Advertisement

On Being Level-Headed

  • Kaya BarryEmail author
  • Jondi Keane
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the seeming rigidity of the built/urban environment through a series of performative artworks that offer insight into modes of resistance (by individuals and infrastructures) to affecting and being affected. In part, the discussion aims to open up the automatic process of perception and action to a radical empiricist perspective. The chapter explores the potential for materials and structures that have historically stabilised human and nonhuman agencies, to come into complex interactions, self-organise, and acquire new trajectories. This involves designating the boundaries of the senses, the body–environment, and the “natural” and the urban, to recalibrate, if not undo them. The performativity of enacting measure/s is the key aspect of a creative approach to measure and contribute to the world’s ongoingness.

References

  1. Adey, P., Bissell, D., Hannam, K., Merriman, P., & Sheller, M. (Eds.). (2013). The Routledge handbook of mobilities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily natures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Amin, A. (2014). Lively infrastructure. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(7/8), 137–161.Google Scholar
  4. Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2017). Seeing like a city. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, B., & Ash, J. (2015). Atmospheric methods. In P. Vannini (Ed.), Non-representational methodologies: Re-envisioning research (pp. 34–51). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, B., Kearnes, M., McFarlane, C., & Swanton, D. (2012). Materialism and the politics of assemblage. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2(2), 212–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrett, E., & Bolt, B. (Eds.). (2013). Carnal knowledge: Towards a ‘New Materialism’ through the arts. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  8. Barry, K. (2018). More-than-human entanglements of walking on a pedestrian bridge. Geoforum, online first article.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.10.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Braun, B., & Whatmore, S. J. (Eds.). (2010). Political matter: Technoscience, democracy, and public life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). Extended mind [online]. Retrieved August 29, 2010, from http://consc.net/papers/extended.html.
  13. Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: G.B. Putnam and Sons.Google Scholar
  14. Feyerabend, P. (1985). The problem of empiricism: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Grosz, E. (2017). The incorporeal: Ontology, ethics, and the limits of materialism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin with the Chthulucene. Durham and London: Duke University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harvey, P., & Knox, H. (2012). The enchantments of infrastructure. Mobilities, 7(4), 521–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker and the legacy of William James’s Radical Empiricism. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  19. Kauffman, S. (2000). Investigations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Latour, B. (2018). Down to earth: Politics in the new climatic regime. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  21. Le Corbusier, C. (1986). Towards an architecture (F. Etchells, Trans.). New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Lobo, M. (2016). Co-inhabiting public spaces: Diversity and playful encounters in Darwin. Australia. Geographical Review, 106(2), 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Massumi, B. (2011). Semblance and event: Activist philosophy and the occurrent arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Merriman, P. (2016a). Mobility infrastructures: Modern visions, affective environments and the problem of car parking. Mobilities, 11(1), 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Merriman, P. (2016b). Mobilities II: Cruising. Progress in Human Geography, 40(4), 555–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MoMA. (2019). Dada: MoMA Learning. Available at: https://www.moma.org/learn/moma_learning/themes/dada.
  28. Morgan, D. (2000). Kant trouble: The obscurities of the enlightened. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Mould, O. (2018). Against creativity. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  30. Petitot, J., Varela, F., Pachoud, B., & Roy, J. M. (1999). Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Shaw, R. E., & Mace, W. (2003). A Précis of a position to be established in the workshop on the challenges and promises of an ecological approach to robotics. In S. Rogers & J. Effken (Eds.), Studies in perception and action VII (pp. 201–206). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  32. Stoffregen, T. A. (2003a). Affordances as properties of animal-environment system. Ecological Psychology, 15, 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stoffregen, T. A. (2003b). Affordances are enough: Reply to Chemero, et al. Ecological Psychology, 15, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Turvey, M., & Shaw, R. E. (1979). The primacy of perceiving: An ecological reformulation of perception for understanding memory. In L. G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research (pp. 1–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Wagman, J. B., Stoffregen, T. A., Bai, J., & Schloesser, D. S. (2018). Perceiving nested affordances for another person’s actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(3), 790–799.Google Scholar
  36. Warren, W., & Shaw, R. E. (Eds.). (1985). Persistence and change. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Griffith Centre for Social and Cultural ResearchGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia
  2. 2.School of Communication and Creative ArtsDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations