Stories that Memorabilia Tell in Mother–Daughter Exchanges

  • Anne KearyEmail author
  • Julie Faulkner


This chapter focuses on memorabilia that pass among mothers and daughters. Luce Irigaray, a French psychoanalyst, suggests that small handmade objects be interposed between mothers and daughters to create a personal spatial identity. This elusive feminine space was uncovered in this study when women and girls were asked about objects and material items that had been handed down to them through the maternal line. Anne, the co-author, has a wooden carving from Oberammergau, Germany of St. Anne and her daughter Mary that had passed through her maternal line. It is a symbol, a sign of her female forebears creating a spiritual and material space for the mother–daughter relationship. By foregrounding stories about memorabilia, it is suggested that the multiple dimensions of women’s lives come into view. Such stories affirm female subjectivity within the boundaries of social, cultural, familial and religious discourses. In this study, these objects served as mnemonic devices for generating and provoking mother–daughter stories. This chapter unpacks some of the meanings given to these memorabilia.



Photos are reprinted with the permission of the author, Anne Keary.


  1. Aggar, B. (1992). Cultural studies as critical theory. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barlett, A., & Henderson, M. (2016). What is a feminist object? Feminist material culture and the making of the activist object. Journal of Australian Studies, 40(2), 156–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Csikszentmahalyi, M., & Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Doecke, B., & Hayes, T. (1999). Good dreams/bad dreams: Text selection and censorship in Australia. Paper presented at the Biennial conference of the International Federation for the Teaching of English, Warwick Englan. Found at:
  5. Duggan, J.-A., & Gandolfo, E. (2011). Other spaces: Migration, objects and archives. Modern Italy, 16(3), 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 223–237). London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  7. Hoggart, R. (1957). The uses of literacy: Aspects of working-class life with special reference to publications and entertainment. Hammondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  8. Irigaray, L. (1993). Je, tu, nous: Towards a culture of difference (A. Martin, Trans.). New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Keary, A. (2011). Catholic girls: The mother-daughter nexus. Gender and Education, 23(6), 695–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lim, S. (1996). Among the white moonfaces: Memoirs of a nyonya feminist. Singapore: Times Books International.Google Scholar
  11. Modjeska, D. (1990). Poppy. Ringwood: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Perec, G. (1965). Les Choses: Une histoire des années soixante. Paris: Julliard.Google Scholar
  13. Puri, A., & Thomson, A. (2017). Australian lives: An intimate history. Clayton, Victoria: Monash University Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Sumrall, A. C., & Vecchione, P. (1992). Catholic girls. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
  15. Valentine, G., Skelton, T., & Chambers, D. (1998). Cool places: An introduction to youth and youth cultures. In T. Skelton, & G. Valentine (Eds.), Cool places: Geographies of youth cultures (pp. 1–27). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Williams, R. (2003). Television: Technology and cultural form. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Willis, P. (1990). Common culture. Birmingham: Open University.Google Scholar
  18. Williams, R., & Williams, R. H. (1977). Marxism and literature (Vol. 392). Oxford Paperbacks.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations