Advertisement

Impact Assessment of LUCC on Ecosystem Services

  • Youjia LiangEmail author
  • Lijun Liu
  • Jiejun Huang
Chapter
Part of the Springer Geography book series (SPRINGERGEOGR)

Abstract

The ecosystem services (ESs) concept is based on socio-ecological complexity integrated with local decision demands. It helps prevent both regional ecological degradation and conflicts associated with large-scale land-use/coverage change (LUCC). In this study, an integrated assessment method was developed to analyze spatio-temporal changes in the supply capacities of ESs in a typical land system dynamics in Gansu Province, northwest with long time series LUCC maps (1992–2015). The LUCC analysis showed rapid expansion of grassland and cultivated land was occured in Gannan and Qingyang cities, respectively, which was attributed to conversion of forests and bare land. The supply capacity of ESs indicated an increasing trend (cultural service > supporting service > provisioning service > regulating service) which was associated with positive changes in multiple ESs. However, the decrease in specific services likely caused unexpected losses which potentially offset profits from the current management of the socio-ecological system. Therefore, this study provided an integrated assessment of the effects of changing land system dynamics on the potential provision of ESs in typical semiarid and arid regions.

References

  1. Bagstad KJ, Semmens DJ, Winthrop R (2013) Comparing approaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modeling: a case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona. Ecosyst Serv 5:40–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnaud C, Corbera E, Muradian R et al (2018) Ecosystem services, social interdependencies, and collective action: a conceptual framework. Ecol Soc 23:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burkhard B, Petrosillo I, Costanza R (2010) Ecosystem services–bridging ecology, economy and social sciences. Ecol Complex 7:257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Costanza R, Groot RD, Sutton P et al (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Chang 26:152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Costanza R, Fioramonti L, Kubiszewski I (2016) The UN sustainable development goals and the dynamics of well-being. Front Ecol Environ 14(2):59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crossman ND, Burkhard B, Nedkov S et al (2013) A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 4:4–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J et al (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daw TM, Coulthard S, Cheung WW et al (2015) Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being. Proc Natl Acad Sci: 201414900Google Scholar
  9. Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J et al (2015) The IPBES conceptual framework—connecting nature and people. Curr Opin Env Sustain 14:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eichler Inwood SE, López-Ridaura S, Kline KL et al (2018) Assessing sustainability in agricultural landscapes: a review of approaches 1, 2. Env Rev 26:299–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ESA (2017) Land cover CCI product user guide version 2. European Space AgencyGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ 68:643–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Getis A, Ord JK (1992) The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geograph Anal 24(3):189–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibbs HK, Ruesch AS, Achard F et al (2010) Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. PNAS 107:16732–16737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. GLP (2005) Global land project. Science plan and implementation strategy. IGBP Report no. 53/IHDP Report no. 19. IGBP Secretariat, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  16. Gong J, Liu D, Zhang J et al (2019) Tradeoffs/synergies of multiple ecosystem services based on land use simulation in a mountain-basin area, western China. Ecol Ind 99:283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grekousis G, Mountrakis G, Kavouras M (2015) An overview of 21 global and 43 regional land-cover mapping products. Int J Remote Sens 36:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Inkoom JN, Frank S, Greve K et al (2018) A framework to assess landscape structural capacity to provide regulating ecosystem services in West Africa. J Env Manag 209:393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacobs S, Burkhard B, Daele TV et al (2015) ‘The matrix reloaded’: a review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services. Ecol Model 295:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Júnior JLS, Tomasella J, Rodriguez DA (2015) Impacts of future climatic and land cover changes on the hydrological regime of the Madeira River basin. Clim Chang 129(1–2):117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kandziora M, Burkhard B, Müller F (2013) Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators—a theoretical matrix exercise. Ecol Ind 28:54–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuemmerle T, Levers C, Erb K et al (2016) Hotspots of land use change in Europe. Env Res Lett 11(6):064020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P (2011) Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. PNAS 108:3465–3472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Law M, Collins A (2015) Getting to know ArcGIS. ESRI Press, Redlands, p 768Google Scholar
  25. Lawler JJ, Lewis DJ, Nelson E et al (2014) Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the United States. PNAS 111(20):7492–7497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li Z, Wu W, Liu X et al (2017) Land use/cover change and regional climate change in an arid grassland ecosystem of Inner Mongolia, China. Ecol Model 353:86–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li W, MacBean N, Ciais P et al (2018a) Gross and net land cover changes in the main plant functional types derived from the annual ESA CCI land cover maps (1992–2015). Earth Syst Sci Data 10(1):219–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li S, Zhang Y, Wang Z et al (2018b) Mapping human influence intensity in the Tibetan Plateau for conservation of ecological service functions. Ecosyst Serv 30:276–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liang Y, Liu L (2017) An integrated ecosystem service assessment in an artificial desert oasis of northwestern China. J Land Use Sci 12:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liang Y, Zhongmin XU, Zhong F (2013) An spatial ecosystem services approach based on LUCC: a case study of Ganzhou district of Zhangye City. Acta Ecol Sin 33:4758–4766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liang Y, Liu L, Huang J (2017) Integrating the SD-CLUE-S and InVEST models into assessment of oasis carbon storage in northwestern China. PLoS ONE 12:e0172494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu J, Li S, Ouyang Z et al (2008) Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s policies for ecosystem services. PNAS 105:9477–9482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu C, Dong X, Liu Y (2015) Changes of NPP and their relationship to climate factors based on the transformation of different scales in Gansu, China. Catena 125:190–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu J, Hull V, Godfray HCJ et al (2018) Nexus approaches to global sustainable development. Nat Sustain 1(9):466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lorencová E, Frélichová J, Nelson E et al (2013) Past and future impacts of land use and climate change on agricultural ecosystem services in the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy 33:183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mace GM, Norris K, Fitter AH (2012) Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol Evol 27:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  38. Nahuelhual L, Carmona A, Aguayo M et al (2014) Land use change and ecosystem services provision: a case study of recreation and ecotourism opportunities in southern Chile. Landscape Ecol 29(2):329–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R et al (2008) Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. PNAS 105(28):9495–9500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J et al (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Env 7:4–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ord JK, Getis A (1995) Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geograph Anal 27(4):286–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ouyang Z, Zheng H, Xiao Y et al (2016) Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science 352:1455–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schild JEM, Vermaat JE, Groot RSD et al (2018) A global meta-analysis on the monetary valuation of dryland ecosystem services: the role of socio-economic, environmental and methodological indicators. Ecosyst Serv 32:78–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Song W, Deng X (2017) Land-use/land-cover change and ecosystem service provision in China. Sci Total Env 576:705–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sun F, Lyu Y, Fu B et al (2016) Hydrological services by mountain ecosystems in Qilian Mountain of China: a review. Chin Geograph Sci 26:174–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Turner MG, Donato DC, Romme WH (2013) Consequences of spatial heterogeneity for ecosystem services in changing forest landscapes: priorities for future research. Landscape Ecol 28:1081–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vihervaara P, Kumpula T, Tanskanen A et al (2010) Ecosystem services–a tool for sustainable management of human–environment systems. Case study Finnish Forest Lapland. Ecol Complex 7:410–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vihervaara P, Franzese PP, Buonocore E (2019) Information, energy, and eco-exergy as indicators of ecosystem complexity. Ecol Model 395:23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang S, Meng X, Guan C et al (2017) Effects of vegetation on debris flow mitigation: a case study from Gansu province, China. Geomorphology 282:64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wen X, Wu X, Meng G (2017) Spatiotemporal variability of temperature and precipitation in Gansu Province (Northwest China) during 1951–2015. Atmos Res 197:132–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Resources and Environmental EngineeringWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.Department of NavigationWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations