Advertisement

Population and Employment Change in US Metropolitan Areas

  • Gordon F. MulliganEmail author
  • Helena A. K. Nilsson
  • John I. Carruthers
Chapter
Part of the New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives book series (NFRSASIPER, volume 40)

Abstract

The regional adjustment model is used to analyze changes in population and employment across the American metropolitan landscape between 1990 and 2015. Estimates are made for the effects of natural and human-created amenities on population change and the effects of wages, self-employment, patents, economic specialization, and age composition on employment change. Short-run impacts, estimated by linear regression, allow identification of a 2 by 2 “growth operator” matrix; long-run impacts are estimated by powering this matrix. In the early years of the 25-year study period, employment numbers largely drove population change, but, once the direction of causality reversed, population numbers largely drove employment change. Clearly, the balance between the overall effects of population and employment can shift over long periods of time.

Keywords

Regional adjustment model Population change Employment change American metropolitan Long-run impacts 

References

  1. Bartik T (1991) Who benefits from state and local economic development policies? W.E. Upjohn Institute, KalamazooCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beale C (1972) Rural and nonmetropolitan population trends of significance to National Population Policy. Economic Research Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. BizEE Degree Days (2018) See https://www.degreedays.net. Last accessed 11 Jan 18
  4. Boarnet M (1994) An empirical model of intrametropolitan population and employment growth. Pap Reg Sci 73:135–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borts G, Stein J (1964) Economic growth in a free market. Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bureau of Economic Analysis (2018) Interactive tables: personal income and employment. See https://www.bea.gov/regional/index/htm. Last accessed 11 Jan 18
  7. Carlino G, Mills E (1987) The determinants of county growth. J Reg Sci 27:135–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carruthers J, Mulligan G (2019) The regional adjustment model: an instrument of evidence-based policy. Forthcoming in: Capello R, Nijkamp P (eds) Handbook of regional growth and development theories, revised and 2nd edn. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carruthers J, Mundy B (eds) (2006) Environmental Valuation. Ashgate, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  10. Carruthers J, Vias A (2005) Urban, suburban, and exurban sprawl in the Rocky Mountain West: evidence from regional adjustment models. J Reg Sci 45:21–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark D, Murphy C (1996) Countywide employment and population growth. J Reg Sci 36:235–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DiPasquale D, Wheaton W (1996) Urban economics and real estate markets. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  13. Florida R (2002) The rise of the creative class. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Frey W (1993) The new urban revival in the United States. Urban Stud 30:741–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glaeser E (2007) The economics approach to cities. Working paper 13696. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  16. Glaeser E (2011) Triumph of the City. Penguin Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Godin K, Clemens J, Veldhus N (2008) Measuring entrepreneurship: conceptual frameworks and empirical indicators. Studies in entrepreneurship and markets. Fraser Institute, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  18. Graves P (1976) A re-examination of migration, economic opportunity, and the quality of life. J Reg Sci 16:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graves P (1979) A life-cycle empirical analysis of migration and climate, by race. J Urban Econ 6:135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenwood M (1975) Research on internal migration in the United States: a survey. J Econ Lit 13:397–433Google Scholar
  21. Herzog H, Schlottman A (1986) What can be learned from the recent migrants? Growth Chang 17:37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoogstra G, van Dijk J, Florax R (2017) Do jobs follow people or people follow jobs? A meta-analysis of Carlino-Mills studies. Spat Econ Anal 4:357–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Isserman A (ed) (1986) Population change and the economy: social science theories and models. Kluwer-Nijhoff, BostonGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaldor N (1972) The irrelevance of equilibrium economics. Econ J 82:1237–1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kelejian H, Prucha I (2010) Specification and estimation of spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive and heteroskedastic disturbances. J Econ 157:53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keyfitz N, Caswell H (2005) Applied mathematical demography, 3rd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Kirzner I (1973) Competition and entrepreneurship. University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  28. Moretti E (2012) The new geography of jobs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Mueser P, Graves P (1995) Examining the role of economic opportunity and amenities in explaining population redistribution. J Urban Econ 37:176–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mulligan G (2018) Patent generation in U.S. metropolitan areas. In: Bernhard I (ed) Revised papers presented at the 21st Uddevalla symposium on innovation, entrepreneurship and industrial dynamics in internationalized regional economies, Luleå, Sweden, 14–16 JuneGoogle Scholar
  31. Mulligan G, Carruthers J (2011) Amenities, quality of life, and regional development. In: Marans R, Stimson R (eds) Investigating quality of urban life. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 107–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mulligan G, Nilsson H (2020) Recent population and employment change in U.S. metropolitan areas. Forthcoming in: Chen Z, Bowen W, Whittington D (eds) Development studies in regional science: essays in honor of Kingsley E. Haynes. Springer, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  33. Mulligan G, Vias A, Glavac S (1999) Initial diagnostics of a regional adjustment model. Environ Plan A 31:855–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mulligan G, Reid N, Carruthers J, Lehnert M (2017) Exploring innovation gaps in the American space economy. In: Jackson R, Schaeffer P (eds) Regional research frontiers—vol. 1. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 21–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Muth R (1971) Migration: chicken or egg? South Econ J 37:295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Plane D, Heins F (2003) Age articulation of U.S. inter-metropolitan migration flows. Ann Reg Sci 37:107–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Plane D, Rogerson P (1994) The geographical analysis of population. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Roback J (1982) Wages, rent, and the quality of life. J Polit Econ 90:1257–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rogers A (1968) Matrix analysis of interregional population growth and distribution. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  40. Rogers A (1971) Matrix methods in urban and regional analysis. Holden-Day, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosen S (1979) Wage-based indexes of urban quality of life. In: Mieszkowski P, Straszheim M (eds) Current issues in urban economics. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 74–104Google Scholar
  42. Savageau D (2007) Places rated almanac, 7th edn. Places Rated Books, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Savageau D, Boyer R (1993) Places rated almanac, 4th edn. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Shearer C, Shah I, Friedhoff A, Berube A (2018) Metro monitor 2018. Brookings Institute. See https://www.brookings.edu/research/metro-monitor-2018. Last accessed 11 Jan 18
  45. Sjaastad L (1962) The costs and returns of human migration. J Polit Econ 70(Supplement):80–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Steinnes D (1977) Causality and intraurban location. J Urban Econ 4:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Steinnes D, Fisher W (1974) An econometric model of intraurban location. J Reg Sci 14:65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tsvetkova A (2015) Innovation, entrepreneurship, and metropolitan economic performance: empirical test of recent theoretical propositions. Econ Dev Q 29:299–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. U.S. Census Bureau (2018) See https://www.census.gov. Last accessed 11 Jan 18
  50. U.S. Patent and Trade Office (2018) Calendar year patent statistics: listing of all U.S. metropolitan and micropolitan areas, total patent utility counts, 2000–2015. See https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/reports_cbsa.htm. Last accessed 11 Jan 18

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gordon F. Mulligan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Helena A. K. Nilsson
    • 2
  • John I. Carruthers
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Geography and DevelopmentUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Retail Economics and Centre for Entrepreneurship and Spatial EconomicsJönköping International Business SchoolJönköpingSweden
  3. 3.Department of City and Regional Planning and Graduate Field of Regional ScienceCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations