Advertisement

Frameworks and Methodologies for Understanding Arts Integration with Culturally Diverse and Struggling Learners

  • A. Helene RobinsonEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

“Disruptive engagement” is a term that means to dare to re-humanize education (Brown, 2015). I hope to inspire “disruptive engagement” by proposing a conceptual framework with applications for research to explore how arts integration can re-humanize education for culturally diverse students. First, I review the literature on academic achievement and arts education across countries and on arts integration with culturally diverse populations. To introduce my theoretical framework, I discuss the relationship between creativity, curiosity, vulnerability, and disruptive engagement. Next, I describe the arts integrated learning contexts and how it aligns to the Universal Design for Learning guidelines (CAST in Universal design for learning proving valuable in advancing education reform nationwide 2009), providing multiple means of representation, action and expression, and engagement. Finally, I explain how these art integrated learning contexts, which provide much recognition, re-humanize education by facilitating positive self-beliefs and resiliency which motivates students to be vulnerable and curious throughout the creative learning process; thus, increasing student behavioral and cognitive engagement leading to school success. In addition, I reflect on my own research that helped to shape the development and refinement of AIEM and discuss limitations.

References

  1. Alabari, M., Harder, A., Jarvis, C., Mogoko, J., & Munoz, M. (2009). The impact of art at Plymouth Youth Center arts and technology. Minneapolis, MN: Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, A. (2012). The influence of process drama on elementary students’ written language. Urban Education, 47(5), 959–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, L. J. (1997). Effects of an integrated reading and music instructional approach on fifth-grade students’ reading achievement, reading attitude, music achievement, and music attitude. Doctoral dissertation, Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 9729987).Google Scholar
  4. Bamford, A. (2009). The wow factor: Global research compendium on the impact of the arts in education. New York: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  6. Barton, G., & Baguley, M. (Eds.) (2017). The Palgrave handbook of global arts education. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.  https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55585-4.Google Scholar
  7. Bassett, D. A. (2010). West African drumming, geography, history, language, multiculturalism and at-risk students in the music classroom. M.S. thesis, Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 1489685).Google Scholar
  8. Baxley, G. B., & Living Stage Theatre Co. (1993). Building resiliency in youth: Imagine the difference. In Proceedings from Imagine the Difference: Building Artistic Partnerships to Save our Children. Washington, DC: Healthcare Services Development Corporation.Google Scholar
  9. Bresler, L. (2002). Out of the trenches: The joys (and risks) of cross-disciplinary collaborations. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 152, 17–39.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, B. (2010). The gifts of imperfection: Let go of who you think you’re supposed to be and embrace who you are. Center City, MN: Hazelden.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, B. (2012). Daring greatly: How the courage to be vulnerable transforms the way we live, love, parent, and lead. New York: Gotham Books.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, B. (2015). Rising Strong: How the ability to reset transforms the way we live, love, parent, and lead. New York: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
  13. CAST. (2009). Universal design for learning proving valuable in advancing education reform nationwide. Retrieved from http://www.cast.org/about/news/2012-05-18.html.
  14. Catterall, J. S. (2009). Doing well and doing good by doing art: The effects of education in the visual and performing arts on the achievements and values of young adults. Los Angeles, CA: Imagination Group/I–Group Books.Google Scholar
  15. Chilcoat, G. (1991). The moving panorama: An approach to teaching American history. Southern Social Studies Journal, 17(1), 17–25.Google Scholar
  16. Cunnington, M., Harnett, S., Reeder, L., & Brown, C. (2010). 21st century skills rubric for students. Long Island, NY: Eastern Suffolk Board of Cooperative Educational Services.Google Scholar
  17. Durham, J. L. (2010). The effects of an art-based and integrated curricular approach on the cognitive process and personal learning characteristics of students with learning disabilities. Doctoral dissertation, Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3405513).Google Scholar
  18. Dwyer, M. C. (2011). Reinvesting in arts education: winning America’s future through creative schools. President’s Committee on the Arts and the Humanities. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED522818.
  19. Eisner, E. (1997). Cognition and representation. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 349–355.Google Scholar
  20. Feilen, K. V. (2009). Arts for my sake: Identities of urban youth in the local “artistic” community. Doctoral dissertation, Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No.3388107).Google Scholar
  21. Feldman, R. (2002). Listening to student voices. Visual Arts Research, 28(1), 68–81.Google Scholar
  22. Folkes-Bryant, B. (2008). Investigating the effect on student attitudes, motivation and self-esteem in performing arts elementary schools incorporating arts integration. Doctoral dissertation, Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3395645).Google Scholar
  23. Gadsden, V. L. (2008). The arts and education: Knowledge generation, pedagogy, and the discourse of learning. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 29–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glass, D., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2013). Universal design for learning and the arts. Harvard Educational Review, 83(1), 98–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grafton, E., Gillespie, B., & Henderson, S. (2010). Resilience: The Power Within. Oncology Nursing Forum, 37(6), 698–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greenfader, C. M., & Brouillette, L. (2013). Boosting language skills of english learners through dramatization and movement. Reading Teacher, 67(3), 171–180.  https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoyt, L. (1992). Many ways of knowing: Using drama, oral interactions, and the visual arts to enhance reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 45(8), 580–584.Google Scholar
  28. Jacobs, M. N. (2005). Drama discovery: The effect of dramatic arts in combination with bibliotherapy on the self-efficacy of students with emotional and/or behavioral disabilities regarding their understanding of their own exceptionalities. Doctoral dissertation, Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3175856).Google Scholar
  29. Jones, S. (2017). ESSA: Mapping opportunities for the arts. Denver: Education Commission of the States. Retrieved from http://www.ecs.org/ec-content/uploads/ESSA_Mapping_the_opportunities_for_the_arts-2.pdf.
  30. Kariuki, P., & Honeycutt, C. (1998). An investigation of the effects of music on two emotionally disturbed students’ writing motivations and writing skills.Google Scholar
  31. Kraus, N., Slater, J., Thompson, E. C., Hornickel, J., Strait, D. L., Nicol, T., et al. (2014). Music enrichment programs improve the neural encoding of speech in at-risk children. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(36), 11913–11918.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1881-14.2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krawitz, J., Achmetli, K., Blum, W., Vogel, S., & Besser, M. (2016). Report on the relative strengths and weaknesses of the United States in PISA 2012 mathematics, OECD Education (Working Papers No. 151). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/bc544d1e-en.
  33. Leseho, J., & Maxwell, L. R. (2010). Coming alive: Creative movement as a personal coping strategy on the path to healing and growth. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 38(1), 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lorimer, M. R. (2011). Arts-infused learning in middle level classrooms. Journal for Learning through the Arts, 7(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Margolis, H., & McCabe, P. (2006, March). Improving self-efficacy and motivation: What to do, what to say. Intervention in School & Clinic, 41(4), 218–227. Retrieved June 3, 2009, from Academic Search Complete database.Google Scholar
  36. Marshall, J. (2014). Transdisciplinarity and art integration: Toward a new understanding of art-based learning across the curriculum. Studies in Art Education, 55(2), 104–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moorefield-Lang, H. M. (2010). Arts voices: Middle school students and the relationships of the arts to their motivation and self-efficacy. The Qualitative Report, 15(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  38. Noguera, P. (2010). A new vision for school reform. Nation, 290(23), 11–14.Google Scholar
  39. O’Connor, S. (2001). After-school programs for early adolescents: A path for building resiliency. School-Age Review, 3, 14–18.Google Scholar
  40. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Executive summary. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Parsad, B., & Spiegelman, M. (2012). Arts education in public elementary and secondary schools: 1999–2000 and 2009–10 (NCES 2012–014). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  42. Pasiali, V. (2012). Resilience, music therapy, and human adaptation: nurturing young children and families. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 21(1), 36–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ponder, C., & Kissinger, L. (2009). Shaken and stirred: A pilot project in arts and special education. Teaching Artist Journal, 7(1), 40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Prager, J. J. (2006). Through the eyes of art: Uncovering promising practices in arts-themed learning in California charter elementary schools. Doctoral dissertation, Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3257672).Google Scholar
  45. Prescott, M. V., Sekendur, B., Bailey, B., & Hoshino, J. (2008). Art making as a component and facilitator of resiliency with homeless youth. Art Therapy, 25(4), 156–163.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2008.10129549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Robinson, A. H. (2012). Using creativity and collaboration to develop innovative programs that embrace diversity in higher education. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 5, 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Robinson, A. H. (2013). Arts integration and the success of disadvantaged students: a research evaluation. Arts Education Policy Review, 114(4), 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Robinson, A. H. (2017). Voices from diverse freshman students: How arts integration impacted their learning. Journal for Learning through the Arts, 13(1). Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.21977/D913125528.
  49. Robinson, A. H. (2018a). Arts integration and the power of vulnerability: Exploring the relationship between pre-service teachers’ gains in course content and skills, 21st century skills, engagement, dispositions, self-beliefs and resiliency (Manuscript in preparation).Google Scholar
  50. Robinson, A. H. (2018b). Exploring the impact of arts integration on the reading, writing, and 21st century skill gains of young, marginalized learners using the AIEM framework (Manuscript in preparation).Google Scholar
  51. Robinson, A. H., & Byrd, M. (2016). Project EAGLE evaluation report. Sarasota, FL: USFSM PAInT Center.Google Scholar
  52. Rogers, C. (2012, September). Engineering in kindergarten: How schools are changing. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 13(4), 4–9.Google Scholar
  53. Russell-Bowie, D. (2013). Wombat stew: Enhancing self-concept through an integrated arts project. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 14(17), 1–12. Retrieved from http://www.ijea.org/v14n17/.
  54. Schmidt, W. H., & Burroughs, N. A. (2015). Puzzling out PISA: what can international comparisons tell us about American education? American Educator, 1, 24–31.Google Scholar
  55. Scriven, T. V. (2008). The short-term qualitative impact of an interdisciplinary arts-centered curriculum on rural, at-risk middle school students. Doctoral dissertation, Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3321525).Google Scholar
  56. Skinner, E., Marchand, G., Furrer, C., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Silverstein, L. B., & Layne, S. (2010). What is arts integration? Retrieved from http://www.ocde.us/CommonCoreCA/Documents/Arts_and_CCSS_reportsharedatAsilomar2012.pdf.
  59. Smith, K., & McKnight, K. S. (2009). Remembering to laugh and explore: Improvisational activities for literacy teaching in urban classrooms. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 10(12), 1–21.Google Scholar
  60. Stevenson, L. M., & Deasy, R. J. (2005). Third space: When learning matters. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.Google Scholar
  61. Thomas, N. (2012). Love, rights and solidarity: Studying children’s participation using Honneth’s theory of recognition. Childhood: A Global Journal of Child Research, 19(4), 453–466.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568211434604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Turpin, M. J. (2008). Redefining failure: Phenomenology and meaning. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 55(4), 283–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2010). Survey and results on the implementation of the road map. Accessed at http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/creativity/arts-education/official-texts/road-map/surveyand-results-on-the-implementation-of-the-road-map.
  64. Werner, L. R. (2001). Using dance to teach math: The effects of a co-teaching arts integration model on teacher practice and student learning. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3020617).Google Scholar
  65. Wilhelm, J. D. (1995). Reading is seeing: Using visual response to improve the literary reading of reluctant readers. Journal of Reading Behavior 27(4): 467–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wolf, S. (1998). The flight of reading: Shifts in instruction, orchestration, and attitudes in through classroom theatre. Reading Research Quarterly, 33(4), 382–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of South Florida Sarasota-ManateeSarasotaUSA

Personalised recommendations