Advertisement

How Do You Catch Drug Smugglers in the Open Sea?

  • Javier Guerrero C.
Chapter

Abstract

As the seas have been increasingly used by drug smugglers, the Colombian Navy has played a central role in the interdiction of illicit drug flows. The author provides evidence of the many spaces in which the technologies and practices for interdiction are shaped. Long-term plans are an attempt to crystalise the role of the Navy as an able agency in the War on Drugs, there, visions and images of the enemy are entangled. During a Maritime Interdiction Operation (MIO), the Navy personnel deploy diverse forms of knowledge. The patrol boat is key, and its qualities and characteristics are constantly reviewed and adjusted by the Navy personal in the field according to the perception of the enemy capabilities. Intelligence is crucial for the Navy actions, and helps to reduce uncertainty. The author argues that Ignorance Studies are useful to understand the paradoxical results of the Navy actions.

Keywords

Maritime Interdiction Operations Intelligence Ignorance Studies War on Drugs 

References

  1. Armada República de Colombia. (2003). Plan Estratégico Naval 2003–2006. Bogotá, DC: Armada República de Colombia.Google Scholar
  2. Armada República de Colombia. (2005). La Aviacion Naval y el Cuerpo de Guardacostas. A La Mar, 2.Google Scholar
  3. Armada República de Colombia. (2007). Plan Estrategico Naval, 2007–2010.Google Scholar
  4. Armada República de Colombia. (2011). Plan Estratégico Naval 2011–2014. Bogotá, DC: Armada República de Colombia.Google Scholar
  5. Armada República de Colombia. (2015). Navy’s Strategy to Fight Transnational Crimes. Naval Forces, International Forum for Maritime Power, XXXVI(SPECIAL ISSUE 2015), 29–32.Google Scholar
  6. Bright, D. A., & Delaney, J. J. (2013). Evolution of a Drug Trafficking Network: Mapping Changes in Network Structure and Function Across Time. Global Crime, 14(2–3), 238–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Decker, S. H., & Townsend Chapman, M. (2008). Drug Smugglers on Drug Smuggling Lessons from the Inside. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Echeverry, J. C. (2004). Colombia and the war on drugs: How short is the short run? Bogotá, Colombia: CEDE, Universidad de los Andes.Google Scholar
  9. El Tiempo. (1994, September). Parte del Atlántico, a Merced de los Narcos. El Tiempo. Retrieved from http://www.eltiempo.com/archivo/documento/MAM-202862
  10. Franklin, J. (2009). Así son los submarinos hechizos que transportan hasta 10.000 kilos de cocaína. Bogotá, Colombia: Don Juan.Google Scholar
  11. Gootenberg, P. (2005). Talking Like a State: Drugs, Borders, and the Language of Control. In W. van Schendel & A. Itty (Eds.), Illicit Flows and Criminal Things States, Borders, and the Other Side of Globalization (pp. 101–127). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gootenberg, P. (2009). Talking About the Flow: Drugs, Borders, and the Discourse of Drug Control. Cultural Critique, 71(1), 13–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gross, M., & McGoey, L. (2015). Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Guerrero Castro, J. (2017). Maritime Interdiction in the War on Drugs in Colombia: Practices, Technologies and Technological Innovation. Edinburgh, UK: The University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, L. K., & Jackson, P. (2010). On Uncertainty and the Limits of Intelligence. In L. K. Johnson (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of National Security Intelligence (pp. 452–471). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kawell, J. (2001, May 1). Closing the Latin American air-bridge: A disturbing history. Foreign Policy in Focus.Google Scholar
  17. Kenney, M. (2003). Intelligence Games: Comparing the Intelligence Capabilities of Law Enforcement Agencies and Drug Trafficking Enterprises. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 16(2), 212–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kenney, M. (2007). The Architecture of Drug Trafficking: Network Forms of Organisation in the Colombian Cocaine Trade. Global Crime, 8(3), 233–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Law, J. (2003). Ordering and Obduracy. Lancaster, UK: Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University.Google Scholar
  20. Martin, C. (2012). Desperate Mobilities: Logistics, Security and the Extra-Logistical Knowledge of ‘Appropriation’. Geopolitics, 17(2), 355–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Másmela, C. C., & Tickner, A. B. (2017). Desecuritizing the ‘War on Drugs’. In M. A. G. Suarez, R. D. Villa, & B. Weiffen (Eds.), Power Dynamics and Regional Security in Latin America (pp. 295–318). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McDermott, J. (2018). Militarisation of the Drug War in Latin America: A Policy Cycle Set to Continue? In T. Reitano, S. Jesperson, & L. Bird Ruiz-Benitez de Lugo (Eds.), Militarised Responses to Transnational Organised Crime: The War on Crime (pp. 259–277). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McLay, J. M. (2015). Joint Interagency Task Forces; the Right Model to Combat Transnational Organised Crime? Newport, RI: Naval War College (U.S.), Joint Military Operations Department.Google Scholar
  24. Mejía, D., & Restrepo, P. (2008). The War on Illegal Drug Production and Trafficking: An Economic Evaluation of Plan Colombia (p. 60). Bogotá, DC: Universidad de Los Andes; CEDE-Centro de Estudios sobre Desarrollo Económico.Google Scholar
  25. Ministerio de Defensa. (2008). Un año para la historia República de Colombia Ministerio de Defensa Nacional Informe anual Ministerio de Defensa | Julio 2007–Julio 2008. Bogotá, DC.Google Scholar
  26. Moloeznik, M. P. (2003). The Military Dimension of the War on Drugs in Mexico and Colombia. Crime, Law and Social Change, 40(1), 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Munsing, E., & Lamb, C. J. (2011). Joint Interagency Task Force-South: The Best Known, Least Understood Interagency Success. Washington, DC: Institute for National Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
  28. NATO. (2005). Allied Maritime Interdiction Operations. Brussels.Google Scholar
  29. Proctor, R. N. (2008). Agnotology a missing term to describe the cultural production of ignorance (and its study). In R. N. Proctor & L. Schiebinger (Eds.), Agnotology the making and unmaking of ignorance (pp. 1–36). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Rappert, B. (2015). Sensing Absence: How to See What Isn’t There in the Study of Science and Security. In B. Rappert & B. Balmer (Eds.), Absence in Science, Security and Policy: From Research Agendas to Global Strategy (pp. 3–33). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar
  31. Rappert, B., & Balmer, B. (2015). Ignorance Is Strength? Intelligence, Security and National Secrets. In M. Gross & L. McGoey (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies (pp. 328–337). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Räsänen, M., & Nyce, J. M. (2013). The Raw Is Cooked: Data in Intelligence Practice. Science, Technology & Human Values, 38(5), 655–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reitano, T., De Lugo, L. B. R.-B., & Jesperson, S. (2018). Militarised Responses to Transnational Organised Crime: The War on Crime. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rochlin, J. (2011). Plan Colombia and the Revolution in Military Affairs: The Demise of the FARC. Review of International Studies, 37(02), 715–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sherman, K. (1949). Strategic intelligence for American world policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, J. O. (2011). Maritime Interdiction in Sri Lanka’s Counterinsurgency. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 22(3), 448–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spinardi, G. (2014). Technical Controversy and Ballistic Missile Defence: Disputing Epistemic Authority in the Development of Hit-to-Kill Technology. Science as Culture, 23(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. U.S. NAVY. (2010). Naval Operations Concept 2010, Implementing the Maritime Strategy. Washington, DC: USM Corps, USC Guard - 2010.Google Scholar
  39. United States Government Accountability Office. (2008). PLAN COLOMBIA Drug Reduction Goals Were Not Fully Met, but Security Has Improved; U.S. Agencies Need More Detailed Plans for Reducing Assistance. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  40. Van Puyvelde, D. (2016). Fusing Drug Enforcement: A Study of the El Paso Intelligence Center. Intelligence and National Security, 31(6), 888–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vellinga, M. (2004). The Political Economy of the Drug Industry: Its Structure and Functioning. In M. Vellinga (Ed.), The Political Economy of the Drug Industry, Latin America and the International System (pp. 3–24). Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  42. Vogel, K. M., Balmer, B., Weiss Evans, S., Kroener, I., Matsumoto, M., & Brian, R. (2016). The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. In U. Felt, R. Fouché, C. A. Miller, & L. Smith-Doerr (Eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (pp. 973–1002). Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Webinfomil. (2003). Lancha de Interdiccion Tipo Orca. Retrieved April 14, 2014, from http://www.webinfomil.com/2011/06/lancha-interceptora-tipo-orca.html
  44. Zaitch, D. (2004). Post-Fordist Cocaine, Labor and Business Relations Among Colombian Dealers. In M. Vellinga (Ed.), The Political Economy of the Drug Industry, Latin America and the International System (pp. 148–174). Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Javier Guerrero C.
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Arts and HumanitiesInstituto Tecnológico MetropolitanoMedellínColombia

Personalised recommendations