Advertisement

Precarity, Migration and Brokerage in Indonesia: Insights from Ethnographic Research in Indramayu

  • Avyanthi AzisEmail author
  • Rhino Ariefiansyah
  • Nastiti Setia Utami
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter offers a structural analysis that problematizes the role of informal brokers in Indonesia’s labor outmigration. Drawing from ethnographic engagement in Indramayu, West Java, this chapter employs the concept of “precarity” in understanding the recruitment of Indonesia’s low-wage migrant workers. We push the collective understanding further through focusing on brokers, and how their precarity affects migration. For Indramayu’s informal brokers, brokerage is often just one among the many odd jobs they involve themselves in for their survival. Besides this, we direct attention to locals’ deep entanglement to argue that perpetuation of migration intermediation stems out of widespread acceptance of brokerage as a rural livelihood in the face of economic and ecological crises.

Keywords

Precarity Migration Brokerage Indonesia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Our work would not be possible without our Dermayon interlocutors’ generosity with their time, trust, and cultural knowledge of the world they live in. The authors would like to thank Johan Lindquist for his close reading of an earlier version of this chapter and supportive feedback, as well as well as participants of the workshop “The Migration Industry: Facilitators and Brokerage in Asia,” organized by the Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore, on June 1–2, 2017, for their thought-provoking comments. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies, whether public, commercial, or non-profit.

References

  1. Abdurrahim, A. Y., Dharmawan, A. H., Sunito, S., & Sudiana, I. M. (2014). Kerentanan ekologi dan strategi penghidupan pertanian masyarakat desa persawahan tadah hujan di Pantura, Indramayu. Jurnal Kependudukan Indonesia, 9(1), 25–44.Google Scholar
  2. BPS. (2013). Sensus Pertanian 2013 Provinsi Jawa Barat: Jumlah Rumah Tangga Usaha Pertanian Pengguna Lahan dan Rumah Tangga Petani Gurem menurut Wilayah Tahun 2003 dan 2013. Accessed August 5, 2019. https://st2013.bps.go.id/dev2/index.php/site/tabel?tid=22&wid=3200000000.
  3. Castles, S. (2015). Migration, precarious work, and rights: Historical and current perspectives. In C. U. Schierup, R. Munck, B. Likic-Brobric, & A. Neergaard (Eds.), Migration, precarity, and global governance: Challenges and opportunities for labour (pp. 46–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castles, S., de Haas, H., & Miller, M. J. (2013). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
  5. Cranston, S., Schapedonk, J., & Spaan, E. (2018). New directions in exploring the migration industries: Introduction to special issue. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(4), 543–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deshingkar, P. (2018). The making and unmaking of precarious, ideal subjects—Migration brokerage in the Global South. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2018.1528094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delgado-Wise, R. (2015). Migration and labour under neoliberal globalization. In C. U. Schierup, R. Munck, B. Likic-Brobric, & A. Neergaard (Eds.), Migration, precarity, and global governance: Challenges and opportunities for labour (pp. 25–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hansen, G. E. (1972). Indonesia’s green revolution: The abandonment of a non-market strategy toward change. Asian Survey, 12(11), 932–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hugo, G. (2000a). The impact of the crisis on internal population movement in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 36(2), 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hugo, G. (2000b). The crisis and international population movement in Indonesia. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 9(1), 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kalleberg, A. L., & Hewison, K. (2013). Precarious work and the challenge for Asia. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(3), 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kompas. (2015, October 16). BNP2TKI Kejar Calo dan Sponsor TKI Ilegal.Google Scholar
  13. Lee, C. K., & Kofman, Y. (2012). The politics of precarity: Views beyond the United States. Work and Occupations, 39(4), 388–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li, T. M. (2010). To make live or let die? Rural dispossession and the protection of surplus populations. Antipode, 41(1), 66–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lindquist, J. (2010). Labour recruitment, circuits of capital and gendered mobility: Reconceptualizing the Indonesian migration industry. Pacific Affairs, 83(1), 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindquist, J. (2012). The elementary school teacher, the thug and his grandmother: Informal brokers and transnational migration from Indonesia. Pacific Affairs, 85(1), 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Márquez, H., & Delgado Wise, R. (2011). A Southern perspective on forced migration and alternative development. Migración Y Desarrollo, 9(16), 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Munck, R. (2013). The precariat: A view from the South. Third World Quarterly, 34(5), 747–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Neilson, B., & Rossiter, N. (2008). Precarity as a political concept, or, fordism as exception. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Paret, M., & Gleeson, S. (2016). Precarity and agency through a migration lens. Citizenship Studies, 20(3–4), 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peluso, N. L., & Purwanto, A. B. (2018). The remittance forest: Turning mobile labor into agrarian capital. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 39(1), 6–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rudnyckyj, D. (2004). Technologies of servitude: Governmentality and Indonesian transnational labor migration. Anthropological Quarterly, 77(3), 407–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sano, A. (2012). Agency and resilience in the sex trade: Adolescent girls in rural Indramayu. Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 13(1), 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scott, J. (2009). The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Silvey, R. (2004). Transnational domestication: State power and Indonesian migrant women in Saudi Arabia. Political Geography, 23(3), 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sørensen, N. N. (2012). Revisiting the migration-development nexus: From social networks and remittances to markets for migration control. International Migration, 50(3), 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Spaan, E. (1994). Taikongs and calos: The role of middlemen and brokers in Javanese international migration. International Migration Review, 28(1), 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: A new dangerous class. London and New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  29. Standing, G. (2015). From denizens to citizens: Forging a precariat charter. In C. U. Schierup, R. Munck, B. Likic-Brobric, & A. Neergaard (Eds.), Migration, precarity, and global governance: Challenges and opportunities for labour (pp. 83–100). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vosko, L. F. (2010). Managing the margins: Gender, citizenship, and the international regulation of precarious employment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Government Documents

  1. BNP2TKI. (2014, December 10). Kepala BNP2TKI: Berantas Calo TKI, Aktifkan BLKLN dan Berdayakan TKI Purna. Accessed April 23‚ 2017. http://www.bnp2tki.go.id/read/9663/Kepala-BNP2TKI-:-Berantas-Calo-TKI-Aktifkan-BLKLN-dan-Berdayakan-TKI-Purna/.
  2. BPS Indramayu. (2016). Kabupaten Indramayu dalam Angka. Accessed April 23‚ 2017. https://indramayukab.bps.go.id/new/website/pdf_publikasi/Kabupaten-Indramayu-Dalam-Angka-2016.pdf.
  3. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Informasi BNP2TKI. (2016a). Data Penempatan dan Perlindungan Tenaga Kerja Indonesia Tahun 2016. Accessed April 11‚ 2017. http://www.bnp2tki.go.id/uploads/data/data_08-02-2017_111324_Data-P2TKI_tahun_2016.pdf.
  4. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Informasi BNP2TKI. (2016b). Data Penempatan TKI Tahun 2017 (s.d. Februari). Accessed April 11‚ 2017. http://www.bnp2tki.go.id/uploads/data/data_10-03-2017_092059_Laporan_Pengolahan_Data_BNP2TKI_2017_(FEBRUARI)_1.pdf.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Avyanthi Azis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rhino Ariefiansyah
    • 2
  • Nastiti Setia Utami
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of International RelationsUniversity of IndonesiaDepokIndonesia
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of IndonesiaDepokIndonesia
  3. 3.META Innovation LabJakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations