A Multi-criterion Optimization for Passive Building Integrated with Vacuum Photovoltaic Insulated Glass Unit

  • Junchao Huang
  • Xi ChenEmail author
  • Hongxing YangEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)


This article optimizes building design parameters to balance the building energy-saving and visual comfort objectives when utilizing the vacuum photovoltaic insulated glass unit (VPV IGU) as the building envelope. VPV IGU can reduce the air conditioning load as demonstrated in a previous study, where the window-to-wall ratio should be decreased to approximately 10% for energy saving. However, under such circumstance, the indoor visual comfort for the occupants cannot be guaranteed. With a simultaneous consideration of both the visual comfort and energy efficiency, this work explores the optimal passive building design through a multi-criterion approach based on the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II). The annual energy and indoor environmental conditions of the selected prototype office building are predicted with EnergyPlus. Obtained results are then subject to a decision-making process to determine the final optimum solution which can provide guidance in green building design within different urban contexts.


Passive building design Photovoltaic glazing Vacuum glazing Visual comfort Building energy conservation 



The work described in this paper was supported by the Teaching Postgraduate Studentship Scheme and the Research Institute for Sustainable Urban Development (project No.: 1-ZVED) of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University.


  1. 1.
    Skandalos, N., Karamanis, D.: PV glazing technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 49, 306–322 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peng, J., Curcija, D.C., Lu, L., Selkowitz, S.E., Yang, H., Zhang, W.: Numerical investigation of the energy saving potential of a semi-transparent photovoltaic double-skin facade in a cool-summer Mediterranean climate. Appl. Energy 165, 345–356 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang, W., Lu, L., Chen, X.: Performance evaluation of vacuum photovoltaic insulated glass unit. Energy Procedia 105, 322–326 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huang, J., Chen, X., Yang, H., Zhang, W.: Numerical investigation of a novel vacuum photovoltaic curtain wall and integrated optimization of photovoltaic envelope systems. Appl. Energy 229(May), 1048–1060 (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ochoa, C.E., Aries, M.B.C., van Loenen, E.J., Hensen, J.L.M.: Considerations on design optimization criteria for windows providing low energy consumption and high visual comfort. Appl. Energy 95, 238–245 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carlucci, S., Cattarin, G., Causone, F., Pagliano, L.: Multi-objective optimization of a nearly zero-energy building based on thermal and visual discomfort minimization using a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II). Energy Build. 104, 378–394 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tabatabaei, M., Jam, A.S., Hosseini, S.A.: Suspended sediment load prediction using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 7, 119–129 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cibse: Code for Lighting (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu, C., Gertner, G.: Understanding and comparisons of different sampling approaches for the Fourier Amplitudes Sensitivity Test (FAST). Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 55(1), 184–198 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Renewable Energy Research Group (RERG), Department of Building Services EngineeringThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHung HomHong Kong, China

Personalised recommendations