Advertisement

Good and Bad Knappers Among Neanderthals

  • Javier BaenaEmail author
  • Irene Ortiz
  • Concepción Torres
Chapter
Part of the Replacement of Neanderthals by Modern Humans Series book series (RNMH)

Abstract

One of most recent Mousterian sites discovered in Madrid (Spain) is El Cañaveral-Area 3 archaeological site, an open-air raw material quarrying site occupied during the MIS 3. In this site, we have excavated a total surface area of around 164 m2 of coluvionar sediments affected by edaphic processes that have had an impact on the distribution of the original knapping zones. However, several refits were discovered as a result of rapid sedimentation. From a technological point of view, the lithic production was mainly focused in the production of levallois points after a centripetal decortication of flakes and blocks. In this paper, we present and analyze some examples that indicate, with no doubt, the existence of a wide variety of technological levels in the knapping authors, as a possible result of social changes that occurred in the MIS 3 Neanderthals communities.

Keywords

Lithic technology Skills Learning Acheulian Palaeolithic 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This contribution is a part of the research projects with references HAR2013-48784-C3-3-P and HAR2016-76760-C3-2-P, financed by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of Spain. The authors would also like to thank ARQUEX SL., Junta de compensación of El Cañaveral, the Cañaveral archaeological team and particularly I. Rus and S. Bárez.

References

  1. Amick SD (2007) Investigating the behavioral causes and archaeological effects of lithic recycling. In: McPherron SP (ed) Tools versus cores: alternative approaches to stone tool analysis. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. Assaf E, Barkai R, Gopher A (2015) Knowledge transmission and apprentice flint-knappers in the Acheulo-Yabrudian: A case study from Qesem Cave, Israel. Quat Int 398: 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.02.028
  3. Baena Preysler J, Cuartero F (2006) Más allá de la tipología lítica: lectura diacrítica y experimentación como claves para la reconstrucción del proceso tecnológico. Zona Arqueológica 7:145–160. http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2259131Google Scholar
  4. Baena Preysler J, Polo J, Bárez S, Cuartero F, Roca M, Lázaro A, Márquez R (2008) Tecnología musteriense en la región madrileña: un discurso enfrentado entre valles y páramos de la Meseta sur. Treballs d’Arqueologia 14:249–278Google Scholar
  5. Baena Preysler J, Bárez S, Pérez-González A, Roca M, Lázaro A, Márquez R, Escobar A (2011) Searchers and miners: first signs of Flint exploitation in Madrid’s region. In: Capote M, Consuegra S, Díaz del Río P, Terradas X (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd international conference of the UISPP commission on Flint Miningin pre- and protohistoric times (Madrid, 14–17 October 2009), BAR International Series 2260. Archeopress, Oxford, pp 203–220Google Scholar
  6. Baena Preysler J, Ortiz Nieto-Márquez I, Torres Navas C, Bárez Cueto S (2014) Recycling in abundance: re-use and recycling processes in the Lower and Middle Paleolithic contexts of the Central Iberian Peninsula. Quat Int 361:142–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bamforth DB, Finlay N (2008) Introduction: archaeological approaches to lithic production skill and craft learning. J Archaeol Method Theory 15(1):1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-007-9043-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bárez S, Pérez-González A (2007) Patrones de aprovechamiento minero prehistórico del Sílex de Casa Montero. In: Lario J, Silva P (eds) XII Reunión Nacional de Cuaternario. AEQUA, Ávila, pp 91–92Google Scholar
  9. Barkai R, Gopher A (2013) Cultural and biological transformations in the middle Pleistocene Levant: a view from Qesem cave, Israel. In: Akazawa T, Nishiaki Y, Aoki K (eds) Dynamics of learning in Neanderthals and modern humans. Volume 1 cultural perspectives. Springer, Tokyo, pp 115–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barkai R, Gopher A, Shimelmitz R (2005) Middle Pleistocene blade production in the Levant: an Amudian assemblage from Qesem cave, Israel. Eurasian Prehistory 3(2):39–74Google Scholar
  11. Barkai R, Lemorini C, Shimelmitz R, Lev Z, Stiner MC, Gopher A (2009) A blade for all seasons? Making and using Amudian blades at Qesem cave, Israel. Hum Evol 24(1):57–75. http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=21275053Google Scholar
  12. Bar-Yosef O, Van Peer P (2009) The Chaîne Opératoire approach in middle Paleolithic archaeology. Curr Anthropol 50(1):103–131.  https://doi.org/10.1086/592234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bodu P, Karlin C, Ploux S (1990) Who’s who? The Magdalenian flintknappers of Pincevent, France. In: Cziesla E, Eickhoff S, Arts N, Winter D (eds) The big puzzle: international symposium on refitting stone artifacts, Monrepos, 1987. Holos Verlag, Bonn, pp 143–163Google Scholar
  14. Boëda E (1988a) Le concept laminaire : rupture et filiation avec le concept Levallois. In: Otte M (ed) L’Homme de Néandertal. Vol. 8, La Mutation, ERAUL 35. Université de Liège, Liège, pp 41–59Google Scholar
  15. Boëda E (1988b) Le concept Levallois et evaluation de son champ d’application. In: Otte M (ed) L’Homme de Néandertal. Vol. 4 La Technique, ERAUL 31. Université de Liège, Liège, pp 13–26Google Scholar
  16. Boëda E (1990) De la surface au volume: analyse des conceptions des debitages Levallois et laminaire. In: Farizy C (ed) Paléolithique Moyen Recent et Paléolithique Superieur Ancien en Europe. Actes du Colloque International de Nemours.1988, Memoires du Musée de Préhistorie d’Île-de-France 3. Musée de Préhistorie d’Île-de-France, Nemours, pp 63–68Google Scholar
  17. Boëda E (1993) Le débitage discoïde et le débitage Levallois récurrent centripède. Bull Soc Préhist Franç 90(6):392–404.  https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1993.9669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bordes F (1980) Le débitage Levallois et ses variantes. B Bull Soc Préhist Franç 77:45–49.  https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1980.5242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bourguignon L, Faivre JP, Turq A (2004) Ramification des chaînes opératoires: Une spécificité du moustérien? Paléo 16:37–48. http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=16660637Google Scholar
  20. Bourguignon L, Blaser F, Rios J, Pradet LFS, Guibert P (2008) L’occupation moustérienne de la Doline de Cantalouette II (Creysse, Dordogne): spécificités technologiques et économiques, premiers résultats d’une analyse intégrée. Mém Soc Préhistorique Fr 47:133–150Google Scholar
  21. Brenet M, Folgado M, Bertran P, Claud E. Vigier S, La Haye C (2008) Étude interdisciplinaire des niveaux paléolithiques de Combe Brune 2. INRAP, DordogneGoogle Scholar
  22. Brenet M, Bourguignon L, Folgado M, Ortega I (2011) Elaboración de un protocolo de experimentación lítica para la comprensión de los comportamientos técnicos y tecno-económicos durante el Paleolítico Medio. In: Morgabo PA, Baena J, Gonzalez DG (eds) La Investigación Experimental Aplicada a La Arqueología. Departamento de Prehistoria y Arqueologia, Universidad de Granada, Granada, pp 77–85Google Scholar
  23. Brenet M, Folgado M, Bourguignon L (2013) Des Industries du Paléolithique Mouen. Compétence des expérimentateurs. In: Experimentación en arqueología. Estudio y difusión del pasado. Sèrie Monogràfica del MAC 25, Museu d’Arqueologia de Catalunya, Girona, pp 177–182Google Scholar
  24. Calvo JP, Alonso Zarza AM, García del Cura MA, Ordóñez S, Rodriquez-Aranda JP, Sanz Montero ME (1996) Sedimentary evolution of lake systems through the Miocene of Madrid Basin. In: Friend PFDabrio JC (ed) Paleoclimatic and paleohydrological constraint. Tertiary Basins of Spain: the stratigraphic record of crustal kinematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 272–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Close AE (1996) Carry that weight: the use and transportation of stone tools. Curr Anthropol 37:545–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Crassard R, Hilbert YH (2013) A Nubian complex site from Central Arabia: implications for Levallois taxonomy and human dispersals during the Upper Pleistocene. PLoS One 8(7):e69221.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Crassard R, Thiébaut C (2011) Levallois points production from eastern Yemen and some comparisons with assemblages from East-Africa, Europe and the Levant. In: ERAUL 999, Université de Liège, Liège, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  28. Delagnes A (1990) Analyse technologique de la méthode de débitage de l’abri Suard (La Chaise-de-Vouthon, Charente). Paléo 2(1):81–88.  https://doi.org/10.3406/pal.1990.989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Delagnes A, Rendu W (2011) Shifts in Neandertal mobility, technology and subsistence strategies in western France. J Archeol Sci 38(8):1771–1783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Díez MF (2000) El poblamiento paleolítico en los páramos del Duero. Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid. http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=170491Google Scholar
  31. Ekshtain R, Barzilai O, Inbar M (2011) Givat Rabi East, a new middle Palaeolithic knapping site in the lower Galilee (Israel). Paléorient 37(2):107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eren MI, Lycett SJ (2012) Why Levallois? A morphometric comparison of experimental “preferential” Levallois flakes versus debitage flakes. PLoS One 7(1):e29273.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eren MI, Bradley BA, Sampson CG (2011) Middle Paleolithic skill level and the individual knapper: an experiment. Am Antiq 76(2):229–251.  https://doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.76.2.229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fischer A (1990) On being a pupil of a flintknapper of 11,000 years ago.pdf. In: Cziesla E (ed) The Big Puzzle: International Symposium on Refitting Stone Artefacts, Holos, Monrepos, pp 447–464Google Scholar
  35. Fischer A, Mortensen MF, Henriksen PS, Mathiassen DR, Olsen J (2013) Dating the Trollesgave site and the Bromme culture – chronological fix-points for the Lateglacial settlement of southern Scandinavia. J Archaeol Sci 40(12):4663–4674.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.06.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Frouin M, Lahaye C, Hernandez M, Mercier N, Guibert P, Brene M, Bertran P (2014) Chronology of the middle Palaeolithic open-air site of Combe Brune 2 (Dordogne, France): a multi luminescence dating approach. J Archaeol Sci 52:524–534.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.09.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Galup SM (2007) Postclassic Maya lithic tool maintenance, recycling, and consumption patterns at Laguna de on island. (Occasional. Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, Department of Anthropology, University of Albany, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  38. Geneste JM (1985) Analyse lithique d’industries moustériennes du Périgord: une approche technologique du comportement des groupes humains au Paléolithique moyen. Université de Bordeaux I, BordeauxGoogle Scholar
  39. Geneste JM (1988) Systèmes d’approvisionnement en matières premieres au Paléolithique moyen et au Paléolithique supérieur en Aquitaine. In: Kozlowski JK (ed) L’Homme de Néandertal. Vol. 8, La Mutation, ERAUL 35. Université de Liège, Liège, pp 61–70Google Scholar
  40. Geribàs N, Mosquera M, Vergès JM (2010) What novice knappers have to learn to become expert stone toolmakers. J Archaeol Sci 37(11):2857–2870.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2010.06.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gopher A, Barkai R (2011) Sitting on the tailing piles: creating extraction landscapes in Middle Pleistocene quarry complexes in the Levant. World Archaeol 43(2):211–229.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2011.579484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gopher A, Barkai R (2013) Middle Paleolithic open-air industrial areas in the Galilee, Israel: the challenging study of flint extraction and reduction complexes. Quat Int 331(8):95–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2013.08.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Grimaldi S (1998) Analyse technologique, chaîne opératoire et objectifs techniques. Torre in Pietra (Rome, Italie). Torre in Pietra (Rome, Italy). Technological analysis, chaîne opératoire and technical objectives. Paléo 10(1):109–122.  https://doi.org/10.3406/pal.1998.1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Grimm L (2000) Apprentice flintknapping. Relating material culture and social practice in the Upper Paleolithic. In: Derevenski JS (ed) Children and material culture. Routledg, London, pp 53–71Google Scholar
  45. Guette C (2002) Révision critique du concept de débitage Levallois à travers l’étude du gisement moustérien de Saint-Vaast-la-Hougue/le Fort (chantiers I-III et II, niveaux inférieurs) (Manche, France). Bull Soc Préhist Fr 99(2):237–248.  https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.2002.12655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hiscock P (2009) Reduction, recycling, and raw material procurement in Western Arnhem Land, Australia. In: Adam B, Blades BS (eds) Lithic materials and Paleolithic societies. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 78–93.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444311976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Holmes JA, Atkinsonb T, Darbyshirec DPF, Horned DJ, Joordensf J, Robertsg MB, Sinka KJ, Whittakeri JE (2010) Middle Pleistocene climate and hydrological environment at the Boxgrove hominin site (West Sussex, UK) from ostracod records. Quat Sci Rev 29(13–14):1515–1527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hovers E (2012) Invention, reinvention and innovation: the makings of Oldowan lithic technology. In: Elias S (ed) Origins of human innovation and creativity. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 51–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Inizan ML, Reduron-Ballinger M, Roche H, Tixier J (1999) Technology and terminology of knapped stone, Préhistoire de la Pierre Taillée. CNRS. CREP, NanterreGoogle Scholar
  50. Jaubert J, Hublin JJ, McPherron SJP, Soressie M, Claud E, Rendu W, Richards MP, Thiébaut C (2008) Chez-Pinaud Jonzac (Charente Maritime). Rapport de Fouille ProgramméeGoogle Scholar
  51. Kelly RL (1988) The three sides of a biface. Am Antiq 53:717–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. López Recio M, Baena J (2001) Captación de recursos líticos durante el Paleolítico Medio en la comarca de la Mancha Toledana: El Cerro del Molino de San Cristóbal (Camuñas). In: Congreso de Arqueología de La Provincia de Toledo (ed) II Congreso de Arqueología de La Provincia de Toledo. La Mancha Occidental Y La Mesa de Ocaña. Diputacion Provincial de Toledo, Toledo, pp 11–18Google Scholar
  53. Machado J, Hernández CM, Galván B (2011) Contribución teórico-metodológicaal análisis histórico de palimpsestos arqueológicos a partir de la producciónlítica. Un ejemplo de aplicación para el Paleolítico medio en el yacimiento de ElSalt (Alcoy, Alicante). Recerques Museu Alcoi 20:33–46Google Scholar
  54. Malinsky-Buller A, Ekshtain R, Hovers E (2013) Organization of Lithic Technology at ‘Ein Qashish, a Late Middle Paleolithic open-air site in Israel. Quat Int 331(8):234–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2013.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mangado J (2006) El aprovisionamiento en materias primas líticas: hacia una caracterización paleocultural de los comportamientos paleoeconómicos. Trab Prehist 63(2):79–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Meignen L (2000) Early middle Palaeolithic blade technology in southwestern Asia. Acta Anthropol Sin 19:58–168Google Scholar
  57. Meignen L, Costamagno S, Beauval C, Bourguignon L, Vandermeersch B, Maureille B (2007) Gestion des ressources lithiques au paleolithique moyen dans une halte de chasse specialisse sur le Renne: Les Pradelles (Marillac-Le-Franc, Charente). In: Moncel MH, Moigne AM, Arzarello M, Peretto C (eds) Aires d’approvisionnement en matieres premieres et aires d’approvisionnement en ressources alimentaires/ raw material supply areas and food supply area, BAR International Series 1725. Archeopress, Oxford, pp 127–139Google Scholar
  58. Meignen L, Delagnes A, Bourguignon L (2009) Patterns of lithic material procurement and transformation during the Middle Paleolithic in Western Europe. In: Adams B, Blades BS (eds) Lithic materials and Paleolithic societies. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp 15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mercier N, Valladas H, Falgueres C, Shao Q, Gopher A, Barkai R, Bahain JJ, Vialettes L, Joron JL, Reyss JL (2013) New datings of Amudian layers at Qesem cave (Israel): results of TL applied to burnt flints and ESR/U-series to teeth. J Archaeol Sci 40(7):3011–3020.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Montes Ramírez L (1988) El Musteriense de la cuenca del Ebro. Universidad de Zaragoza. http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=178949
  61. Nakahashi W (2014) The effect of cultural interaction on cumulative cultural evolution. J Theor Biol 352:6–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.02.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Niven L, Steele TE, Rendu W, Mallye JB, McPherron SP, Soressi M, Jaubert J, Hublin JJ, Niven L, Steele TE, Rendu W, Mallye J-B, McPherron SP, Soressi M, Jaubert J, Hublin J-J (2012) Neandertal mobility and large-game hunting: the exploitation of reindeer during the Quina Mousterian at Chez-Pinaud Jonzac (Charente-Maritime, France). J Hum Evol 4:624–635.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.07.002
  63. Nonaka T, Bril B, Rein R (2010) How do stone knappers predict and control the outcome of flaking? Implications for understanding early stone tool technology. J Hum Evol 59(2):155–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ortiz Nieto-Márquez I (2013) Dinámicas de la industria lítica. Análisis Espacial de los agregados del Área 3 en el yacimiento de El Cañaveral (Coslada – Madrid). Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, MadridGoogle Scholar
  65. Pérez-González A (1994) La depresión del Tajo. In: Gutiérrez Elorza M (ed) Geomorfología de España, Rueda, p 389–436Google Scholar
  66. Perreve V, Moncel MH (1999) Un atelier de taille moustérien: Le Clos du Charnier Lagorce (Ardèche, France): Quelques remarques sur les modes de débitage. A Mousterian debitage workshop: Le Clos du Charnier at Lagorce (Ardèche, France): Some remarks on the debitage mode. Anthropologie 103(3):471–484Google Scholar
  67. Pigeot N (1991) Réflexions sur l’histoire technique de l’Homme: de l’évolution cognitive à l’évolution culturelle. Paléo 3(1):167–200.  https://doi.org/10.3406/pal.1991.1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ploux S (1991) Technologie, technicité, techniciens: méthode de détermination d’auteurs et comportements techniques individuels. In: APDCA (ed) 25 ans d’études technologiques en préhistoire : bilan et perspectives. Actes des XIe Rencontres internationales d’archéologie et d’histoire d’Antibes, 18–20 octobre 1990. APDCA, Juan-les-Pins, pp 201–214Google Scholar
  69. Rezek Z, Lin S, Iovita R, Dibble HL (2011) The relative effects of core surface morphology on flake shape and other attributes. J Archaeol Sci 38(6):1346–1359.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.01.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Roebroeks JWM (1988) From finds scatters to early hominid behaviour & a study of Middle Palaeolithic riverside settlements at Maastricht-belvedere (The Netherlands). Analecta praehistonica Leidesia 21. Institute of Prehistory, Leiden University, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  71. Sanguino González J, Gómez de la Laguna AJ, Jiménez Manzanares A, Martín Blanco P (1994) Identificación de cadenas operativas líticas en el sitio arqueológico de “Casa de la Mina II” (Argamasilla de Alba, C. Real) Consideraciones acerca de los yaciminetos superficiales sin contexto estratigráfico. Zephyrus: Rev Prehist Y Arqueol 47:15–40Google Scholar
  72. Santonja M (1986) Valgrande (Puebla de Yeltes, Salamanca): Área de talla y sitio de ocupación del Paleolítico Medio. In: Junta de Castilla y León (ed) Numantia. Arqueologia en Castilla y León, Número 2. Junta de Castilla y León, Castilla, pp 35–85Google Scholar
  73. Shea JJ (2006) The origins of lithic projectile point technology: evidence from Africa, the Levant, and Europe. J Archaeol Sci 33(6):823–846.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2005.10.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shimelmitz RON, Kuhn SL (2013) Early Mousterian Levallois Technology in Unit IX of Tabun cave. PaleoAnthropology 2013:1–27.  https://doi.org/10.4207/PA.2013.ART77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Slimak L, Bressy C, Guendon JL, Montoya C, Ollivier V, Renault S (2005) Exploitation paléolithique de silex oligocènes en Haute Provence (France). Caractérisation des matières premières et processus d’acquisition. C R Palevol 4(4):359–367.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2005.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stapert D (2007) Neanderthal children and their flint. PalArch’s. J Archaeol Northwest Eur 1(2):16–40Google Scholar
  77. Stout D, Chaminade T (2007) The evolutionary neuroscience of tool making. Neuropsychologia 45(5):1091–1100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.09.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stout D, Apel J, Commander J, Roberts M (2014) Late Acheulean technology and cognition at Boxgrove, UK. J Archaeol Sci 41:576–590.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.001
  79. Takakura J (2013) Using lithic refitting to investigate the skill learning process: lessons from upper Paleolithic assemblages at the shirataki sites in Hokkaido, Northern Japan. In: Akazawa T, Nishiaki Y, Aoki K (eds) Dynamics of learning in Neanderthals and modern humans volume 1 cultural perspectives. Springer, Tokyo, pp 151–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tehrani JJ, Riede F (2008) Towards an archaeology of pedagogy: learning, teaching and the generation of material culture traditions. World Archaeol 40(3):316–331.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240802261267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Thiébaut C, Mourre V, Turq A (2009) Diversité des matériaux et diversité des schémas de production au sein de l’industrie moustérienne de la couche K des Fieux (Miers, Lot). Bull Soc Préhist Fr 106(2):239–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Turq A, Roebroeks W, Bourguignon L, Faivre JP (2013) The fragmented character of Middle Palaeolithic stone tool technology. J Hum Evol 65(5):641–655. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248413001899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Usik VI, Rose JI, Hilbert YH, Van Peer P, Marks AE (2013) Nubian complex reduction strategies in Dhofar, southern Oman. Quat Int 300:244–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2012.08.2111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Utrilla Miranda MP, Tilo Adrián MA (2001) Cabezo Marañán (Castelserás): un lugar de explotación del sílex durante el Paleolítico Medio. Kalathos: Rev Seminario Arqueol Etnología Turolense 20:85–99Google Scholar
  85. Vallin L, Masson B, Caspar JP (2001) Taphonomy at Hermies, France: a Mousterian knapping site in a Loessic context. J F Archaeol 28(3/4):419–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Van Kolfschoten T, Roebroeks W, Vandenberghe J (1993) The middle and Late Pleistocene sedimentary and climatic sequence at Maastricht-Belvédère: the type locality of the Belvédère interglacial. Meded Rijks Geol Dienst 47:81–91Google Scholar
  87. Vaquero M, Bargalló A, Chacón MG, Romagnoli F, Sañudo P (2015) Lithic recycling in a middle Paleolithic expedient context: evidence from the Abric Romaní (Capellades, Spain). Quat Int 361:212–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.05.055CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dpto. de Prehistoria y ArqueologíaUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid, Campus CantoblancoMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations