Advertisement

Subjectively and Objectively Measured Hazard Perception Ability of Young Chinese Drivers

  • Lingsen Hua
  • Long SunEmail author
  • Yidan Ma
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 576)

Abstract

The present study examined the characteristics of subjectively and objectively measured hazard perception ability of violation-free and violation-involved drivers and the consistency between self-assessments and their response time. Forty-seven young Chinese novice drivers finished a video-based hazard perception task and a self-reported hazard perception questionnaire. Results showed that violation-free drivers responded to the hazards faster than violation-involved drivers. Violation-free drivers also had lower self-assessment score than violation-involved drivers. Importantly, drivers’ self-assessment score correlated positively with the number of traffic violations from the last year. No significant correlations were found between drivers’ response time to the hazards with their self-assessments or the number of traffic violations. The findings suggested that young drivers’ self-assessments did not correspond to their response time, which might partially contribute to their violation involvement.

Keywords

Hazard perception Young drivers Self-assessment Response time Traffic violations 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The study was approved by the Logistics Department for Civilian Ethics Committee of Liaoning Normal University.

All subjects who participated in the experiment were provided with and signed an informed consent form.

All relevant ethical safeguards have been met with regard to subject protection.

References

  1. 1.
    Wetton MA, Horswill MS, Hatherly C et al (2010) The development and validation of two complementary measures of drivers’ hazard perception ability. Accid Anal Prev 42(4):1232–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Horswill MS, Hill A, Wetton M (2015) Can a video-based hazard perception test used for driver licensing predict crash involvement? Accid Anal Prev 82:213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pelz DC, Krupat E (1974) Caution profile and driving record of undergraduate males. Accid Anal Prev 6(1):45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ābele L, Haustein S, Møller M et al (2018) Consistency between subjectively and objectively measured hazard perception skills among young male drivers. Accid Anal Prev 118:214–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Horswill MS, Waylen AE, Tofield MI (2004) Drivers’ ratings of different components of their own driving skill: a greater illusion of superiority for skills that relate to accident involvement. J Appl Soc Psychol 34(1):177–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martinussen LM, Møller M, Prato CG (2017) Accuracy of young male drivers’ self-assessments of driving skill. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 46:228–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sümer N, Ünal AB, Birdal A et al (2007) Comparison of self-reported and computer-based hazard perception skills among novice and experienced drivers. In: Proceedings of the fourth international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle designGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheng AS, Ng TC, Lee HC (2011) A comparison of the hazard perception ability of accident-involved and accident-free motorcycle riders. Accid Anal Prev 43(4):1464–1471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    White MJ, Cunningham LC, Titchener K (2011) Young drivers’ optimism bias for accident risk and driving skill: accountability and insight experience manipulations. Accid Anal Prev 43(4):1309–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun L, Li S, Chang R (2019) Development and validity of Chinese hazard perception test. Lect Notes Electr Eng 527:257–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sun L, Dou G (2019) Computer-based hazard perception study in Chinese environmental effects of driving experience and age. Ekoloji 28(107):4311–4317Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sun L, Chang R, Li S (2018) Effects of driving experience and hazard type on young drivers’ hazard perception. Lect Notes Electr Eng 456:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deery HA (1999) Hazard and risk perception among young novice drivers. J Saf Res 30(4):225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ventsislavova P, Gugliotta A, Peña-Suarez E et al (2016) What happens when drivers face hazards on the road? Accid Anal Prev 91:43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ma Y, Sun L (2018) Reliability and validity of self-assessment of driving skills scale in Chinese drivers. Adv Psychol 8(6):848–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyLiaoning Normal UniversityDalianChina

Personalised recommendations