Advertisement

Virtual Environment for Remote Control of UGVs Using a Haptic Device

  • F. Roberto Segura
  • Pilar Urrutia-Urrutia
  • Z. Andrea Sánchez
  • C. Tomás Núñez
  • T. Santiago Alvarez
  • L. Franklin Salazar
  • Santiago Altamirano
  • Jorge BueleEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 152)

Abstract

This paper presents a virtual reality environment designed for military training personnel, focused on the remote control of unmanned land vehicles. The environment design has been made in the V-REP software, where a prototype of an explorer robot based on the kinematic model of a unicycle is presented. This vehicle is attached with proximity sensors to detect obstacles and thus be able to avoid them. Instead of operating with a conventional joystick that only allows the use of push buttons, a haptic device with force feedback is used with which the user experiences a more realistic immersive situation. In this context, the person can manipulate the unmanned vehicle direction and perceive when there is a collision with a nearby object as if it were on the site. To link the input device (Novint Falcon) with the virtual interface, the device mathematical modelling is carried out, and through MATLAB, the respective processing and the implementation of the proportional–integral–derivative (PID) control algorithm for the displacement are made. The after-scenario questionnaire (ASQ) test is used, and a general average of 1.78/7 is obtained. Being a value close to 1, it shows the acceptance that the system has for the users.

Keywords

Haptic interface Force feedback Training Teleoperation Unmanned ground vehicle Virtual reality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

To the authorities of Universidad Técnica de Ambato (UTA), Dirección de Investigación y Desarrollo (DIDE), Instituto Tecnológico Superior Guayaquil—Ambato and CELEC EP., for supporting this work and future research.

References

  1. 1.
    Mosey, S., Guerrero, M., Greenman, A.J.: Technology entrepreneurship research opportunities: insights from across Europe. J. Technol. Transfer 42(1), 1–9 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McCarthy, J., Wright, P.: The Enchantments of Technology. Human–Computer Interaction Series, pp. 359–373. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zieliński, C., Winiarski, T., Kornuta, T.: Agent-based structures of robot systems. In: The 19th Polish Control Conference, KKA 2017, pp. 493–502. Springer (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kunze, L., Hawes, N., Duckett, T., Hanheide, M., Krajník, T.: Artificial intelligence for long-term robot autonomy: a survey. IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett. 3(4), 4023–4030 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choi, S.Y.: Agent-based human-robot interaction simulation model for the analysis of operator performance in the supervisory control of UGVs. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 19(5), 685–693 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aguilar, W.G., Rodríguez, G.A., Álvarez, L., Sandoval, S., Quisaguano, F., Limaico, A.: On-board visual SLAM on a UGV using a RGB-D camera. In: 10th International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Applications, ICIRA 2017, pp. 298–308. Springer (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arbanas, B., et al.: Decentralized planning and control for UAV–UGV cooperative teams. Auton. Rob. 42(8), 1601–1618 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, H.: Adaptive control of robot manipulators with uncertain kinematics and dynamics. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 62(2), 948–954 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stevens, J.A., Kincaid, J.P.: The relationship between presence and performance in virtual simulation training. Open J. Model. Simul. 3(2), 41–48 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith, M.J., et al.: Virtual reality job interview training for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J. Vocat. Rehabil. 42(3), 271–279 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Siu, K.C., Best, B.J., Kim, J.W., Oleynikov, D., Ritter, F.E.: Adaptive virtual reality training to optimize military medical skills acquisition and retention. Mil. Med. 181(5), 214–220 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ibari, B., Ahmed-Foitih, Z., Reda, H.E.A.: Remote control of mobile robot using the virtual reality. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 5(5) (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tikanmäki, A., Bedrník, T., Raveendran, R., Röning, J.: The remote operation and environment reconstruction of outdoor mobile robots using virtual reality. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), pp. 1526–1531 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lwowski, J., Joordens, M., Majumdar, A., Benavidez, P., Prevost, J.J., Jamshidi, M.: The utilization of virtual reality as a system of systems research tool. In: 2018 IEEE 13th Annual Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SoSE), pp. 535–540 (2018)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lewis, J.R.: IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 7(1), 57–78 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Técnica de AmbatoAmbatoEcuador
  2. 2.Instituto Tecnológico Superior Guayaquil—AmbatoAmbatoEcuador
  3. 3.CELEC EPBañosEcuador

Personalised recommendations