), Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  53. Weerawardena, J., & Mort, G. S. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of World Business, 41, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 519–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Xavier School of Rural ManagementXavier University, BhubaneswarPuriIndia

Personalised recommendations