Advertisement

Accreditation, Ranking and Classification in Vietnamese Higher Education: The Localization of Foreign-Born QA Models and Methods

  • Quyen Thi Ngoc Do
Chapter
Part of the Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (EDAP, volume 50)

Abstract

This chapter discusses major questions of importing foreign-born Quality Assurance models and policies into the local higher education contexts, specifically focusing on accreditation, ranking and classification (also referred to as stratification). The discussion provides insights into the evolvement of the local higher education quality assurance system and implications about how to develop a better established system in the future. Since educational model and policy borrowings have gained increased popularity, the analysis through the lens of model borrowing should be useful for local higher education policymakers in the national educational reform.

References

  1. Australia’s Office of Parliamentary Counsel. (2014). Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (amended June 2014) [TEQSA Act 2011]. Canberra.Google Scholar
  2. Council for Higher Education Accreditation [CHEA]. (2016). 2015–2016 Directory of CHEA-recognized organizations.Google Scholar
  3. Department of Education-Employment and Workplace Relation [DEEWR]. (2011). Tertiary education quality and standards agency (consequential amendments and transitional provisions) bill 2011 – A guide to the exposure draft. Australia.Google Scholar
  4. Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–357.Google Scholar
  5. Eaton, J. S. (2012). An overview of US accreditation. http://www.chea.org/pdf/OverviewofUSAccreditation2012.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept.
  6. Grove, J., & Havergal, C. (2015). Is ‘risk-based’ quality assurance too risky? Times Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/is-risk-based-quality-assurance-too-risky
  7. Ministry of Education and Training [MOET]. (2012). Thông tư 62/2012/TT-BGDĐT ban hành Quy định về quy trình và chu kỳ kiểm định chất lượng giáo dục đại học, cao đẳng và trung cấp chuyên nghiệp [Circular promulgating accreditation procedure and cycle for universities, colleges and professional high schools]. Hanoi: MOET.Google Scholar
  8. Ministry of Education and Training [MoET]. (2013). Thông tư 38/2013/TT-BGDĐT Ban hành Quy định về quy trình và chu kỳ kiểm định chất lượng chương trình đào tạo của các trường đại học, cao đẳng và trung cấp chuyên nghiệp [Circular promulgating programmatic accreditation procedure and cycle for universities, colleges and professional high schools]. Hanoi: MoET.Google Scholar
  9. Ministry of Education and Training [MoET]. (2015). Thông tư 24/2015/TT-BGDĐT quy định chuẩn quốc gia đối với cơ sở giáo dục đại học [Circular specifying national standards of higher education institutions]. Hanoi: MoET.Google Scholar
  10. Nguyen, D. K., Oliver, D. E., & Priddy, L. E. (2009). Criteria for accreditation in Vietnam’s higher education: Focus on input or outcome? Quality in Higher Education, 15(2), 123–134.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320902995766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ochs, K., & Phillips, D. (2002). Towards a structural typology of cross-national attraction in education. Lisbon: Educa.Google Scholar
  12. Park, C., Wilding, M., & Chung, C. (2014). The importance of feedback: Policy transfer, translation and the role of communication. Policy Studies, 35(4), 397–412.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2013.875155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Phillips, D. S. (2015). 2015 accreditation policy recommendations. Washington, DC: National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity (NACIQI).Google Scholar
  14. Quyen-Do, T. N. (2010). Vietnamese higher education: Rankings or classification? In National workshop on evaluation and ranking of Vietnamese colleges and universities, Ho Chi Minh City, 2010 (pp. 156–163). Hanoi: Vietnam Universities Network.Google Scholar
  15. Quyen-Do, T. N. (2016). Benchmarking for continuous improvement: A study in the domain of university governance. Doctoral dissertation. The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.Google Scholar
  16. Quyen-Do, T. N., Huong-Pham, T., & Kim-Nguyen, D. (2017). Quality assurance in the Vietnamese higher education: A top-down approach and compliance-driven QA. In M. Shah & T. N. Quyen-Do (Eds.), The rise of quality assurance in Asian higher education. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2004). Globalisation in education: Real or imagined? In G. Steiner-Khamsi & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.), The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. New York: Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Studley, J. S. (2012). 2012 Accreditation policy recommendations (U.S. Department of Education, Ed.). Washington, DC: National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity (NACIQI).Google Scholar
  19. Thao-Vu, T. P., & Marginson, S. (2014). Policy borrowing. In L. Tran, S. Marginson, H. Do, Q. Do, T. Le, N. Nguyen, et al. (Eds.), Higher education in Vietnam: Flexibility, mobility and practicality in the global knowledge economy (Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Thủ tướng Chính phủ [Prime Minister]. (2015). Nghị định 73/2015/NĐ-CP Quy định tiêu chuẩn phân tầng, khung sếp hạng và tiêu chuẩn xếp hạng cơ sở giáo dục đại học [Decree specifying stratification standards, ranking framework and ranking indicators for higher education institutions]. Hanoi.Google Scholar
  21. University Learning Teaching and Student Experience Committee (Higher Education Funding Council for England). (2012). A risk-based approach to quality asurance (2012/27). Retrieved from http://www.ncl.ac.uk/ltds//assets/documents/com-rep-ultsec-12nov-docE.pdf
  22. van Vught, F. A., Kaiser, F., File, J. M., Gaethgens, C., Peter, R., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2010). U-Map – The European classification of higher education institutions. Enschede: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies [CHEPS].Google Scholar
  23. Vlăsceanu, L., Grunberg, L., & Pârlea, D. (2007). Quality assurance and accreditation: A glossary of basic terms and definitions (2nd ed.). Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES.Google Scholar
  24. Waldow, F. (2012). Standardization and legitimacy – Two central concepts in research on educational borrowing and lending. In T. Seddon, J. Ozga, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), Policy borrowing and lending in education (World yearbook of education). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Quyen Thi Ngoc Do
    • 1
  1. 1.Hanoi University of Business and TechnologyHanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations