Advertisement

Neurospora Genetic Backgrounds Differ in Meiotic Silencing by Unpaired DNA (MSUD) Strength: Implications for Dp-Mediated Suppression of Repeat-Induced Point Mutation (RIP)

  • Durgadas P. KasbekarEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Neurospora strains bearing chromosome segment duplications (Dp strains) can be generated in the laboratory and are also recoverable from natural populations. Two “genome defense” processes, RIP (repeat-induced point mutation) and MSUD (meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA), impart some unusual phenotypes to Dp-heterozygous crosses. MSUD is an RNAi-based gene silencing of any gene not properly paired with a homologous sequence during meiosis. Efficient MSUD, as in the highly inbred N. crassa Oak Ridge (OR) background used for most genetic studies, can make Dp-heterozygous crosses barren and very non-productive. Our recent studies showed, however, that strains with inefficient MSUD are more widespread in nature than OR-type strains, and in them, Dp-heterozygous crosses can be non-barren. RIP occurs in the haploid nuclei of the pre-meiotic dikaryon and alters, via multiple G:C to A:T transition mutations, duplicated DNA sequences present in an otherwise haploid genome, and thus destroys duplicated genes. RIP-induced mutants can be recovered among the progeny of Dp-heterozygous crosses. Additionally, the presence of large Dps (> 250 kb) suppresses RIP in smaller gene-sized duplications (< 5 kb) in the same cross, presumably by titration of the RIP machinery. Thus, in an inefficient MSUD background a large Dp would enable a small duplication to escape RIP, whereas efficient MSUD induces barrenness and thereby suppresses the production of escapees. Our findings enable us to explain why only one Neurospora strain was found to contain an active transposable element, whereas all the other strains examined contained only its RIP-inactivated copies.

Keywords

Neurospora Neurospora crassa Repeat-induced point mutation (RIP) Meiotic silencing Meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA (MSUD) Transposable element 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank Dev Ashish Giri for preparing Fig. 8.1. I receive support as an Indian National Science Academy (INSA) Senior Scientist, in the Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics (CDFD), and I am an Honorary Visiting Scientist at the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB). Neurospora strains were obtained from the Fungal Genetics Stock Center, Manhattan, Kansas, USA (McCluskey et al. 2010).

References

  1. Bhat A, Kasbekar DP (2001) Escape from repeat-induced point mutation of a gene-sized duplication in Neurospora crassa crosses that are heterozygous for a larger chromosome segment duplication. Genetics 157:1581–1590PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhat A, Kasbekar DP (2004) Why are Neurospora crassa crosses that are homozygous for a large duplication barren? Fungal Genet Newslett 51:15–16Google Scholar
  3. Bhat A, Noubissi FK, Vyas M, Kasbekar DP (2003) Genetic analysis of wild-isolated Neurospora crassa strains identified as dominant suppressors of repeat-induced point mutation (RIP). Genetics 164:947–961PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bian Z, Ni Y, Xu JR, Liu H (2018) A-to-I mRNA editing in fungi: occurrence, function, and evolution. Cell Mol Life Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-018-2936-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao S, He Y, Hao C, Xu Y, Zhang H, Wang C, Liu H, Xu JR (2017) RNA editing of the AMD1 gene is important for ascus maturation and ascospore discharge in Fusarium graminearum. Sci Rep 7:4617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Decker LM, Xiao H, Boone EC, Vierling MM, Shanker BS, Kingston SL, Boone SF, Haynes JB, Shiu PKT (2017) The nuclear cap-binding complex mediates meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA. G3 7:1149–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fehmer M, Bhat A, Noubissi FK, Kasbekar DP (2001) Wild-isolated Neurospora crassa strains that increase fertility of crosses with segmental aneuploids used to establish that a large duplication suppresses RIP in a smaller duplication. Fungal Genet Newslett 48:13–14Google Scholar
  8. Freitag M, Williams RL, Kothe GO, Selker EU (2002) A cytosine methyltransferase homologue is essential for repeat-induced point mutation in Neurospora crassa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:8802–8807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galagan, J. E., S. E. Colvo, K. A. Borkovich, E. U. Selker, […] B. Birren 2003 The genome sequence of the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Nature 422: 859–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giri DA, Rekha S, Kasbekar DP (2015) Neurospora heterokaryons with complementary duplications and deficiencies in their constituent nuclei provide an approach to identify nucleus-limited genes. G3 5:1263–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giri DA, Rekha S, Kasbekar DP (2016) Crosses heterozygous for hybrid Neurospora translocation strains show transmission ratio distortion disfavoring homokaryotic ascospores made following alternate segregation. G3 6:2593–2600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giri DA, Pankajam AV, Nishant KT, Kasbekar DP (2019) The Neurospora crassa standard oak ridge background exhibits an atypically efficient meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA. G3 9:1487–1496Google Scholar
  13. Gladyshev E (2017) Repeat-induced point mutation and other genome defense mechanisms in fungi. Microbiol Spectr 5.  https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0042-2017
  14. Hammond TM (2017) Sixteen years of meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA. Adv Genet 97:1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Irelan JT, Selker EU (1996) Gene silencing in filamentous fungi: RIP, MIP and quelling. J Genet 75:313–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacobson DJ, Raju NB, Freitag M (2008) Evidence for the absence of meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA in Neurospora tetrasperma. Fungal Genet Biol 45:351–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kasbekar DP (2016) RNA-Seq, and ye shall find: sexual-stage-specific A-to-I RNA editing in fungi. J Biosci 41:171–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kasbekar DP, Singh PK, Ramakrishnan M, Kranthi Raj B (2011) Carrefour Mme. Gras: a wild-isolated Neurospora crassa strain that suppresses meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA and uncovers a novel ascospore stability defect. Fungal Genet Biol 48:612–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kinsey JA (1989) Restricted distribution of the Tad transposon in strains of Neurospora. Curr Genet 15:271–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kinsey JA, Helber J (1989) Isolation of a transposable element from Neurospora crassa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86:1929–1933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu H, Wang Q, He Y, Chen L, Hao C, Jiang C, Li Y, Dai Y, Kang Z, Xu JR (2016) Genome-wide A-to-I RNA editing in fungi independent of ADAR enzymes. Genome Res 26:499–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu H, Li Y, Chen D, Qi Z, Wang Q, Wang J, Jiang C, Xu JR (2017) A-to-I RNA editing is developmentally regulated and generally adaptive for sexual reproduction in Neurospora crassa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:E7756–E7765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCluskey K, Wiest A, Plamann M (2010) The Fungal Genetics Stock Center: a repository for 50 years of fungal genetics research. J Biosci 35:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Noubissi FK, McCluskey K, Kasbekar DP (2001) Repeat-induced point mutation (RIP) in crosses with wild-isolated strains of Neurospora crassa: evidence for dominant reduction of RIP. Fungal Genet Biol 31:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perkins DD (1997) Chromosome rearrangements in Neurospora and other filamentous fungi. Adv Genet 36:239–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perkins DD (2004) Wild type Neurospora crassa strains preferred for use as standards. Fungal Genet Newslett 51:7–8Google Scholar
  27. Perkins DD, Margolin BS, Selker EU, Haedo SD (1997) Occurrence of repeat induced point mutation in long segmental duplications of Neurospora. Genetics 147:125–136PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Perkins DD, Freitag M, Pollard VC, Bailey-Shrode LA, Selker EU, Ebbole DJ (2007) Recurrent locus-specific mutation resulting from a cryptic ectopic insertion in Neurospora. Genetics 175:527–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prakash A (2001) An alternative explanation for the reduced repeat-induced point mutation (RIP) efficiency in a gene-sized duplication in Neurospora crassa crosses heterozygous for a larger chromosome segment duplication. Fungal Genet Newslett 48:35Google Scholar
  30. Prakash A, Kasbekar DP (2002a) Genes encoding chimeras of Neurospora crassa erg-3 and human TM7SF2 proteins fail to complement Neurospora and yeast sterol C-14 reductase mutants. J Biosci 27:105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Prakash A, Kasbekar DP (2002b) The sterol C-14 reductase encoded by the Neurospora crassa erg-3 gene: essential charged and polar residue identified by site specific mutagenesis. Mol Gen Genomics 266:787–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Prakash A, Sengupta S, Aparna K, Kasbekar DP (1999) The erg-3 (sterol Δ14,15-reductase) gene of Neurospora crassa: generation of null mutants by repeat-induced point mutation and complementation by proteins chimeric for human lamin B receptor sequences. Microbiology 145:1443–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pratt RJ, Lee DW, Aramayo R (2004) DNA methylation affects meiotic trans-sensing, not meiotic silencing, in Neurospora. Genetics 168:1925–1935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramakrishnan M, Sowjanya TN, Raj KB, Kasbekar DP (2011) Meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA is expressed more strongly in the early than the late perithecia of crosses involving most wild-isolated Neurospora crassa strains and in self-crosses of N. tetrasperma. Fungal Genet Biol 48:1146–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Samarajeewa DA, Sauls PA, Sharp KJ, Smith ZJ, Xiao H, Groskreutz KM, Malone TL, Boone EC, Edwards KA, Shiu PKT, Larson ED, Hammond TM (2014) Efficient detection of unpaired DNA requires a homolog from the Rad54-like family of homologous recombination proteins. Genetics 198:895–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Selker EU (1990) Premeiotic instability of repeated sequences in Neurospora crassa. Annu Rev Genet 24:597–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shiu PKT, Raju NB, Zickler D, Metzenberg RL (2001) Meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA. Cell 107:905–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Singh PK, Kasbekar DP (2008) Titration of repeat-induced point mutation (RIP) by chromosome segment duplications in Neurospora crassa. Genetica 134:267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singh PK, Iyer SV, Ramakrishnan M, Kasbekar DP (2009) Chromosome segment duplications in Neurospora crassa: barren crosses beget fertile science. BioEssays 31:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Singh PK, Iyer SV, Nagasowjanya T, Kranthi Raj B, Kasbekar DP (2010) Translocations used to generate chromosome segment duplications in Neurospora can disrupt genes and create novel open reading frames. J Biosci 35:539–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Teichert I, Dahlmann TA, Kuck U, Nowrousian M (2017) RNA editing during sexual development occurs in distantly related filamentous ascomycetes. Genome Biol Evol 9:855–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vyas M, Ravindran C, Kasbekar DP (2006) Chromosome segment duplications in Neurospora crassa and their effects on repeat-induced point mutation (RIP) and meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA. Genetics 172:1511–1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and DiagnosticsHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations