Advertisement

Mitigating Enteric Methane Emission from Livestock Through Farmer-Friendly Practices

  • C. Valli
Chapter

Abstract

Enteric methane emission in ruminants in addition to being an environmental pollutant causes a loss of 10–11% of the total gross energy intake of the animal. The various strategies available to mitigate enteric methane emission include management strategies, feeding strategies, rumen manipulation and advanced strategies. Feeding strategies are practical approaches to mitigate enteric methane emission and can be practiced with ease by farmers under field conditions. Various approaches that cause rumen manipulation and thereby reduce enteric methane emission are supplementation of bacteriocins, ionophores, fats, oils, organic acids, probiotics, prebiotics, sulphate, halogenated methane analogues, nitroxy compounds, fungal metabolite, secondary plant metabolites, microalgae and exogenous enzymes. In the Indian context, ruminant livestock are grazed in wastelands or fed with poor-quality agricultural waste, whose digestibility is low, and the nutritional requirement of the animals is not met resulting in poor productivity. Improving per animal productivity is a potent tool to reduce enteric methane emission per unit of product produced, and this can be achieved through ration balancing. As regards the greenhouse gas abatement opportunities, measures to reduce enteric methane production have immense economic and ecological benefits to the farmers.

Keywords

Ruminants Enteric methane emission Mitigation Livestock management Manure management Pasture management Feed management Rumen manipulation Secondary metabolites 

References

  1. Archimede H, Eugène M, Marie-magdeleine C, Boval M, Martin C, Morgavi D, Lecomte P, Doreau M (2011) Comparison of methane production between C3 and C4 grasses and legumes. Fuel Energy Abstr 166:59–64Google Scholar
  2. Asanuma N, Iwamoto M, Hino T (1999) Effect of the addition of fumarate on methane production by ruminal microorganism in vitro. J Dairy Sci 82:780–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asiegbu FO, Paterson A, Morrison IM, Smith JE (1995) Effect of cell wall phenolics and fungal metabolites on methane and acetate production under in vitro conditions. J Gen Appl Microbiol 41:475–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayaru E, Kanda S, Kamada T, Itabashi H, Andoh S, Nishida T, Ishida M, Itoh T, Nagara K, Isobe Y (2001) Effect of fumaric acid on methane production, rumen fermentation and digestibility of cattle fed roughage alone. J Anim Sci 72:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM (2005) Methane emissions from feedlot cattle fed barley or corn diet. J Anim Sci 83:6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM (2006) Methane emissions from beef cattle: effects of fumaric acid, essential oil, and canola oil. J Anim Sci 84:1489–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beauchemin KA, Kreuzer M, O’Mara F, McAllister TA (2008) Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Aust J Exp Agric 48:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhata R, Malik PK, Kolte AP, and Gupta R (2016) Annual progress report on outreach project on methane. NIANP, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  9. Boadi D, Wittenberg KM, McCaughey WP (2002) Effects of grain supplementation on methane production of grazing steers using the sulphur (SF6) tracer gas technique. Can J Anim Sci 82:151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Busquet M, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A, Carro MD, Kamel C (2005) Effect of garlic oil and four of its compounds on rumen microbial fermentation. J Dairy Sci 88:4393–4404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Callaway TR, Carneiro De Melo AMS, Russell JB (1997) The effect of nisin and monensin on ruminal fermentations in vitro. Curr Microbiol 35:90–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calsamiglia M, Busquet P, Cardozo W, Castillejos L, Ferret A (2007) Invited review: essential oils as modifiers of rumen microbial fermentation. J Dairy Sci 90:2580–2595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carulla JE, Kreuzer M, Machmuller A, Hess HD (2005) Supplementation of Acacia mearnsii tannins decreases methanogenesis and urinary nitrogen in forage-fed sheep. Aust J Agric Res 56:961–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castillejos L, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A, Losa R (2005) Effects of a specific blend of essential oil compounds and the type of diet on rumen microbial fermentation and nutrient flow from a continuous culture system. Anim Feed Sci Technol 119:29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chaucheyras-Durand F, Chevaux E, Martin C, Forano E (2012) Use of yeast probiotics in ruminants: effects and mechanisms of action on rumen pH, fibre degradation, and microbiota according to the diet. Chapter 7. In: Rigobelo EC (ed) Probiotic in animals. Intech, Rijeka.  https://doi.org/10.5772/50192:119-152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chung YH, Zhou M, Holtshausen L, Alexander TW, McAllister TA (2012) A fibrolytic enzyme additive for lactating Holstein cow diets: ruminal fermentation, rumen microbial populations, and enteric methane emissions. J Dairy Sci 95:1419–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ciais P, Sabine C, Bala G et al (2013) Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Cosgrove GP, Muetzel S, Skipp R, Mace WJ (2012) Effects of endophytic and saprophytic fungi on in vitro methanogenesis. N Z J Agric Res 55:293–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dubois B, Tomkins NW, Kinley RD, Bai M, Seymour S, Paul NA (2013) Effect of tropical algae additives on rumen in vitro gas production and fermentation characteristics. Am J Plant Sci 4:34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duin EC, Wagner T, Shima S, Prakash D, Cronin B, Yanez-Ruiz DR, Duval S, Rumbeli R, Stemmler RT, Thauer RK, Kindermann M (2016) Mode of action uncovered for the specific reduction of methane emissions from ruminants by the small molecule 3-nitrooxypropanol. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:6172–6177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. FAO (2017) Reducing Enteric Methane for improving food security and livelihoods. www.fao.org/in-action/enteric-methane/background/why-is-enteric-methane.../en/
  22. Garg MR, Sherasia PL, Phondba BT, Sheike SK, Patel CT (2013) Effect of feeding balanced ration on milk production enteric methane emission and metabolic profile in cross bred cows under field conditions. Indian J Dairy Sci 66:113–119Google Scholar
  23. Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G (2013) Tackling climate change through livestock–A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), RomeGoogle Scholar
  24. Haque N (2001) Environmental implication of methane production: diet and rumen ecology. Short course, CAS in Animal Nutrition, IVRI, IzatnagarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hegarty RS (1999) Mechanisms for competitively reducing ruminal methanogenesis. Aust J Agric Res 50:1299–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ivan M, Koenig KM, Teferedegne B, Newbold CJ, Entz T, Rode LM, Ibrahim M (2004) Effects of the dietary Enterolobium cyclocarpum foliage on the population dynamics of rumen ciliate protozoa in sheep. Small Rumin Res 52(1–2):81–91Google Scholar
  27. Jahromi FM, Liang JB, Ho YW, Mohamad R, Goh YM, Shokryazdan P (2013) Lovastatin in Aspergillus terreus: fermented rice straw extracts interferes with methane production and gene expression in Methanobrevibacter smithii. Biomed Res IntGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson KA, Johnson DE (1995) Methane emissions from cattle. J Anim Sci 73:2483–2492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kamra DN, Agarwal N, Yadav MP (2004) Methanogenesis in the rumen and the Greenhouse effect on the environment. Livest Int 8(9):2–8Google Scholar
  30. Kamra DN, Agarwal N, Chaudhary LC (2005) Inhibition of ruminal methanogenesis by tropical plants containing secondary plant compounds. In: Soliva CR, Takahash J, Kreuzer M (eds) Proceeding of the 2nd international conference of greenhouse gases and animal agriculture. ETH Zurich, Zurich, pp 102–111Google Scholar
  31. Kannan A, Garg MR (2009) Effect of ration balancing on methane emission reduction in lactating animals under field conditions. Indian J Dairy Sci 62:292–296Google Scholar
  32. Kannan A, Garg MR, Mahesh Kumar BV (2011) Effect of ration balancing on milk production, microbial protein synthesis and methane emission in crossbred cows under field conditions in Chittoor district of Andhra Pradesh. Indian J Anim Nutr 28:117–132Google Scholar
  33. Kataria RP (2015) Use of feed additives for reducing green house gas emissions from dairy farms. Microbiol Res 6:6120Google Scholar
  34. Kobayashi Y, Wakita M, Hoshino S (1992) Effects of ionophore salinomycin on nitrogen and long-chain fatty acid profiles of digest in the rumen and the duodenum of sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol 36:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kolver ES, Aspin PW, Jarvis GN, Elborough KM, Roche JR (2004) Fumarate reduces methane production from pasture fermented in continuous culture. Proc N Z Soc Anim Prod 64:155–159Google Scholar
  36. Lee SS, Hsu JT, Mantovani HC, Russell JB (2002) The effect of bovicin HC5, a bacteriocin from Streptococcus bovis HC5, on ruminal methane production in vitro. FEMS Microbiol Lett 217:51–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee C, Hristov AN, Dell CJ, Feyereisen GW, Kaye J, Beegle D (2012) Effect of dietary protein concentration on ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from dairy manure. J Dairy Sci 95:1930–1941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lipper L, Thornton P, Campbell B et al (2014) Climate-smart agriculture for food security. Nat Clim Chang 4:1068–1072.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Machado L, Magnusson M, Paul NA, De Nys R, Tomkins N (2014) Effects of marine and freshwater macroalgae on in vitro total gas and methane production. PLoS One 9:e85289.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Malik PK, Bhatta R, Soren NM, Sejian V, Mech A, Prasad KS, Prasad CS (2015) Feed based approaches in enteric Methane Amelioration. livestock production and climate change. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 336–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Malik PK, Kolte AP, Dhali A, Seijan V, Thirumalisamy G, Gupta R, Bhatta R (2016) GHG emissions from livestock challenges and ameliorative measures to counter adversity. Intech Open.  https://doi.org/10.5772/6488J
  42. Martin SA (1998) Manipulation of ruminal fermentation with organic acids: a review. J Anim Sci 76:3123–3132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McAllister A, Newbold CJ (2008) Redirecting rumen fermentation to reduce methanogenesis. Aust J Exp Agric 48:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McGinn SM, Beauchemin KA, Coates T, Colombatto D (2004) Methane emissions from beef cattle: effects of monensin, sunflower oil, enzymes, yeast, and fumaric acid. J Anim Sci 82:3346–3356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McIntosh FM, Williams P, Losa R, Wallace RJ, Beever DA, Newbold CJ (2003) Effects of essential oils on ruminal microorganisms and their protein metabolism. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:5011–5014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mehra UR, Khan MY, Lal M, Hasan QZ, Das A, Har R, Verma AK, Dass RS, Singh P (2006) Effect of sources of supplementary protein on intake, digestion and efficiency of energy utilization in buffaloes fed wheat straw based diets. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 19(5):638–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Merino P, Ramirez-Fanlo E, Arriaga H, Del Hierro O, Artetxe A (2011) Regional inventory of methane and nitrous oxide emission from ruminant livestock in the Basque country. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166–167:628–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Morgavi DP, Forano E, Martin C, Newbold CJ (2010) Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants. Animal 4:1024–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Morgavi DP, Martin C, Boudra H (2013) Fungal Secondary metabolites from Monascus spp reduce rumen methane production in vitro and in vivo. J Anim Sci 91:848–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mutsvangwa T, Edward IE, Topp JH, Peterson GF (1992) Anim Prod 55:35–40Google Scholar
  51. Mwenya B, Santanso B, Sar C, Gano Y, Kobayashi T (2004) Effects of including beta 1-4 galacto oligosacharides, lactic acid bacteria or yeast culture on methanogenesis as well as energy and nitrogen metabolism in sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol 118:19–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Newbold CJ, Lassalas B, Jouany JP (1995) The importance of methanogens associated with ciliate protozoa in ruminal methane production in vitro. Lett Appl Microbiol 21:230–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Newbold CJ, López S, Nelson N, Ouda JO, Wallace RJ (2005) Propionate precursors and other metabolic intermediates as possible alternative electron acceptors to methanogenesis in ruminal fermentation in vitro. Br J Nutr 94(1):27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Patra AK (2014) Trends and projected estimates of GHG emissions from Indian livestock in comparison with GHG emissions from world and developing countries. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 27(4):592–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Patra AK, Kamra D, Agarwal N (2006) Effect of plant extract on in vitro methanogenesis, enzyme activities and fermentation of feed in rumen liquor of buffalo. Anim Feed Sci Technol 128:276–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pinares-Patiño CS, D’Hour P, Jovana JP, Martin C (2007) Effect of stocking rate on methane and carbon dioxide emissions from grazing cattle. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121:30–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Priano ME, Fuse VS, Ger JI, Berkovic AM, Williams KE (2014) Strong differences in the CH4 emission from feces of grazing steers submitted to different feeding schedules. Anim Feed Sci Technol 194:145–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ribeiro Pereira LG, Machado FS, Campos MM, Guimaraes Júnior R, Tomich TR, Reis LG, Coombs C (2015) Enteric methane mitigation strategies in ruminants: a review. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias 28(2):124–143Google Scholar
  59. Robertson LJ, Waghorn GC (2002) Dairy industry perspectives on methane emissions and production from cattle fed pasture or total mixed rations in New Zealand. Proc N Z Soc Anim Prod 62:213–218Google Scholar
  60. Saggar S, Bolan NS, Bhandral R, Hedley CB, Luo J (2004) A review of emissions of methane, ammonia, and nitrous oxide from animal excreta deposition and farm effluent application in grazed pastures. N Z J Agric Res 47(4):513–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Seo JK, Kim SW, Kim MH, Upadhaya SD, Kam DK (2010) Direct fed microbials for ruminant animals. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 23(12):1657–1667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sliwinski BJ, Soliva CR, Machmuller A, Kreuzer M (2002) Efficacy of plant extracts rich in secondary constituents to modify rumen fermentation. Anim Feed Sci Technol 101:101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smith P, Bustamante M, Ahammad H et al (2014) Agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU). In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx JC (eds) Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. Tarawali S, Herrero M, Descheemaeker K, Grings E, Blümmel M (2011) Pathways for sustainable development of mixed crop livestock systems: taking a livestock and pro-poor approach. Livest Sci 139:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Van Nevel CJ, Demeyer DI (1996) Control of rumen methanogenesis. Environ Monit Assess 42:73–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Venkatramanan V, Shah S (2019) Climate smart agriculture technologies for environmental management: the intersection of sustainability, resilience, wellbeing and development. In: Shah S et al (eds) Sustainable green technologies for environmental management. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., Singapore, pp 29–51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2772-8_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Waghorn GC (2007) Beneficial and detrimental effects of dietary condensed tannins for sustainable sheep and goat production: progress and challenges. Anim Feed Sci Technol 147:116–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wallace RJ, McEwan NR, McIntosh FM, Teferedegne B, Newbold CJ (2002) Natural products as manipulators of rumen fermentation. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 10:1458–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wallace RJ, Wood TA, Rowe A, Price J, Yanez DR (2006) Encapsulated fumaric acid as a means of decreasing ruminal methane emissions. Int Congr Ser 1293:148–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wedlock DN, Janssen PH, Leahy SC, Shu D, Buddle BM (2013) Progress in the development of vaccines against rumen methanogens. Animal 7(S2):244–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wolin MJ (1974) Metabolic interactions among intestinal microorganisms. Am J Clin Nutr 27:1320–1328CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Valli
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Animal NutritionTamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations