Economic and Social Development in the Republic of South Africa’s New Model of Mineral Rights: Balancing Private Ownership, Community Rights, and Sovereignty

  • Wojciech BańczykEmail author
Part of the Kobe University Monograph Series in Social Science Research book series (KUMSSSR)


The present chapter analyses the evolution of the legal regime relating to mineral ownership and management in the Republic of South Africa, introduced by the 2002 Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act as an example of the implementation of the notion of sustainable development. The introduction of the new system of state competences in the management of the mineral wealth has challenged the historical balance between the rights of varied subjects involved in the mining sector. Both mining industry investor protection and the economic development of the nation—including that of the local communities affected by mining activities—were taken into account. Also, the non-economic values of environmental protection, infrastructure protection, workers’ rights, and community participation were taken into account. The present chapter examines the rationale behind such legislative reform, and its content from the perspective of sustainable development, which, to a great extent, have been provided by extensive judicial review of the new legal regime at play.


Community interests Mineral rights Property rights State sovereignty Sustainable development 


  1. 1.
    Cawood, F. T., & Minnitt, R. C. A. (1995). A historical perspective on the economics of the ownership of mineral rights ownership, 11/12. Journal of Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Munslow, B., & Fitzgerald, P. (1994). South Africa: The sustainable development challenge. Third World Quarterly, 15.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Human Rights Watch. (2014). Whose Development? Human Rights Abuses in Sierra Leone’s Mining Boom.
  5. 5.
    Belinkie, S. F. (2015). South Africa’s land restitution challenge: Mining alternatives from evolving mineral taxation policies. Cornell International Law Journal, 48.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    United Nations Environment Programme. (2010). Sierra Leone environment, conflict and peacebuilding assessment 2,
  7. 7.
    Brown, O. et al. (2012). Environmental assessment as a tool for peacebuilding and development: Initial lessons from capacity building in Sierra Leone. In D. Jensen & S. Lonergan (Eds.), Assessing and restoring natural resources in post-conflict peacebuilding 9.
  8. 8.
    Mostert, H. (2012). Mineral law: Principles and policies.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dawis, K. E., & Michael, J. (2001). Trebilcock, legal reforms and development. Third World Quarterly, 22 (2001).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Gaay Fortman, B., & Mihyo, P. (1993). A false start—Law and development in the context of colonial legacy. Law and Police in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 26.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Merryman, J. H. (1977). Comparative law and social change: On the origins, style, decline and revival of the law and development movement. American Journal of Comparative Law, 24.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gopal, M. G. (1996). Law and development. Towards a pluralist vision. American Society of International Law Proceedings, 90.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marais, E. J. (2015). When does state interference with property (now) amount to expropriation? An analysis of the Agri SA court’s state acquisition requirement: Part 1 (Vol. 18). Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weiss, E. B. (1992). In fairness to future generations and sustainable development. American University International Law Review, 8.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barral, V. (2012). Sustainable development in international law: Nature and operation of an evolutive legal norm. European Journal of International Law, 23.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Campbell, N. J., Jr. (1956). Principles of mineral ownership in the civil law and common law systems. In Proceedings (American Bar Association. Section of International and Comparative Law).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wróbel, A. (2011). Ochrona własności. In L. Garlicki (Ed.), 2 Konwencja o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności. Komentarz do artykułów 19–59 oraz do protokołów dodatkowych.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rakoczy, B. (2015). In B. Rakoczy (Ed.), Prawo górnicze i geologiczne. Komentarz (LEX).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations