Advertisement

Size-Dependent Removal Efficiency of Mechanical Ventilation System with Air Filtration Unit for Nanoparticles

  • Chen Chen
  • Bin ZhaoEmail author
Conference paper
  • 242 Downloads
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

Ultrafine particles (UFPs) are produced by human activities in outdoor and indoor environments. It is important to control indoor UFPs for their health effects on human and long duration that people spend indoors. Filtration is important in mechanical ventilation system for UFP removal to reduce human exposure to UFPs. The filtration efficiency for particle removal depends on particle diameter. Thus, we selected nine respective filters and their combinations to measure size-dependent efficiencies for UFP removal and the pressure drops. The 4th-order polynomial equations were developed from fitting results. The total efficiencies for UFP removal were estimated based on the polynomial equations and the measured size distributions of ambient UFPs. The total efficiencies for UFP removal and pressure drops of combinations of fine filters are comparable to those of a single HEPA filter. The application of combinations of fine filters needs further study in the future. The filtration efficiencies of these filters are relatively low, which may be caused by the lack of good tightness and need to be improved in the future.

Keywords

Ultrafine particle Filtration efficiency Pressure drop Indoor air quality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by grants of the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Number 2017YFC0702700), and funding from Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Number 51521005). The authors would like to thank Wenjing Ji for kindly helping with the measurements.

References

  1. 1.
    Karlsson, H.L., Gustafsson, J., Cronholm, P., Moller, L.: Size-dependent toxicity of metal oxide particles: a comparison between nano- and micrometer size. Toxicol. Lett. 188(2), 112–118 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pieters, N., Koppen, G., Van Poppel, M., De Prins, S., Cox, B., Dons, E., Nelen, V., Panis, L.I., Plusquin, M., Schoeters, G., Nawrot, T.S.: Blood pressure and same-day exposure to air pollution at school: associations with nano-sized to coarse PM in children. Environ. Health Perspect. 123(7), 737–742 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    HEI: HEI Review Panel on Ultrafine Particles: Understanding the Health Effects of Ambient Ultrafine Particles. Health Effects Institute, Boston, MA, USA (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leech, J.A., Nelson, W.C., Burnett, R.T., Aaron, S., Raizenne, M.E.: It’s about time: a comparison of Canadian and American time-activity patterns. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 12(6), 427–432 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duan, X.L.: Book Research Methods of Exposure Factors and Its Application in Environmental Health Risk Assessment. Science Press (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buonanno, G., Stabile, L., Morawska, L.: Personal exposure to ultrafine particles: the influence of time-activity patterns. Sci. Total Environ. 468, 903–907 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spalt, E.W., Curl, C.L., Allen, R.W., Cohen, M., Adar, S.D., Stukovsky, K.H., Avol, E., Castro-Diehl, C., Nunn, C., Mancera-Cuevas, K., Kaufman, J.D.: Time-location patterns of a diverse population of older adults: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution (MESA Air). J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 26(4), 349–355 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, C., Zhao, B.: Review of relationship between indoor and outdoor particles: I/O ratio, infiltration factor and penetration factor. Atmos. Environ. 45(2), 275–288 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, C., Zhao, Y.J., Zhao, B.: Emission rates of multiple air pollutants generated from Chinese residential cooking. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52(3), 1081–1087 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, C., Zhao, Y.J., Zhao, B.: Emission rates of ultrafine and fine particles generated from human smoking of Chinese cigarettes. Atmos. Environ. 194, 7–13 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seppanen, O., Fisk, W.J.: Association of ventilation system type with SBS symptoms in office workers. Indoor Air 12(2), 98–112 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lai, D.Y., Qi, Y., Liu, J.J., Dai, X.L., Zhao, L.: Ventilation behavior in residential buildings with mechanical ventilation systems across different climate zones in China. Build. Environ. 143, 679–690 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sultan, Z.M., Nilsson, G.J., Magee, R.J.: Removal of ultrafine particles in indoor air: performance of various portable air cleaner technologies. HVAC&R Res. 17(4), 513–525 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xu, T.F., Lan, C.H., Jeng, M.S.: Performance of large fan-filter units for cleanroom applications. Build. Environ. 42(6), 2299–2304 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ASHRAE: Book Standard 52.1: Gravimetric and Dust-Spot Procedures for Testing Air-Cleaning Devices Used in General Ventilation for Removing Particulate Matter. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers Atlanta, GA (1992)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ASHRAE: Book Standard 52.2: Method of Testing General Ventilation Air-Cleaning Devices for Removal Efficiency by Particle Size. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers Atlanta, GA (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    CEN: Book Standard EN 779: Particulate Air Filters for General Ventilation-Determination of the Filtration Performance. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    SAC: Book Air Filters. Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, China (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hinds, W.C.: Book Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Riley, W.J., McKone, T.E., Lai, A.C.K., Nazaroff, W.W.: Indoor particulate matter of outdoor origin: importance of size-dependent removal mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36(2), 200–207 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Azimi, P., Zhao, D., Stephens, B.: Estimates of HVAC filtration efficiency for fine and ultrafine particles of outdoor origin. Atmos. Environ. 98, 337–346 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vanosdell, D.W., Liu, B.Y.H., Rubow, K.L., Pui, D.Y.H.: Experimental-study of submicrometer and ultrafine particle penetration and pressure-drop for high-efficiency filters. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 12(4), 911–925 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hanley, J.T., Ensor, D.S., Smith, D.D., Sparks, L.E.: Fractional aerosol filtration efficiency of in-duct ventilation air cleaners. Indoor Air 4(3), 169–178 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wood, J., Sparks, L.: Development of performance data for common building air cleaning devices. Final Report No. EPA/600/R-08/013, United States Environmental Protection Agency (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shi, B.B., Ekberg, L.E., Langer, S.: Intermediate air filters for general ventilation applications: an experimental evaluation of various filtration efficiency expressions. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 47(5), 488–498 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Building Science, School of ArchitectureTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Beijing Key Laboratory of Indoor Air Quality Evaluation and ControlTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations