Parametric Optimization of Novel Partition-Type Radiant Heating Terminals to Improve Human Comfort in Cool Environments: Simulations Based on Experimental Results

  • Meng Wang
  • Nianping LiEmail author
  • Yingdong He
  • Jinbo Yan
  • Meiyao Lu
  • Fenglin Zhang
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)


This study aims to optimize the parameters of a set of partition-type radiant heating terminals to provide better thermal comfort for people in cool environments. The UCB Comfort Model was used to validate experimental results and optimize parameters of partition-type radiant heating terminals. The results indicated that the revised model established using the UCB Comfort Model was reliable when predicting overall thermal sensation of subjects with a deviation value of ± 0.3 in cool environments. On the basis of the simulation model, it was found that the surface temperature and position of the terminals played an important role in maintaining comfort of users in cool environments. The surface temperatures should be at least 55.5 and 33.5 °C with air temperatures at 14 and 16 °C. When surface temperatures were 50 °C and 60 °C, the minimum distances of radiant terminals at 14 °C should be 0.30 m and 0.61 m respectively, but at 16 °C, the distances can be increased to 1.29 m and 1.33 m.


Partition-type radiant heating terminals Thermal sensation UCB comfort model Parametric optimization 



This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 51878255).


  1. 1.
    Rupp, R.F., Vásquez, N.G., Lamberts, R.: A review of human thermal comfort in the built environment. Energy Build. 105, 178 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Imanari, T., Omori, T., Bogaki, K.: Thermal comfort and energy consumption of the radiant ceiling panel system.: comparison with the conventional all-air system. Energy Build. 30, 167 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    He, Y., Li, N., Zhou, L., Wang, K., Zhang, W.: Thermal comfort and energy consumption in cold environment with retrofitted Huotong (warm-barrel). Build. Environ. 112, 285 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang, H., Arens, E., Zhai, Y.: A review of the corrective power of personal comfort systems in non-neutral ambient environments. Build. Environ. 91, 15 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koelblen, B., Psikuta, A., Bogdan, A., Annaheim, S., Rossi, R.M.: Thermal sensation models: a systematic comparison. Indoor Air 27, 680 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng, Y., Niu, J., Gao, N.: Thermal comfort models: a review and numerical investigation. Build. Environ. 47, 13 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foda, E., Almesri, I., Awbi, H.B., Sirén, K.: Models of human thermoregulation and the prediction of local and overall thermal sensations. Build. Environ. 46, 2023 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang, H., Arens, E., Huizenga, C., Han, T.: Thermal sensation and comfort models for non-uniform and transient environments, part III: whole-body sensation and comfort. Build. Environ. 45, 399 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    ASHRAE: ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55: Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. ASHRAE (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, N., Yan, J., He, Y., Zhou, L., Tan, C., Li, J.: Analysis of the thermal comfort degree and the energy conservation facility of the partition-type radiant terminals during the winter season. J. Saf. Environ. 18, 1981 (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koelblen, B., Psikuta, A., Bogdan, A., Annaheim, S., Rossi, R.M.: Thermal sensation models: validation and sensitivity towards thermo-physiological parameters. Build. Environ. 130, 200 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meng Wang
    • 1
  • Nianping Li
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yingdong He
    • 1
  • Jinbo Yan
    • 1
  • Meiyao Lu
    • 1
  • Fenglin Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Civil EngineeringHunan UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations