Advertisement

Introduction: Finding Evidences of Artistic Thinking in the Schools

  • Pamela Costes-OnishiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Scholarship claimed that the arts bear affordances in nurturing skills, dispositions and competencies that are increasingly needed in the education for the future. However, the evidences remain to be inconclusive. This chapter presents the main arguments and intentions forwarded in this book. It outlines how the chapters address current research and approaches to the arts in education that provide strong empirical evidences in establishing the claim that the arts indeed nurture future-oriented thinking skills and habits of mind. The intention is not necessarily to offer cause–effect links to address this gap in the current literature, but more importantly, to chart how research in arts/in/education responds to global needs through ground-based evidences using different methodological and pedagogical approaches that are rooted in a breadth of contexts: cultures, teaching and learning environments, disciplinary and interdisciplinary, student levels and student abilities.

References

  1. Acedo, C., & Hughes, C. (2014). Principles for learning and competences in the 21st-century curriculum. Prospects, 44, 503–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arts and Culture Strategic Review (ACSR). (2012). The report of the arts and culture strategic review. Retrieved October 8, 2018, from, https://www.nac.gov.sg/dam/jcr:1b1765f3-ff95-48f0-bbf9-f98288eb7082.
  3. Bamford, A. (2006). The wow factor: Global research compendium on the impact of the arts in education. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  4. Bresler, L. (2007). Introduction. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education (pp. xvii–xvix). The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Choo, S. S. (2018). Approaching twenty-first century education from a cosmopolitan perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(2), 162–181.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2017.1313316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Comunian, R., & Ooi, C.-S. (2016). Global aspirations and local talent: The development of creative higher education in Singapore. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 22(1), 58–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costes-Onishi, P. (2016). Negotiating the boundaries between the formal and the informal: An experienced teacher’s reflective adaptations of informal learning in a keyboard class for at-risk students. British Journal of Music Education, 33(3), 309–326.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051716000140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Curdt-Christiansen, X. L., & Silver, R. E. (2012). Educational reforms, cultural clashes and classroom practices. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(2), 141–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Deng, Z., & Gopinathan, S. (2016). PISA and high-performing education systems: Explaining Singapore’s education success. Comparative Education.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2016.1219535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. European Commission. (2018). Key competences. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/school/competences_en.
  13. Folkestad, G. (2006). Formal and informal learning situations or practices vs formal and informal ways of learning. British Journal of Music Education, 23(2), 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
  15. Gadsden, V. L. (2008). The arts and education: Knowledge generation, pedagogy, and the discourse of learning. Review of Research in Education, 32, 29–61.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gardner, H. (2008). Five minds for the future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goh, J. W. P., & Tan, C. H. P. (2009). Policy and evidence of marketisation of education in Singapore schools. The New Educational Review, 236–246.Google Scholar
  18. Green, L. (2008). Music, informal learning and the school: A new classroom pedagogy. Great Britain: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  19. Griffin, P., McGraw, B., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Hallam, S., Creech, A., & McQueen, H. (2018). Pupils’ perceptions of informal learning in school music lessons. Music Education Research, 20(2), 213–230.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2016.1249358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heng, S. K. (2015). Keynote Address by Mr Heng Swee Keat, Minister for Education, at the Ministry of Education Work Plan Seminar 2015, on Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 9:15 am at Ngee Ann Polytechnic Convention Centre. Retrieved October 8, 2018, from https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/speeches/keynote-address-by-mr-heng-swee-keat–minister-for-education–at-the-ministry-of-education-work-plan-seminar-2015–on-tuesday–22-september-2015-at-9-15am-at-ngee-ann-polytechnic-convention-centre.
  22. Hentschke, L. (2013). Global policies and local needs of music education in Brazil. Arts Education Policy Review, 114, 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. (2013). Studio thinking 2: The real benefits of visual arts education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press; Reston, VA: NAEA, National Art Education Association.Google Scholar
  24. Jaffurs, S. E. (2004). The impact of informal music learning practices in the classroom, or how I learned how to teach from a garage band. International Journal of Music Education, 22(3), 189–200.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761404047401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jagušt, T., Botički, I., & So, H.-J. (2018). A review of research on bridging the gap between formal and informal learning with technology in primary school contexts. Journal of Computed Assisted Learning, 34, 417–428.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson, S. M., Marietta, G., Higgins, M. C., Mapp, K. L., & Grossman, A. (2015). Achieving coherence in district improvement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kadir, M. A. A. (2017). Engendering a culture of thinking in a culture of performativity: The challenge of mediating tensions in the Singaporean educational system. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47(2), 227–246.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1148115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li, X., Kenzy, P., Underwood, L., & Severson, L. (2015). Dramatic impact of action research of arts-based teaching on at-risk students. Educational Action Research, 23(4), 567–580.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1042983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lichtzier, R., & Peters, P. (2017). Illuminating artistic processes toward transdisciplinary discourse. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11(522), 1–3.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Logsdon, L. F. (2013). Questioning the role of “21st-century skills” in arts education advocacy discourse. Music Educator’s Journal, 51–56.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432113499936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Long, S. D. (2015). The arts in and out of school: Educational policy, provision and practice in Ireland today. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(2), 267–286.Google Scholar
  32. Maarschalk, J. A. N. (1988). Scientific literacy and informal science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660250205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marshall, J. (2014). Transdisciplinarity and art integration: Toward a new understanding of art-based learning across the curriculum. Studies in Art Education, 55(2), 104–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2009). Report of the primary education review and implementation committee. Singapore: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  35. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2018). Applied learning. Retrieved October 8, 2018, from https://www.moe.gov.sg/education/secondary/applied-learning.
  36. Moyer, L., Klopfer, M., & Ernst, J. V. (2018). Bridging the arts and computer science: Engaging at-risk students through the integration of music. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 77(6), 8–12.Google Scholar
  37. National Center on Education and the Economy (NCEE). (2012). The new commission on the skills of the American workforce. Retrieved from http://www.skillscommission.org/.
  38. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010). The OECD innovation strategy: Getting a head start on tomorrow. Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264083479-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011). Towards an OECD skills strategy. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the survey of adult skills. Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264204256-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2017). OECD skills outlook 2017: Skills and global value chains. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264273351-en.
  42. Partnership for 21st Century Learning (P21). (2007). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_framework_0816.pdf.
  43. Renaissance City Plan I (RCP I). (2000). Renaissance city report: Culture and the arts in Renaissance Singapore. Retrieved October 8, 2018. From https://www.nac.gov.sg/dam/jcr:defaf681-9bbb-424d-8c77-879093140750.
  44. Renaissance City Plan III (RCP III). (2008). Renaissance City Plan III. Retrieved October 8, 2018, from https://www.nac.gov.sg/dam/jcr:18cf2883-7907-4938-9931-384333e210ce.
  45. Robinson, A. H. (2013). Arts integration and the success of disadvantaged students: A research evaluation. Arts Education Policy Review, 114(4), 191–204.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2013.826050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rodriguez, C. X. (2009). Informal learning in music: Emerging roles of teachers and students. Action, Criticism & Theory for Music Education, 8(2), 36–45.Google Scholar
  47. Schleicher, A. (Ed.). (2012). Preparing teachers and developing leaders for the 21st Century: Lesson from around the world. Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/23127090.
  48. Schleicher, A. (Ed.). (2014). Equity, excellence and inclusiveness in education: Policy lessons from around the world. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264214033-en.
  49. Schuler, S. C. (2011). Music education for life: The three artistic processes—Paths to lifelong 21st-century skills through music. Music Educator’s Journal, 97(9), 8–13.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432111409828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scott, C. L. (2015). The futures of learning 3: What kind of pedagogies for the 21st century? (ERF Working Papers Series, No. 15). Paris: UNESCO Education Research and Foresight.Google Scholar
  51. Sefton‐Green, J. (2004). Literature review in informal learning with technology outside school. Performing Arts, 7(7), 1–23. http://doi.org/citeulikearticle-id:260146.
  52. Sharpe, L., & Gopinathan, S. (2002). After effectiveness: New directions in the Singapore school system? Journal of Education Policy, 17(2), 151–166.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930110116507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sirayi, M., & Nawa, L. L. (2014). Cultural policy and arts management curriculum in South Africa’s education system: Lessons for good governance. South African Journal of Higher Education, 28(5), 1643–1662.Google Scholar
  54. Tišliar, P. (2017). The development of informal learning and museum pedagogy in museums. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(3), 586–592.  https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2017.3.586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vitale, J. L. (2011). Formal and informal music learning: Attitudes and perspectives of secondary school non-music teachers. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(5), 1–14.Google Scholar
  56. Werquim, P. (2010). Recognising non‐formal and informal learning: Outcomes, policies and practices. Paris, France: OECD publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264063853-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Winner, E., Goldstein, T. R., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2013). Art for art’s sake?: The impact of arts education. Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  58. Wong, T.-H., & Apple, M. (2002). Rethinking the education/state formation connection: pedagogic reform in Singapore, 1945–1965. Comparative Education Review, 46(2), 182–210.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations